TSTP Solution File: SEU226+3 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU226+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.69s 2.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   24 (   8 unt;   4 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   74 (  13 equ;  48 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_19,plain,
    ( in(apply(X1,X2),X3)
    | X4 != relation_inverse_image(X1,X3)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_4hvv2z5/input.p',i_0_19) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)) = X4
    | X3 != relation_image(X1,X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_4hvv2z5/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_13,plain,
    ( in(esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)
    | X3 != relation_image(X1,X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_4hvv2z5/input.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_22,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk5_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_4hvv2z5/input.p',i_0_22) ).

cnf(i_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk18_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_4hvv2z5/input.p',i_0_58) ).

cnf(i_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk18_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_4hvv2z5/input.p',i_0_57) ).

cnf(i_0_21,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk5_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_4hvv2z5/input.p',i_0_21) ).

cnf(i_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_image(esk18_0,relation_inverse_image(esk18_0,esk17_0)),esk17_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_4hvv2z5/input.p',i_0_56) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( in(apply(X1,X2),X3)
    | X4 != relation_inverse_image(X1,X3)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,X4) ),
    i_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)) = X4
    | X3 != relation_image(X1,X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != relation_inverse_image(X4,X2)
    | X5 != relation_image(X4,X6)
    | ~ in(esk1_4(X4,X6,X5,X1),X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X5)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ function(X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    ( in(esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)
    | X3 != relation_image(X1,X2)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != relation_inverse_image(X4,X2)
    | X5 != relation_image(X4,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X5)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ function(X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X3 != relation_image(X4,relation_inverse_image(X4,X2))
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ function(X4) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_71]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_image(X3,relation_inverse_image(X3,X2)))
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ function(X3) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_72]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk5_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    i_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    ( in(esk5_2(relation_image(X1,relation_inverse_image(X1,X2)),X3),X2)
    | subset(relation_image(X1,relation_inverse_image(X1,X2)),X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk18_0),
    i_0_58 ).

cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk18_0),
    i_0_57 ).

cnf(c_0_78,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk5_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    i_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk5_2(relation_image(esk18_0,relation_inverse_image(esk18_0,X1)),X2),X1)
    | subset(relation_image(esk18_0,relation_inverse_image(esk18_0,X1)),X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_76]),c_0_77])]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_image(esk18_0,relation_inverse_image(esk18_0,esk17_0)),esk17_0),
    i_0_56 ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    subset(relation_image(esk18_0,relation_inverse_image(esk18_0,X1)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_79]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SEU226+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 09:30:39 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.69/2.46  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.69/2.46  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.69/2.46  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.69/2.46  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 8.69/2.46  # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.69/2.46  #
% 8.69/2.46  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 8.69/2.46  
% 8.69/2.46  # Proof found!
% 8.69/2.46  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.69/2.46  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.69/2.46  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.69/2.46  
% 8.69/2.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.69/2.46  # User time                : 0.059 s
% 8.69/2.46  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 8.69/2.46  # Total time               : 0.062 s
% 8.69/2.46  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.69/2.46  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------