TSTP Solution File: SEU227+3 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU227+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:18:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.47s 49.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  207 (  46 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   26 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  285 ( 121   ~; 130   |;  19   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  142 (  10 sgn  56   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d13_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2,X3] :
          ( X3 = relation_image(X1,X2)
        <=> ! [X4] :
              ( in(X4,X3)
            <=> ? [X5] :
                  ( in(ordered_pair(X5,X4),X1)
                  & in(X5,X2) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d13_relat_1) ).

fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d5_tarski) ).

fof(d4_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( X2 = relation_dom(X1)
        <=> ! [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X2)
            <=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d4_relat_1) ).

fof(d14_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2,X3] :
          ( X3 = relation_inverse_image(X1,X2)
        <=> ! [X4] :
              ( in(X4,X3)
            <=> ? [X5] :
                  ( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X1)
                  & in(X5,X2) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d14_relat_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(t146_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( subset(X1,relation_dom(X2))
       => subset(X1,relation_inverse_image(X2,relation_image(X2,X1))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t146_funct_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d3_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8,X9,X9,X11,X7,X8,X13] :
      ( ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_4(X6,X7,X8,X9),X9),X6)
        | ~ in(X9,X8)
        | X8 != relation_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(esk1_4(X6,X7,X8,X9),X7)
        | ~ in(X9,X8)
        | X8 != relation_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X11,X9),X6)
        | ~ in(X11,X7)
        | in(X9,X8)
        | X8 != relation_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(esk2_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X13,esk2_3(X6,X7,X8)),X6)
        | ~ in(X13,X7)
        | X8 = relation_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X6,X7,X8),esk2_3(X6,X7,X8)),X6)
        | in(esk2_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | X8 = relation_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(esk3_3(X6,X7,X8),X7)
        | in(esk2_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | X8 = relation_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d13_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : ordered_pair(X3,X4) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,X4),singleton(X3)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
      ( ( ~ in(X7,X6)
        | in(ordered_pair(X7,esk8_3(X5,X6,X7)),X5)
        | X6 != relation_dom(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X9),X5)
        | in(X7,X6)
        | X6 != relation_dom(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk9_2(X5,X6),X6)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk9_2(X5,X6),X11),X5)
        | X6 = relation_dom(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) )
      & ( in(esk9_2(X5,X6),X6)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk9_2(X5,X6),esk10_2(X5,X6)),X5)
        | X6 = relation_dom(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X8,X9,X9,X11,X7,X8,X13] :
      ( ( in(ordered_pair(X9,esk4_4(X6,X7,X8,X9)),X6)
        | ~ in(X9,X8)
        | X8 != relation_inverse_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(esk4_4(X6,X7,X8,X9),X7)
        | ~ in(X9,X8)
        | X8 != relation_inverse_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X9,X11),X6)
        | ~ in(X11,X7)
        | in(X9,X8)
        | X8 != relation_inverse_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( ~ in(esk5_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk5_3(X6,X7,X8),X13),X6)
        | ~ in(X13,X7)
        | X8 = relation_inverse_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk5_3(X6,X7,X8),esk6_3(X6,X7,X8)),X6)
        | in(esk5_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | X8 = relation_inverse_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(esk6_3(X6,X7,X8),X7)
        | in(esk5_3(X6,X7,X8),X8)
        | X8 = relation_inverse_image(X6,X7)
        | ~ relation(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d14_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( in(X4,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | X2 != relation_image(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X5,X3)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X4),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : unordered_pair(X3,X4) = unordered_pair(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X3,esk8_3(X1,X2,X3)),X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( in(X4,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | X2 != relation_inverse_image(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X5,X3)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( in(X4,X2)
    | X2 != relation_image(X1,X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X5,X3)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X5,X4),singleton(X5)),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,esk8_3(X1,X2,X3)),singleton(X3)),X1)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( in(X4,X2)
    | X2 != relation_inverse_image(X1,X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X5,X3)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X5),singleton(X4)),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_image(X3,X4)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(X5),unordered_pair(X5,X1)),X3)
    | ~ in(X5,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,esk8_3(X2,X3,X1))),X2)
    | X3 != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_inverse_image(X3,X4)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X5)),X3)
    | ~ in(X5,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( in(esk8_3(X1,X2,X3),X4)
    | X4 != relation_image(X1,X5)
    | X2 != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X5)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( relation(X2)
       => ( subset(X1,relation_dom(X2))
         => subset(X1,relation_inverse_image(X2,relation_image(X2,X1))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t146_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_inverse_image(X3,X4)
    | X5 != relation_dom(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(esk8_3(X3,X5,X1),X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X5) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( in(esk8_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_image(X1,X4))
