TSTP Solution File: SEU226+3 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SEU226+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:12:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 11.67s 1.79s
% Output : Proof 11.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
relation(sK17),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t145_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
function(sK17),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t145_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
~ subset(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t145_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( in(sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)))
| subset(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ in(sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16),sK16)
| subset(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
sPE(sK16,sK16),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
sPE(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16))),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)))
| ~ in(sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)))
| ~ function(sK17)
| ~ relation(sK17)
| sPE(sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16),apply(sK17,sK0(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16)))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d12_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ sPE(sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16),apply(sK17,sK0(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16))))
| sPE(apply(sK17,sK0(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16))),sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)))
| ~ in(sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)))
| ~ function(sK17)
| ~ relation(sK17)
| in(sK0(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16)),relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d12_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
sPE(relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16),relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16),relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16))
| ~ in(sK0(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16)),relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16))
| ~ function(sK17)
| ~ relation(sK17)
| in(apply(sK17,sK0(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16))),sK16) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d13_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
( ~ sPE(apply(sK17,sK0(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16))),sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16))
| ~ sPE(sK16,sK16)
| ~ in(apply(sK17,sK0(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16),relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16))),sK16)
| in(sK4(relation_image(sK17,relation_inverse_image(sK17,sK16)),sK16),sK16) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SEU226+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 09:36:24 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 11.67/1.79 % symbols: 36
% 11.67/1.79 % clauses: 95
% 11.67/1.79 % start clauses: 3
% 11.67/1.79 % iterative deepening steps: 1807
% 11.67/1.79 % maximum path limit: 4
% 11.67/1.79 % literal attempts: 2918112
% 11.67/1.79 % depth failures: 2388320
% 11.67/1.79 % regularity failures: 80234
% 11.67/1.79 % tautology failures: 71109
% 11.67/1.79 % reductions: 29649
% 11.67/1.79 % extensions: 2887481
% 11.67/1.79 % SAT variables: 320058
% 11.67/1.79 % SAT clauses: 403074
% 11.67/1.79 % WalkSAT solutions: 403073
% 11.67/1.79 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 11.67/1.79 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 11.67/1.79 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------