TSTP Solution File: SEU223+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU223+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:18:00 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 82 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 27 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 106 ( 42 ~; 40 |; 14 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 15 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 4 sgn 23 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t70_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X2,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1)))
=> apply(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1),X2) = apply(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t70_funct_1) ).
fof(t68_funct_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( X2 = relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1)
<=> ( relation_dom(X2) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X3),X1)
& ! [X4] :
( in(X4,relation_dom(X2))
=> apply(X2,X4) = apply(X3,X4) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t68_funct_1) ).
fof(fc4_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
& function(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc4_funct_1) ).
fof(dt_k7_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X1)
=> relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k7_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X2,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1)))
=> apply(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1),X2) = apply(X3,X2) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t70_funct_1]) ).
fof(c_0_5,lemma,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( relation_dom(X6) = set_intersection2(relation_dom(X7),X5)
| X6 != relation_dom_restriction(X7,X5)
| ~ relation(X7)
| ~ function(X7)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,relation_dom(X6))
| apply(X6,X8) = apply(X7,X8)
| X6 != relation_dom_restriction(X7,X5)
| ~ relation(X7)
| ~ function(X7)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6) )
& ( in(esk79_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X6))
| relation_dom(X6) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X7),X5)
| X6 = relation_dom_restriction(X7,X5)
| ~ relation(X7)
| ~ function(X7)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6) )
& ( apply(X6,esk79_3(X5,X6,X7)) != apply(X7,esk79_3(X5,X6,X7))
| relation_dom(X6) != set_intersection2(relation_dom(X7),X5)
| X6 = relation_dom_restriction(X7,X5)
| ~ relation(X7)
| ~ function(X7)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t68_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X3,X4,X4] :
( ( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3) )
& ( function(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc4_funct_1])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| relation(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k7_relat_1])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk82_0)
& function(esk82_0)
& in(esk81_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk82_0,esk80_0)))
& apply(relation_dom_restriction(esk82_0,esk80_0),esk81_0) != apply(esk82_0,esk81_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,lemma,
( apply(X1,X4) = apply(X2,X4)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| X1 != relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( function(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
apply(relation_dom_restriction(esk82_0,esk80_0),esk81_0) != apply(esk82_0,esk81_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,lemma,
( apply(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X1,X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk82_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
function(esk82_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
in(esk81_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk82_0,esk80_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.13 % Problem : SEU223+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 07:36:13 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.041 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.24/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 238
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 457
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 26
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 431
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 1366
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 55
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 433
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 878
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 51
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 7
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 22
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 10209
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 9121
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 75
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 10112
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 14
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 83
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 842
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 138
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 77
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 624
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7911
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 32709
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 33
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 83744
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 45457
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 300
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5963
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 75
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 35
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 193082
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.219 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.017 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.236 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 13956 pages
% 0.24/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.24/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------