TSTP Solution File: SEU223+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SEU223+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:24:56 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.37s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SEU223+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 09:46:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.12/0.36 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.12/0.36 #
% 0.12/0.36 # Number of axioms: 52 Number of unprocessed: 52
% 0.12/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.36 # 52 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 4 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.36 # There are 4 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.36 # Found 30 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.36 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.36 # 4 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.36 # 22 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.36 # 30 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.36 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 4
% 0.12/0.36 # Returning from population with 19 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.36 # We now have 19 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (relation(empty_set))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_12, plain, (relation(empty_set))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (relation(esk1_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (relation(esk2_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (relation(esk4_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_25, plain, (relation(esk5_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_28, plain, (relation(esk6_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_46, plain, (relation(esk9_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (relation(esk12_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (relation_empty_yielding(empty_set))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (relation_empty_yielding(esk1_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_7, plain, (function(esk2_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (function(esk4_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_45, plain, (function(esk9_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (function(esk12_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_6, plain, (one_to_one(esk2_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (empty(empty_set))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_13, plain, (empty(empty_set))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_14, plain, (empty(empty_set))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (empty(esk4_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_26, plain, (empty(esk5_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_33, plain, (empty(esk7_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (~empty(esk6_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~empty(esk8_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_36, plain, (X1=empty_set|~empty(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_27, plain, (relation(X1)|~empty(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (function(X1)|~empty(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (set_intersection2(X1,empty_set)=empty_set)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_39, plain, (set_intersection2(X1,X1)=X1)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (X1=X2|~empty(X2)|~empty(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_31, plain, (relation(relation_dom(X1))|~empty(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_32, plain, (empty(relation_dom(X1))|~empty(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (element(esk3_1(X1),X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_22, plain, (one_to_one(X1)|~relation(X1)|~function(X1)|~empty(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (set_intersection2(X1,X2)=set_intersection2(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (empty(X1)|~relation(X1)|~empty(relation_dom(X1)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (~empty(X2)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_50, plain, (element(X1,X2)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_44, plain, (relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))|~relation(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_35, plain, (empty(X2)|in(X1,X2)|~element(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))|~relation(X1)|~relation_empty_yielding(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))|~relation(X1)|~function(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_49, plain, (relation(set_intersection2(X1,X2))|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (relation_empty_yielding(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))|~relation(X1)|~relation_empty_yielding(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (function(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))|~relation(X1)|~function(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_40, plain, (~in(X2,X1)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (in(esk11_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk12_0,esk10_0))))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (apply(relation_dom_restriction(esk12_0,esk10_0),esk11_0)!=apply(esk12_0,esk11_0))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (relation_dom(X1)=set_intersection2(relation_dom(X2),X3)|X1!=relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3)|~relation(X2)|~relation(X1)|~function(X2)|~function(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_58, plain, (apply(X2,X1)=apply(X3,X1)|X2!=relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~function(X3)|~function(X2)|~in(X1,relation_dom(X2)))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (X2=relation_dom_restriction(X3,X1)|in(esk13_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X2))|relation_dom(X2)!=set_intersection2(relation_dom(X3),X1)|~relation(X3)|~relation(X2)|~function(X3)|~function(X2))).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (X1=relation_dom_restriction(X3,X2)|relation_dom(X1)!=set_intersection2(relation_dom(X3),X2)|apply(X1,esk13_3(X2,X1,X3))!=apply(X3,esk13_3(X2,X1,X3))|~relation(X3)|~relation(X1)|~function(X3)|~function(X1))).
% 0.12/0.37 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.37 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 5 steps
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (function(esk12_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (function(esk12_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_48])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_243, plain, (~relation(esk12_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_55])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_242, plain, (relation(relation_dom_restriction(esk12_0,X6))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_44])).
% 0.12/0.37 cnf(i_0_713, plain, (relation(relation_dom_restriction(relation_dom_restriction(esk12_0,X6),X5))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_713, ...])).
% 0.12/0.37 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.37 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.37 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.37 # Creating equality axioms
% 0.12/0.37 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.12/0.37 # Child (23308) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.37 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------