TSTP Solution File: SEU230+3 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU230+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:18:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 59 ( 24 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 68 ( 27 ~; 29 |; 8 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 1 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 9 sgn 25 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t10_ordinal1,conjecture,
! [X1] : in(X1,succ(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t10_ordinal1) ).
fof(d1_ordinal1,axiom,
! [X1] : succ(X1) = set_union2(X1,singleton(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d1_ordinal1) ).
fof(d2_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( X3 = set_union2(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4] :
( in(X4,X3)
<=> ( in(X4,X1)
| in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d2_xboole_0) ).
fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( X2 = singleton(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> X3 = X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d1_tarski) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] : in(X1,succ(X1)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t10_ordinal1]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk14_0,succ(esk14_0)),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X2] : succ(X2) = set_union2(X2,singleton(X2)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d1_ordinal1]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X8,X5,X6,X7] :
( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
| in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X6)
| X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X6)
| in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| ~ in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| ~ in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) )
& ( in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| X7 = set_union2(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk14_0,succ(esk14_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
succ(X1) = set_union2(X1,singleton(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( in(X4,X1)
| X1 != set_union2(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X6,X4,X5] :
( ( ~ in(X6,X5)
| X6 = X4
| X5 != singleton(X4) )
& ( X6 != X4
| in(X6,X5)
| X5 != singleton(X4) )
& ( ~ in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)
| esk1_2(X4,X5) != X4
| X5 = singleton(X4) )
& ( in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)
| esk1_2(X4,X5) = X4
| X5 = singleton(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk14_0,set_union2(esk14_0,singleton(esk14_0))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( in(X3,X1)
| X1 != singleton(X2)
| X3 != X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk14_0,singleton(esk14_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != singleton(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU230+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 07:36:07 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 34
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 59
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 56
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 80
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 70
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 10
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 142
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 97
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 122
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 14
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 60
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 25
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 64
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 197
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 114
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 102
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3110
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2924 pages
% 0.23/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------