TSTP Solution File: SEU239+1 by Leo-III---1.7.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem : SEU239+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:57:46 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.38s 1.90s
% Output : Refutation 3.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 43
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 72 ( 21 unt; 16 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 127 ( 16 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 320 ( 22 ~; 2 |; 27 &; 227 @)
% ( 4 <=>; 38 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 21 ( 21 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 18 ( 16 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 87 ( 0 ^; 75 !; 12 ?; 87 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(relation_type,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
thf(reflexive_type,type,
reflexive: $i > $o ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(relation_field_type,type,
relation_field: $i > $i ).
thf(ordered_pair_type,type,
ordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(empty_type,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(set_union2_type,type,
set_union2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(empty_set_type,type,
empty_set: $i ).
thf(unordered_pair_type,type,
unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(function_type,type,
function: $i > $o ).
thf(element_type,type,
element: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(one_to_one_type,type,
one_to_one: $i > $o ).
thf(relation_dom_type,type,
relation_dom: $i > $i ).
thf(relation_rng_type,type,
relation_rng: $i > $i ).
thf(singleton_type,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
thf(is_reflexive_in_type,type,
is_reflexive_in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( empty @ A )
=> ~ ( empty @ ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc3_xboole_0) ).
thf(42,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( empty @ A )
=> ~ ( empty @ ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( unordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).
thf(52,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( unordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
=> ( ( reflexive @ A )
<=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( in @ B @ ( relation_field @ A ) )
=> ( in @ ( ordered_pair @ B @ B ) @ A ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l1_wellord1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
=> ( ( reflexive @ A )
<=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( in @ B @ ( relation_field @ A ) )
=> ( in @ ( ordered_pair @ B @ B ) @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(29,plain,
~ ! [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
=> ( ( ( reflexive @ A )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( in @ B @ ( relation_field @ A ) )
=> ( in @ ( ordered_pair @ B @ B ) @ A ) ) )
& ( ! [B: $i] :
( ( in @ B @ ( relation_field @ A ) )
=> ( in @ ( ordered_pair @ B @ B ) @ A ) )
=> ( reflexive @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( function @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_funct_1) ).
thf(61,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( function @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(18,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_funct_1) ).
thf(77,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(45,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( element @ B @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_subset_1) ).
thf(66,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( element @ B @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(19,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
=> ( ( relation_field @ A )
= ( set_union2 @ ( relation_dom @ A ) @ ( relation_rng @ A ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d6_relat_1) ).
thf(80,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
=> ( ( relation_field @ A )
= ( set_union2 @ ( relation_dom @ A ) @ ( relation_rng @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( empty @ A )
& ( A != B )
& ( empty @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_boole) ).
thf(36,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( empty @ A )
& ( A != B )
& ( empty @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(27,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
& ( empty @ A )
& ( function @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_funct_1) ).
thf(107,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
& ( empty @ A )
& ( function @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( set_union2 @ A @ B )
= ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).
thf(68,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( set_union2 @ A @ B )
= ( set_union2 @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(23,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ ( singleton @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).
thf(92,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ ( singleton @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
thf(25,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( is_reflexive_in @ A @ B )
<=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ B )
=> ( in @ ( ordered_pair @ C @ C ) @ A ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_relat_2) ).
thf(97,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( ( is_reflexive_in @ A @ B )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ B )
=> ( in @ ( ordered_pair @ C @ C ) @ A ) ) )
& ( ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ B )
=> ( in @ ( ordered_pair @ C @ C ) @ A ) )
=> ( is_reflexive_in @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
thf(16,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A )
& ( one_to_one @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc3_funct_1) ).
thf(71,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A )
& ( one_to_one @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).
thf(49,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
empty @ empty_set,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(48,plain,
empty @ empty_set,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( empty @ A )
=> ~ ( empty @ ( set_union2 @ A @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(63,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( empty @ A )
=> ~ ( empty @ ( set_union2 @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(24,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(95,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
thf(21,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( in @ A @ B )
& ( empty @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).
thf(87,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( in @ A @ B )
& ( empty @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
thf(26,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
=> ( ( reflexive @ A )
<=> ( is_reflexive_in @ A @ ( relation_field @ A ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d9_relat_2) ).
thf(104,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
=> ( ( ( reflexive @ A )
=> ( is_reflexive_in @ A @ ( relation_field @ A ) ) )
& ( ( is_reflexive_in @ A @ ( relation_field @ A ) )
=> ( reflexive @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(40,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( set_union2 @ A @ empty_set )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_boole) ).
thf(55,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( set_union2 @ A @ empty_set )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(17,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( element @ A @ B )
=> ( ( empty @ B )
| ( in @ A @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_subset) ).
thf(75,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( element @ A @ B )
=> ( ( empty @ B )
| ( in @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( set_union2 @ A @ A )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).
thf(58,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( set_union2 @ A @ A )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(20,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ A )
& ( empty @ A )
& ( function @ A ) )
=> ( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A )
& ( one_to_one @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc2_funct_1) ).
thf(83,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ A )
& ( empty @ A )
& ( function @ A ) )
=> ( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A )
& ( one_to_one @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
thf(22,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ( element @ A @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_subset) ).
thf(90,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ( element @ A @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
thf(28,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( empty @ ( ordered_pair @ A @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(111,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( empty @ ( ordered_pair @ A @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
thf(114,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[42,52,29,61,77,45,66,80,36,107,68,92,97,71,49,48,63,95,87,104,40,55,75,58,83,90,111]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SEU239+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.15 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu May 18 13:44:26 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.88/0.85 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.01/0.97 % [INFO] Parsing done (121ms).
% 1.34/0.98 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.62/1.18 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.62/1.18 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.62/1.19 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.79/1.24 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 35 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.01/1.30 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 26 axioms (removed 9 axioms).
% 2.01/1.35 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.01/1.36 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.01/1.37 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.38/1.90 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.38/1.90 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.38/1.90 % Time passed: 1379ms (effective reasoning time: 914ms)
% 3.38/1.90 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.38/1.90 % Axioms used in derivation (26): fc1_zfmisc_1, t1_boole, rc3_funct_1, t6_boole, fc3_xboole_0, rc2_funct_1, t2_subset, idempotence_k2_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, fc1_xboole_0, d5_tarski, t1_subset, rc1_funct_1, fc2_xboole_0, d9_relat_2, commutativity_k2_xboole_0, t7_boole, cc1_funct_1, cc2_funct_1, existence_m1_subset_1, commutativity_k2_tarski, d1_relat_2, d6_relat_1, t8_boole, rc1_xboole_0
% 3.38/1.90 % No. of inferences in proof: 56
% 3.38/1.90 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1379 ms resp. 914 ms w/o parsing
% 3.79/1.94 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.79/1.94 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------