TSTP Solution File: SEU247+1 by Faust---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Faust---1.0
% Problem : SEU247+1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : faust %s
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 1003MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed May 6 15:53:38 EDT 2009
% Result : Theorem 7.8s
% Output : Refutation 7.8s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 6 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn 5 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Faust---1.0 format not known, defaulting to TPTP
fof(t18_wellord1,plain,
( relation(b)
& ~ $equal(relation_rng_restriction(a,relation_dom_restriction(b,a)),relation_restriction(b,a)) ),
file('/tmp/SystemOnTPTP6893/SEU247+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(149251288,plain,
relation(b),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[t18_wellord1]),
[] ).
fof(t140_relat_1,plain,
! [C,A,B] :
( ~ relation(C)
| $equal(relation_rng_restriction(A,relation_dom_restriction(C,B)),relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(A,C),B)) ),
file('/tmp/SystemOnTPTP6893/SEU247+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(149172880,plain,
( ~ relation(C)
| $equal(relation_rng_restriction(A,relation_dom_restriction(C,B)),relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(A,C),B)) ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[t140_relat_1]),
[] ).
fof(t17_wellord1,plain,
! [B,A] :
( ~ relation(B)
| $equal(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(A,B),A),relation_restriction(B,A)) ),
file('/tmp/SystemOnTPTP6893/SEU247+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(149176872,plain,
( ~ relation(B)
| $equal(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(A,B),A),relation_restriction(B,A)) ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[t17_wellord1]),
[] ).
cnf(159743504,plain,
$equal(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(A,b),A),relation_restriction(b,A)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[149176872,149251288]),
[] ).
cnf(185060440,plain,
$equal(relation_rng_restriction(A,relation_dom_restriction(b,A)),relation_restriction(b,A)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution__paramodulation,[status(thm)],[149251288,149172880,159743504,theory(equality)]),
[] ).
cnf(149242248,plain,
~ $equal(relation_rng_restriction(a,relation_dom_restriction(b,a)),relation_restriction(b,a)),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[t18_wellord1]),
[] ).
cnf(contradiction,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[185060440,149242248]),
[] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Proof found in: 7 seconds
% START OF PROOF SEQUENCE
% fof(t18_wellord1,plain,((relation(b)&~$equal(relation_rng_restriction(a,relation_dom_restriction(b,a)),relation_restriction(b,a)))),file('/tmp/SystemOnTPTP6893/SEU247+1.p',unknown),[]).
%
% cnf(149251288,plain,(relation(b)),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[t18_wellord1]),[]).
%
% fof(t140_relat_1,plain,(~relation(C)|$equal(relation_rng_restriction(A,relation_dom_restriction(C,B)),relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(A,C),B))),file('/tmp/SystemOnTPTP6893/SEU247+1.p',unknown),[]).
%
% cnf(149172880,plain,(~relation(C)|$equal(relation_rng_restriction(A,relation_dom_restriction(C,B)),relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(A,C),B))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[t140_relat_1]),[]).
%
% fof(t17_wellord1,plain,(~relation(B)|$equal(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(A,B),A),relation_restriction(B,A))),file('/tmp/SystemOnTPTP6893/SEU247+1.p',unknown),[]).
%
% cnf(149176872,plain,(~relation(B)|$equal(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(A,B),A),relation_restriction(B,A))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[t17_wellord1]),[]).
%
% cnf(159743504,plain,($equal(relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(A,b),A),relation_restriction(b,A))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[149176872,149251288]),[]).
%
% cnf(185060440,plain,($equal(relation_rng_restriction(A,relation_dom_restriction(b,A)),relation_restriction(b,A))),inference(forward_subsumption_resolution__paramodulation,[status(thm)],[149251288,149172880,159743504,theory(equality)]),[]).
%
% cnf(149242248,plain,(~$equal(relation_rng_restriction(a,relation_dom_restriction(b,a)),relation_restriction(b,a))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[t18_wellord1]),[]).
%
% cnf(contradiction,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[185060440,149242248]),[]).
%
% END OF PROOF SEQUENCE
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------