    | X2 != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X4)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ in(X6,X4)
        | in(X6,X5) )
      & ( in(esk7_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk7_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk23_0)
    & subset(esk22_0,relation_dom(esk23_0))
    & ~ subset(esk22_0,relation_inverse_image(esk23_0,relation_image(esk23_0,esk22_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_inverse_image(X3,relation_image(X3,X4))
    | X5 != relation_dom(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X5)
    | ~ in(X1,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk22_0,relation_dom(esk23_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( in(X1,relation_inverse_image(X2,relation_image(X2,X3)))
    | X4 != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,relation_dom(esk23_0))
    | ~ in(X1,esk22_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk7_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,relation_inverse_image(X2,relation_image(X2,X3)))
    | relation_dom(esk23_0) != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,esk22_0)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,relation_inverse_image(X2,relation_image(X2,X3)))
    | relation_dom(esk23_0) != relation_dom(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(esk7_2(X1,relation_inverse_image(X2,relation_image(X2,X3))),esk22_0)
    | ~ in(esk7_2(X1,relation_inverse_image(X2,relation_image(X2,X3))),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk7_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk22_0,relation_inverse_image(X1,relation_image(X1,X2)))
    | relation_dom(esk23_0) != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(esk7_2(esk22_0,relation_inverse_image(X1,relation_image(X1,X2))),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(esk22_0,relation_inverse_image(esk23_0,relation_image(esk23_0,esk22_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk22_0,relation_inverse_image(X1,relation_image(X1,esk22_0)))
    | relation_dom(esk23_0) != relation_dom(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk23_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_41])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU227+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 01:29:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.34/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.44/46.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.44/46.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.44/46.46  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.44/46.46  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.47/49.65  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.47/49.65  
% 0.47/49.65  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.47/49.65  # OLD status Res
% 0.47/49.65  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 0.47/49.65  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 0.47/49.65  
% 0.47/49.65  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.47/49.65  # OLD status Res
% 0.47/49.65  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 0.47/49.65  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 0.47/49.65  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_75515770aeb32f68e33e9fbd9dff93f5a2e34f2e for 23 seconds:
% 0.47/49.65  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.47/49.65  
% 0.47/49.65  # Proof found!
% 0.47/49.65  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.47/49.65  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/49.65  # Proof object total steps             : 43
% 0.47/49.65  # Proof object clause steps            : 28
% 0.47/49.65  # Proof object formula steps           : 15
% 0.47/49.65  # Proof object conjectures             : 12
% 0.47/49.65  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 9
% 0.47/49.65  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.47/49.65  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 0.47/49.65  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 0.47/49.65  # Proof object generating inferences   : 13
% 0.47/49.65  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 6
% 0.47/49.65  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.47/49.65  # Parsed axioms                        : 40
% 0.47/49.65  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.47/49.65  # Initial clauses                      : 74
% 0.47/49.65  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.47/49.65  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 71
% 0.47/49.65  # Processed clauses                    : 6235
% 0.47/49.65  # ...of these trivial                  : 31
% 0.47/49.65  # ...subsumed                          : 4232
% 0.47/49.65  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1972
% 0.47/49.65  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.47/49.65  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.47/49.65  # Backward-subsumed                    : 151
% 0.47/49.65  # Backward-rewritten                   : 66
% 0.47/49.65  # Generated clauses                    : 114514
% 0.47/49.65  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 109282
% 0.47/49.65  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.47/49.65  # Paramodulations                      : 114251
% 0.47/49.65  # Factorizations                       : 36
% 0.47/49.65  # Equation resolutions                 : 227
% 0.47/49.65  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1755
% 0.47/49.65  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 60
% 0.47/49.65  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.47/49.65  #    Negative unit clauses             : 34
% 0.47/49.65  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1660
% 0.47/49.65  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 95363
% 0.47/49.65  # ...number of literals in the above   : 721237
% 0.47/49.65  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.47/49.65  # Current number of archived clauses   : 218
% 0.47/49.65  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 560886
% 0.47/49.65  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 46217
% 0.47/49.65  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3207
% 0.47/49.65  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11510
% 0.47/49.65  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.47/49.65  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 72
% 0.47/49.65  # BW rewrite match successes           : 19
% 0.47/49.65  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.47/49.65  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.47/49.65  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1928236
% 0.47/49.65  
% 0.47/49.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/49.65  # User time                : 2.541 s
% 0.47/49.65  # System time              : 0.074 s
% 0.47/49.65  # Total time               : 2.615 s
% 0.47/49.65  # Maximum resident set size: 86808 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------