TSTP Solution File: SEU247+1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SEU247+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:23:46 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 4 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 11 ( 6 >; 5 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 0 sgn; 14 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
set_intersection2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
relation_restriction: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
cartesian_product2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
relation_dom_restriction: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
relation_rng_restriction: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
fof(t18_wellord1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t18_wellord1) ).
fof(t140_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X3),X2) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_dom_restriction(X3,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t140_relat_1) ).
fof(t17_wellord1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t17_wellord1) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation_restriction(X2,X1) = relation_rng_restriction(X1,relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t18_wellord1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk2_0)
& relation_restriction(esk2_0,esk1_0) != relation_rng_restriction(esk1_0,relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,esk1_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X15,X16,X17] :
( ~ relation(X17)
| relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X15,X17),X16) = relation_rng_restriction(X15,relation_dom_restriction(X17,X16)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t140_relat_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
relation_restriction(esk2_0,esk1_0) != relation_rng_restriction(esk1_0,relation_dom_restriction(esk2_0,esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1),X3) = relation_rng_restriction(X2,relation_dom_restriction(X1,X3))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X18,X19] :
( ~ relation(X19)
| relation_restriction(X19,X18) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X18,X19),X18) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t17_wellord1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk1_0) != relation_restriction(esk2_0,esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( relation_restriction(X1,X2) = relation_dom_restriction(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1),X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SEU247+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.18/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 18:12:50 EDT 2023
% 0.19/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.56 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.58 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.58 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.58 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.58 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.58 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.58 % Total time : 0.005000 s
% 0.20/0.58 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.58 % Total time : 0.008000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------