TSTP Solution File: SEU230+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU230+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:35:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   24 (   9 unt;   4 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   44 (   0 equ;  23 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(26,axiom,
    element(skf5(u),u),
    file('SEU230+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(28,axiom,
    ~ in(skc10,succ(skc10)),
    file('SEU230+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(31,axiom,
    equal(set_union2(u,u),u),
    file('SEU230+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(35,axiom,
    equal(set_union2(u,singleton(u)),succ(u)),
    file('SEU230+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(39,axiom,
    ( ~ empty(u)
    | ~ in(v,u) ),
    file('SEU230+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(41,axiom,
    ( ~ element(u,v)
    | empty(v)
    | in(u,v) ),
    file('SEU230+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(46,axiom,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ equal(v,singleton(w))
    | equal(u,w) ),
    file('SEU230+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(47,axiom,
    ( ~ equal(u,v)
    | ~ equal(w,singleton(v))
    | in(u,w) ),
    file('SEU230+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(49,axiom,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ equal(w,set_union2(x,v))
    | in(u,w) ),
    file('SEU230+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(59,plain,
    ( ~ in(skc10,u)
    | ~ equal(set_union2(v,u),succ(skc10)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[49,28]),
    [iquote('0:Res:49.2,28.0')] ).

cnf(110,plain,
    ( empty(u)
    | in(skf5(u),u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[26,41]),
    [iquote('0:Res:26.0,41.0')] ).

cnf(127,plain,
    ( ~ in(skc10,u)
    | ~ equal(u,succ(skc10)) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[31,59]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:31.0,59.1')] ).

cnf(133,plain,
    ( ~ equal(u,v)
    | in(u,singleton(v)) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[47]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:47.1')] ).

cnf(136,plain,
    ( ~ empty(singleton(u))
    | ~ equal(v,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[133,39]),
    [iquote('0:Res:133.1,39.1')] ).

cnf(139,plain,
    ~ empty(singleton(u)),
    inference(aed,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[136]),
    [iquote('0:AED:136.1')] ).

cnf(144,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,singleton(v))
    | equal(u,v) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[46]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:46.1')] ).

cnf(147,plain,
    ( empty(singleton(u))
    | equal(skf5(singleton(u)),u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[110,144]),
    [iquote('0:Res:110.1,144.0')] ).

cnf(150,plain,
    equal(skf5(singleton(u)),u),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[147,139]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:147.0,139.0')] ).

cnf(152,plain,
    ( empty(singleton(u))
    | in(u,singleton(u)) ),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[150,110]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:150.0,110.1')] ).

cnf(156,plain,
    in(u,singleton(u)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[152,139]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:152.0,139.0')] ).

cnf(165,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,singleton(v))
    | ~ equal(w,succ(v))
    | in(u,w) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[35,49]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:35.0,49.1')] ).

cnf(534,plain,
    ( ~ equal(u,succ(v))
    | in(v,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[156,165]),
    [iquote('0:Res:156.0,165.0')] ).

cnf(538,plain,
    ~ equal(u,succ(skc10)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[127,534]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:127.0,534.1')] ).

cnf(539,plain,
    $false,
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[538]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:538.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU230+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 20:03:18 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.49  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.49  SPASS derived 450 clauses, backtracked 5 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 273 clauses.
% 0.20/0.49  SPASS allocated 98029 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.49  SPASS spent	0:00:00.14 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.49  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.49  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.49  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.49  		0:00:00.04 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 24 :
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  Formulae used in the proof : existence_m1_subset_1 t10_ordinal1 idempotence_k2_xboole_0 d1_ordinal1 t7_boole t2_subset d1_tarski t1_boole d2_xboole_0
% 0.20/0.49  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------