TSTP Solution File: SEU225+3 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : SEU225+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:25:21 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  176 (  42 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   27 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  230 (  90   ~;  93   |;  25   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   73 (   5 sgn;  37   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d4_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1) )
     => ! [X2,X3] :
          ( ( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
           => ( X3 = apply(X1,X2)
            <=> in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ) )
          & ( ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
           => ( X3 = apply(X1,X2)
            <=> X3 = empty_set ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2Bnmgxu7dc/E---3.1_15687.p',d4_funct_1) ).

fof(t68_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X2)
        & function(X2) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( ( relation(X3)
            & function(X3) )
         => ( X2 = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1)
          <=> ( relation_dom(X2) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X3),X1)
              & ! [X4] :
                  ( in(X4,relation_dom(X2))
                 => apply(X2,X4) = apply(X3,X4) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2Bnmgxu7dc/E---3.1_15687.p',t68_funct_1) ).

fof(fc4_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1) )
     => ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
        & function(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2Bnmgxu7dc/E---3.1_15687.p',fc4_funct_1) ).

fof(dt_k7_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2Bnmgxu7dc/E---3.1_15687.p',dt_k7_relat_1) ).

fof(t72_funct_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( relation(X3)
        & function(X3) )
     => ( in(X2,X1)
       => apply(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1),X2) = apply(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2Bnmgxu7dc/E---3.1_15687.p',t72_funct_1) ).

fof(l82_funct_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( relation(X3)
        & function(X3) )
     => ( in(X2,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1)))
      <=> ( in(X2,relation_dom(X3))
          & in(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2Bnmgxu7dc/E---3.1_15687.p',l82_funct_1) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( relation(X1)
        & function(X1) )
     => ! [X2,X3] :
          ( ( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
           => ( X3 = apply(X1,X2)
            <=> in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ) )
          & ( ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
           => ( X3 = apply(X1,X2)
            <=> X3 = empty_set ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d4_funct_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X67,X68,X69,X70] :
      ( ( relation_dom(X68) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X69),X67)
        | X68 != relation_dom_restriction(X69,X67)
        | ~ relation(X69)
        | ~ function(X69)
        | ~ relation(X68)
        | ~ function(X68) )
      & ( ~ in(X70,relation_dom(X68))
        | apply(X68,X70) = apply(X69,X70)
        | X68 != relation_dom_restriction(X69,X67)
        | ~ relation(X69)
        | ~ function(X69)
        | ~ relation(X68)
        | ~ function(X68) )
      & ( in(esk12_3(X67,X68,X69),relation_dom(X68))
        | relation_dom(X68) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X69),X67)
        | X68 = relation_dom_restriction(X69,X67)
        | ~ relation(X69)
        | ~ function(X69)
        | ~ relation(X68)
        | ~ function(X68) )
      & ( apply(X68,esk12_3(X67,X68,X69)) != apply(X69,esk12_3(X67,X68,X69))
        | relation_dom(X68) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X69),X67)
        | X68 = relation_dom_restriction(X69,X67)
        | ~ relation(X69)
        | ~ function(X69)
        | ~ relation(X68)
        | ~ function(X68) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t68_funct_1])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X33,X34] :
      ( ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X33,X34))
        | ~ relation(X33)
        | ~ function(X33) )
      & ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X33,X34))
        | ~ relation(X33)
        | ~ function(X33) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc4_funct_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] :
      ( ~ relation(X19)
      | relation(relation_dom_restriction(X19,X20)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k7_relat_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X14,X15,X16] :
      ( ( X16 != apply(X14,X15)
        | in(ordered_pair(X15,X16),X14)
        | ~ in(X15,relation_dom(X14))
        | ~ relation(X14)
        | ~ function(X14) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X15,X16),X14)
        | X16 = apply(X14,X15)
        | ~ in(X15,relation_dom(X14))
        | ~ relation(X14)
        | ~ function(X14) )
      & ( X16 != apply(X14,X15)
        | X16 = empty_set
        | in(X15,relation_dom(X14))
        | ~ relation(X14)
        | ~ function(X14) )
      & ( X16 != empty_set
        | X16 = apply(X14,X15)
        | in(X15,relation_dom(X14))
        | ~ relation(X14)
        | ~ function(X14) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( relation(X3)
          & function(X3) )
       => ( in(X2,X1)
         => apply(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1),X2) = apply(X3,X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t72_funct_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( apply(X2,X1) = apply(X3,X1)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | X2 != relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X38,X39,X40] :
      ( ( in(X39,relation_dom(X40))
        | ~ in(X39,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X40,X38)))
        | ~ relation(X40)
        | ~ function(X40) )
      & ( in(X39,X38)
        | ~ in(X39,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X40,X38)))
        | ~ relation(X40)
        | ~ function(X40) )
      & ( ~ in(X39,relation_dom(X40))
        | ~ in(X39,X38)
        | in(X39,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X40,X38)))
        | ~ relation(X40)
        | ~ function(X40) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l82_funct_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | in(X3,relation_dom(X2))
    | X1 != apply(X2,X3)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk15_0)
    & function(esk15_0)
    & in(esk14_0,esk13_0)
    & apply(relation_dom_restriction(esk15_0,esk13_0),esk14_0) != apply(esk15_0,esk14_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X1,X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3)))
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( apply(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    apply(relation_dom_restriction(esk15_0,esk13_0),esk14_0) != apply(esk15_0,esk14_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X1,X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk15_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk15_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk14_0,esk13_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = empty_set
    | in(X3,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk14_0,relation_dom(esk15_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(esk15_0,X1) = empty_set
    | in(X1,relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = empty_set
    | in(X3,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    apply(esk15_0,esk14_0) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3)))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ function(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(esk15_0,X1),X2) = empty_set
    | in(X2,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk15_0,X1))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    apply(relation_dom_restriction(esk15_0,esk13_0),esk14_0) != empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(relation_dom_restriction(esk15_0,X1),X2) = empty_set
    | in(X2,relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_27]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.10  % Problem    : SEU225+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 09:06:35 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2Bnmgxu7dc/E---3.1_15687.p
% 0.16/0.51  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 15765 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.51  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.51  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_B07----S_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_B07----D_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 15772 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.51  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.51  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_B07----S_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.51  
% 0.16/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.51  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 46
% 0.16/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.16/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 76
% 0.16/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.16/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 73
% 0.16/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 1134
% 0.16/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.16/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 722
% 0.16/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 407
% 0.16/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 0.16/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 31
% 0.16/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 22
% 0.16/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 2879
% 0.16/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2318
% 0.16/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 40
% 0.16/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 2872
% 0.16/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 0.16/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2908
% 0.16/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 283
% 0.16/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 45
% 0.16/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.16/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 15
% 0.16/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 221
% 0.16/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1245
% 0.16/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 6709
% 0.16/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 120
% 0.16/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15747
% 0.16/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6551
% 0.16/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 543
% 0.16/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 518
% 0.16/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 32
% 0.16/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 30
% 0.16/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 51376
% 0.16/0.51  
% 0.16/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.51  # User time                : 0.068 s
% 0.16/0.51  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.16/0.51  # Total time               : 0.072 s
% 0.16/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1896 pages
% 0.16/0.51  
% 0.16/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.51  # User time                : 0.325 s
% 0.16/0.51  # System time              : 0.025 s
% 0.16/0.51  # Total time               : 0.350 s
% 0.16/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
% 0.16/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------