TSTP Solution File: SEU230+2 by Metis---2.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : SEU230+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 12:39:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 28.71s 28.91s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 28.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  28 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (  23   ~;  15   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   2 sgn  30   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A) ).

fof(d1_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [A] : succ(A) = set_union2(A,singleton(A)) ).

fof(l2_zfmisc_1,lemma,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(singleton(A),B)
    <=> in(A,B) ) ).

fof(t10_ordinal1,conjecture,
    ! [A] : in(A,succ(A)) ).

fof(t37_zfmisc_1,lemma,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(singleton(A),B)
    <=> in(A,B) ) ).

fof(t7_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [A,B] : subset(A,set_union2(A,B)) ).

fof(subgoal_0,plain,
    ! [A] : in(A,succ(A)),
    inference(strip,[],[t10_ordinal1]) ).

fof(negate_0_0,plain,
    ~ ! [A] : in(A,succ(A)),
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
    ? [A] : ~ in(A,succ(A)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
    ~ in(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_9,succ(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_9)),
    inference(skolemize,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
    ! [A,B] : subset(A,set_union2(A,B)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[t7_xboole_1]) ).

fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
    ! [A,B] : subset(A,set_union2(A,B)),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_2]) ).

fof(normalize_0_4,plain,
    ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_5,plain,
    ! [A,B] : set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_4]) ).

fof(normalize_0_6,plain,
    ! [A] : succ(A) = set_union2(A,singleton(A)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[d1_ordinal1]) ).

fof(normalize_0_7,plain,
    ! [A] : succ(A) = set_union2(A,singleton(A)),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_6]) ).

fof(normalize_0_8,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ in(A,B)
    <=> ~ subset(singleton(A),B) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[t37_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(normalize_0_9,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ in(A,B)
    <=> ~ subset(singleton(A),B) ),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_8]) ).

fof(normalize_0_10,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( ~ in(A,B)
        | subset(singleton(A),B) )
      & ( ~ subset(singleton(A),B)
        | in(A,B) ) ),
    inference(clausify,[],[normalize_0_9]) ).

fof(normalize_0_11,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ subset(singleton(A),B)
      | in(A,B) ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ~ in(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_9,succ(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_9)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    subset(A,set_union2(A,B)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    set_union2(A,B) = set_union2(B,A),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( set_union2(A,B) != set_union2(B,A)
    | ~ subset(A,set_union2(A,B))
    | subset(A,set_union2(B,A)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( subset(A,set_union2(A,B)) ),[1],$fot(set_union2(B,A))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ subset(A,set_union2(A,B))
    | subset(A,set_union2(B,A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(set_union2(A,B),set_union2(B,A)) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    subset(A,set_union2(B,A)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( subset(A,set_union2(A,B)) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    subset(singleton(X_54),set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54))),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_5:[bind(A,$fot(singleton(X_54))),bind(B,$fot(X_54))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    succ(A) = set_union2(A,singleton(A)),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_7]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    succ(X_54) = set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(A,$fot(X_54))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    X = X,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( X != X
    | X != Y
    | Y = X ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X,X) ),[0],$fot(Y)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( X != Y
    | Y = X ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X,X) )],[refute_0_9,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( succ(X_54) != set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54))
    | set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54)) = succ(X_54) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(X,$fot(succ(X_54))),bind(Y,$fot(set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54))))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54)) = succ(X_54),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(succ(X_54),set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54))) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_12]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    ( set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54)) != succ(X_54)
    | ~ subset(singleton(X_54),set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54)))
    | subset(singleton(X_54),succ(X_54)) ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( subset(singleton(X_54),set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54))) ),[1],$fot(succ(X_54))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ subset(singleton(X_54),set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54)))
    | subset(singleton(X_54),succ(X_54)) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54)),succ(X_54)) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_14]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    subset(singleton(X_54),succ(X_54)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( subset(singleton(X_54),set_union2(X_54,singleton(X_54))) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_15]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    subset(singleton(X_209),succ(X_209)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_16:[bind(X_54,$fot(X_209))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ subset(singleton(A),B)
    | in(A,B) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_11]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ subset(singleton(X_209),succ(X_209))
    | in(X_209,succ(X_209)) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_18:[bind(A,$fot(X_209)),bind(B,$fot(succ(X_209)))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    in(X_209,succ(X_209)),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( subset(singleton(X_209),succ(X_209)) )],[refute_0_17,refute_0_19]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    in(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_9,succ(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_9)),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_20:[bind(X_209,$fot(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_9))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( in(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_9,succ(skolemFOFtoCNF_A_9)) )],[refute_0_21,refute_0_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SEU230+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 11:58:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 28.71/28.91  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 28.71/28.91  
% 28.71/28.91  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 28.71/28.91  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------