TSTP Solution File: SEU239+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SEU239+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:31:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 76 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 87 ( 34 ~; 36 |; 6 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 0 sgn; 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l1_wellord1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ( reflexive(X1)
<=> ! [X2] :
( in(X2,relation_field(X1))
=> in(ordered_pair(X2,X2),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.VgVHMAVMr5/E---3.1_27611.p',l1_wellord1) ).
fof(d1_relat_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( is_reflexive_in(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
=> in(ordered_pair(X3,X3),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.VgVHMAVMr5/E---3.1_27611.p',d1_relat_2) ).
fof(d9_relat_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ( reflexive(X1)
<=> is_reflexive_in(X1,relation_field(X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.VgVHMAVMr5/E---3.1_27611.p',d9_relat_2) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ( reflexive(X1)
<=> ! [X2] :
( in(X2,relation_field(X1))
=> in(ordered_pair(X2,X2),X1) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l1_wellord1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X18,X19,X20,X21] :
( ( ~ is_reflexive_in(X18,X19)
| ~ in(X20,X19)
| in(ordered_pair(X20,X20),X18)
| ~ relation(X18) )
& ( in(esk5_2(X18,X21),X21)
| is_reflexive_in(X18,X21)
| ~ relation(X18) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X18,X21),esk5_2(X18,X21)),X18)
| is_reflexive_in(X18,X21)
| ~ relation(X18) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_relat_2])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X6] :
( relation(esk1_0)
& ( in(esk2_0,relation_field(esk1_0))
| ~ reflexive(esk1_0) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk2_0,esk2_0),esk1_0)
| ~ reflexive(esk1_0) )
& ( reflexive(esk1_0)
| ~ in(X6,relation_field(esk1_0))
| in(ordered_pair(X6,X6),esk1_0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( is_reflexive_in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X1,X2),esk5_2(X1,X2)),X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( reflexive(esk1_0)
| in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),esk1_0)
| ~ in(X1,relation_field(esk1_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X13] :
( ( ~ reflexive(X13)
| is_reflexive_in(X13,relation_field(X13))
| ~ relation(X13) )
& ( ~ is_reflexive_in(X13,relation_field(X13))
| reflexive(X13)
| ~ relation(X13) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d9_relat_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( reflexive(esk1_0)
| is_reflexive_in(esk1_0,X1)
| ~ in(esk5_2(esk1_0,X1),relation_field(esk1_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( in(esk5_2(X1,X2),X2)
| is_reflexive_in(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( reflexive(X1)
| ~ is_reflexive_in(X1,relation_field(X1))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( reflexive(esk1_0)
| is_reflexive_in(esk1_0,relation_field(esk1_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk2_0,esk2_0),esk1_0)
| ~ reflexive(esk1_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
reflexive(esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X3),X1)
| ~ is_reflexive_in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X3,X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( is_reflexive_in(X1,relation_field(X1))
| ~ reflexive(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk2_0,relation_field(esk1_0))
| ~ reflexive(esk1_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ in(ordered_pair(esk2_0,esk2_0),esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),X2)
| ~ reflexive(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_field(X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
in(esk2_0,relation_field(esk1_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_15]),c_0_8]),c_0_21])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU239+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 09:06:14 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.VgVHMAVMr5/E---3.1_27611.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 27689 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 27692 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGHSF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 36
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 27
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses : 15
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 15
% 0.20/0.49 # Processed clauses : 48
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.20/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 45
% 0.20/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.20/0.49 # Generated clauses : 23
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 22
% 0.20/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Paramodulations : 23
% 0.20/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 15
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 21
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 24
% 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22
% 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1396
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------