TSTP Solution File: SEU241+2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SEU241+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:28:05 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 0.47s 0.68s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem  : SEU241+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.02/0.10  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 11:39:40 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.36  Sun Jun 19 11:39:40 2022
% 0.15/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 15654.
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.15/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.15/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.15/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.15/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.15/0.36  
% 0.15/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_transitive(A).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 5 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)|epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} ordinal(A)| -epsilon_transitive(A)| -epsilon_connected(A).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 219 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -relation_empty_yielding(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 215 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -relation(B)| -function(B)|relation(relation_composition(A,B)).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 214 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -one_to_one(A)|relation(relation_inverse(A)).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 228 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -ordinal(A)| -empty(succ(A)).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 219 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_dom_restriction(A,B)).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 282 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(A,C).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 283 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))|in(B,D).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 284 during input processing: 0 [] {-} in(ordered_pair(A,B),cartesian_product2(C,D))| -in(A,C)| -in(B,D).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 100 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -element(A,B)|empty(B)|in(A,B).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 271 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)!=empty_set|subset(A,B).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 272 during input processing: 0 [] {-} set_difference(A,B)=empty_set| -subset(A,B).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 269 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(singleton(A),B)|in(A,B).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 270 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(singleton(A),B)| -in(A,B).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 279 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -subset(A,singleton(B))|A=empty_set|A=singleton(B).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 280 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=empty_set.
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [] {-} subset(A,singleton(B))|A!=singleton(B).
% 0.15/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 263 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|set_union2(singleton(A),B)=B.
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 341 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)| -in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)|in(B,relation_dom(A)).
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 133 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)| -in(B,relation_dom(A))|C!=apply(A,B).
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 281 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -in(A,B)|subset(A,union(B)).
% 0.15/0.42  127 back subsumes 124.
% 0.15/0.42  339 back subsumes 101.
% 0.15/0.42  454 back subsumes 287.
% 0.15/0.42  455 back subsumes 286.
% 0.15/0.42  456 back subsumes 288.
% 0.15/0.42  459 back subsumes 134.
% 0.15/0.42  475 back subsumes 474.
% 0.15/0.42  483 back subsumes 482.
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 654 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 652 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(identity_relation(A)).
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 655 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 656 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 654 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 654 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 655 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 620 during input processing: 0 [copy,620,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 621 during input processing: 0 [copy,621,flip.1] {-} set_union2(A,B)=set_union2(B,A).
% 0.15/0.42  703 back subsumes 577.
% 0.15/0.42  703 back subsumes 576.
% 0.15/0.42  703 back subsumes 562.
% 0.15/0.42  703 back subsumes 508.
% 0.15/0.42  703 back subsumes 507.
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 750 during input processing: 0 [copy,750,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.15/0.42  750 back subsumes 606.
% 0.15/0.42  750 back subsumes 601.
% 0.15/0.42  750 back subsumes 578.
% 0.15/0.42  750 back subsumes 575.
% 0.15/0.42  750 back subsumes 559.
% 0.15/0.42  750 back subsumes 522.
% 0.15/0.42  750 back subsumes 513.
% 0.15/0.42  750 back subsumes 506.
% 0.15/0.42  750 back subsumes 496.
% 0.15/0.42  750 back subsumes 495.
% 0.15/0.42  750 back subsumes 472.
% 0.15/0.42    Following clause subsumed by 751 during input processing: 0 [copy,751,flip.1] {-} set_difference(A,set_difference(A,B))=set_difference(B,set_difference(B,A)).
% 0.15/0.42  776 back subsumes 96.
% 0.15/0.42  778 back subsumes 97.
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.47/0.68  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.47/0.68  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.47/0.68  number of clauses in intial UL: 506
% 0.47/0.68  number of clauses initially in problem: 686
% 0.47/0.68  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 73
% 0.47/0.68  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 50
% 0.47/0.68  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.47/0.68  absolute distinct symbol count: 279
% 0.47/0.68     distinct predicate count: 23
% 0.47/0.68     distinct function count: 207
% 0.47/0.68     distinct constant count: 49
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 0.47/0.68  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.47/0.68  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.47/0.68  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  SEGMENTATION FAULT!!  This is probably caused by a
% 0.47/0.68  bug in Otter.  Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.47/0.68  otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.47/0.68  using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  
% 0.47/0.68  The job finished Sun Jun 19 11:39:40 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------