TSTP Solution File: SEU230+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU230+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.43s 2.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 6 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_105,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != set_union2(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8qz5r4zk/lgb.p',i_0_105) ).
cnf(i_0_100,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != unordered_pair(X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8qz5r4zk/lgb.p',i_0_100) ).
cnf(i_0_319,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk75_0,set_union2(esk75_0,unordered_pair(esk75_0,esk75_0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8qz5r4zk/lgb.p',i_0_319) ).
cnf(c_0_323,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != set_union2(X3,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X4) ),
i_0_105 ).
cnf(c_0_324,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X1 != X3
| X2 != unordered_pair(X3,X4) ),
i_0_100 ).
cnf(c_0_325,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk75_0,set_union2(esk75_0,unordered_pair(esk75_0,esk75_0))),
i_0_319 ).
cnf(c_0_326,plain,
( in(X1,set_union2(X2,X3))
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_323]) ).
cnf(c_0_327,plain,
in(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_324])]) ).
cnf(c_0_328,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_325,c_0_326]),c_0_327])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SEU230+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 12:03:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.43/2.35 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.43/2.35 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.43/2.35 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.43/2.35 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.43/2.35 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.43/2.35 #
% 7.43/2.35 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 7.43/2.35 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.43/2.35
% 7.43/2.35 # Proof found!
% 7.43/2.35 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.43/2.35 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.43/2.35 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.43/2.35
% 7.43/2.35 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.43/2.35 # User time : 0.026 s
% 7.43/2.35 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.43/2.35 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 7.43/2.35 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.43/2.35
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------