TSTP Solution File: SEU242+2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SEU242+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:28:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 0.51s 0.71s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU242+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 09:35:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.40  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.40  The process was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.40  Mon Jun 20 09:35:59 2022
% 0.20/0.40  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 30150.
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.40  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.40  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.40  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.40  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.40  clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.40     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_transitive(A).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ordinal(A)| -epsilon_transitive(A)| -epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 227 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -relation_empty_yielding(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 223 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -relation(B)| -function(B)|relation(relation_composition(A,B)).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 222 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|relation(relation_inverse(A)).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 236 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)| -empty(succ(A)).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 227 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 296 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(A,C).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 297 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(B,D).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 298 during input processing: 0 [] {-} in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))| -in(A,C)| -in(B,D).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 102 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -element(A,B)|empty(B)|in(A,B).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 279 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)!=empty_set|subset(A,B).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 280 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)=empty_set| -subset(A,B).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 277 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(singleton(A),B)|in(A,B).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 278 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(singleton(A),B)| -in(A,B).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 293 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(A,singleton(B))|A=empty_set|A=singleton(B).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 294 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=empty_set.
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.20/0.40    Following clause subsumed by 271 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|set_union2(singleton(A),B)=B.
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 355 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)|in(B,relation_dom(A)).
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 135 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)| -in(B,relation_dom(A))|C!=apply(A,B).
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 295 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|subset(A,union(B)).
% 0.20/0.47  129 back subsumes 126.
% 0.20/0.47  353 back subsumes 103.
% 0.20/0.47  468 back subsumes 301.
% 0.20/0.47  469 back subsumes 300.
% 0.20/0.47  470 back subsumes 302.
% 0.20/0.47  473 back subsumes 136.
% 0.20/0.47  489 back subsumes 488.
% 0.20/0.47  497 back subsumes 496.
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 670 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 668 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(identity_relation(A)).
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 671 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 672 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 670 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 670 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 671 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 636 during input processing: 0 [copy,636,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 637 during input processing: 0 [copy,637,flip.1] {-} set_union2(A,B)=set_union2(B,A).
% 0.20/0.47  719 back subsumes 593.
% 0.20/0.47  719 back subsumes 592.
% 0.20/0.47  719 back subsumes 578.
% 0.20/0.47  719 back subsumes 522.
% 0.20/0.47  719 back subsumes 521.
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 766 during input processing: 0 [copy,766,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 622.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 617.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 594.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 591.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 575.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 574.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 537.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 533.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 527.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 520.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 510.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 509.
% 0.20/0.47  766 back subsumes 486.
% 0.20/0.47    Following clause subsumed by 767 during input processing: 0 [copy,767,flip.1] {-} set_difference(A,set_difference(A,B))=set_difference(B,set_difference(B,A)).
% 0.20/0.47  792 back subsumes 98.
% 0.20/0.47  794 back subsumes 99.
% 0.20/0.47  
% 0.20/0.47  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.51/0.70  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.51/0.70  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.51/0.70  number of clauses in intial UL: 520
% 0.51/0.70  number of clauses initially in problem: 700
% 0.51/0.70  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 74
% 0.51/0.70  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 49
% 0.51/0.70  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.51/0.70  absolute distinct symbol count: 301
% 0.51/0.70     distinct predicate count: 25
% 0.51/0.70     distinct function count: 219
% 0.51/0.70     distinct constant count: 57
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 0.51/0.70  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.51/0.70  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.51/0.70  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 0.51/0.70  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.51/0.70  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.51/0.70  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  
% 0.51/0.70  The job finished Mon Jun 20 09:36:00 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------