TSTP Solution File: SEU247+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SEU247+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QXa4ebE8CV true
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 19:11:35 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 6 unt; 6 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 11 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 94 ( 10 ~; 4 |; 0 &; 76 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 7 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 8 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 ^; 14 !; 0 ?; 14 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__1_type,type,
sk__1: $i ).
thf(relation_restriction_type,type,
relation_restriction: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i ).
thf(relation_dom_restriction_type,type,
relation_dom_restriction: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(relation_rng_restriction_type,type,
relation_rng_restriction: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(relation_type,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
thf(t17_wellord1,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( relation @ B )
=> ( ( relation_restriction @ B @ A )
= ( relation_dom_restriction @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ B ) @ A ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ( relation_restriction @ X1 @ X0 )
= ( relation_dom_restriction @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X0 ) )
| ~ ( relation @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t17_wellord1]) ).
thf(t140_relat_1,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( relation @ C )
=> ( ( relation_dom_restriction @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ C ) @ B )
= ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl8,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( ( relation_dom_restriction @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 )
= ( relation_rng_restriction @ X0 @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ X1 @ X2 ) ) )
| ~ ( relation @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t140_relat_1]) ).
thf(t18_wellord1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( relation @ B )
=> ( ( relation_restriction @ B @ A )
= ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ B @ A ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( relation @ B )
=> ( ( relation_restriction @ B @ A )
= ( relation_rng_restriction @ A @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[t18_wellord1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl11,plain,
( ( relation_restriction @ sk__1 @ sk_ )
!= ( relation_rng_restriction @ sk_ @ ( relation_dom_restriction @ sk__1 @ sk_ ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl37,plain,
( ( ( relation_restriction @ sk__1 @ sk_ )
!= ( relation_dom_restriction @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ sk_ @ sk__1 ) @ sk_ ) )
| ~ ( relation @ sk__1 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl8,zip_derived_cl11]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl10,plain,
relation @ sk__1,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl39,plain,
( ( relation_restriction @ sk__1 @ sk_ )
!= ( relation_dom_restriction @ ( relation_rng_restriction @ sk_ @ sk__1 ) @ sk_ ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl37,zip_derived_cl10]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl40,plain,
( ( ( relation_restriction @ sk__1 @ sk_ )
!= ( relation_restriction @ sk__1 @ sk_ ) )
| ~ ( relation @ sk__1 ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl9,zip_derived_cl39]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl10_001,plain,
relation @ sk__1,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl41,plain,
( ( relation_restriction @ sk__1 @ sk_ )
!= ( relation_restriction @ sk__1 @ sk_ ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl40,zip_derived_cl10]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl42,plain,
$false,
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl41]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SEU247+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.QXa4ebE8CV true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 18:13:22 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.62 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.62 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.62 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.74 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.21/0.74 % BCE start: 12
% 0.21/0.74 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.21/0.74 % PE start: 12
% 0.21/0.74 logic: eq
% 0.21/0.74 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.21/0.74 % done 11 iterations in 0.007s
% 0.21/0.74 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.21/0.74 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.74
% 0.21/0.74
% 0.21/0.74 % Terminating...
% 1.26/0.84 % Runner terminated.
% 1.26/0.85 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------