TSTP Solution File: SEU247+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SEU247+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:28:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.58s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SEU247+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 18:16:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Sun Jun 19 18:16:52 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 8437.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=2.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35 Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.12/0.35 sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] {-} set_intersection2(A,B)=set_intersection2(B,A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [copy,16,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 7
% 0.12/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 12
% 0.12/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 58
% 0.12/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 91
% 0.12/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.12/0.39 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.12/0.39 distinct function count: 5
% 0.12/0.39 distinct constant count: 2
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.21 sec ----> 28 [binary,27.1,16.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 Length of proof is 6. Level of proof is 3.
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 6 [] {-} -relation(A)|relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(B,A),C)=relation_rng_restriction(B,relation_dom_restriction(A,C)).
% 0.19/0.58 7 [copy,6,flip.2] {+} -relation(A)|relation_rng_restriction(B,relation_dom_restriction(A,C))=relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(B,A),C).
% 0.19/0.58 8 [] {-} -relation(A)|relation_restriction(A,B)=relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(B,A),B).
% 0.19/0.58 9 [copy,8,flip.2] {+} -relation(A)|relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(B,A),B)=relation_restriction(A,B).
% 0.19/0.58 10 [] {-} relation_restriction($c1,$c2)!=relation_rng_restriction($c2,relation_dom_restriction($c1,$c2)).
% 0.19/0.58 11 [copy,10,flip.1] {+} relation_rng_restriction($c2,relation_dom_restriction($c1,$c2))!=relation_restriction($c1,$c2).
% 0.19/0.58 15 [] {-} relation($c1).
% 0.19/0.58 16 [] {+} A=A.
% 0.19/0.58 19,18 [hyper,15,9] {-} relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(A,$c1),A)=relation_restriction($c1,A).
% 0.19/0.58 21,20 [hyper,15,7] {-} relation_rng_restriction(A,relation_dom_restriction($c1,B))=relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(A,$c1),B).
% 0.19/0.58 27 [back_demod,11,demod,21,19] {-} relation_restriction($c1,$c2)!=relation_restriction($c1,$c2).
% 0.19/0.58 28 [binary,27.1,16.1] {-} $F.
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.19/0.58 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 ============ end of search ============
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 0.19/0.58 false clauses given 2
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 FALSE TRUE
% 0.19/0.58 3 0 1
% 0.19/0.58 5 1 0
% 0.19/0.58 11 0 1
% 0.19/0.58 tot: 1 2 (66.7% true)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.19/0.58
% 0.19/0.58 Process 8437 finished Sun Jun 19 18:16:53 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------