TSTP Solution File: SEU221+3 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU221+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.70s 2.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   41 (  15 unt;   6 nHn;  41 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  105 (  20 equ;  63 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_13,plain,
    ( relation(function_inverse(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ouwb5al4/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_80,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk18_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ouwb5al4/lgb.p',i_0_80) ).

cnf(i_0_81,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk18_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ouwb5al4/lgb.p',i_0_81) ).

cnf(i_0_74,plain,
    ( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(X2)
    | X2 != function_inverse(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ouwb5al4/lgb.p',i_0_74) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( function(function_inverse(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ouwb5al4/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    ( one_to_one(X1)
    | in(esk2_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ouwb5al4/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_78,negated_conjecture,
    ~ one_to_one(function_inverse(esk18_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ouwb5al4/lgb.p',i_0_78) ).

cnf(i_0_79,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one(esk18_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ouwb5al4/lgb.p',i_0_79) ).

cnf(i_0_10,plain,
    ( one_to_one(X1)
    | in(esk1_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ouwb5al4/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_8,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = apply(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | one_to_one(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ouwb5al4/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(i_0_76,plain,
    ( apply(X1,apply(function_inverse(X1),X2)) = X2
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ one_to_one(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ouwb5al4/lgb.p',i_0_76) ).

cnf(i_0_7,plain,
    ( one_to_one(X1)
    | esk1_1(X1) != esk2_1(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ouwb5al4/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(c_0_94,plain,
    ( relation(function_inverse(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_95,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk18_0),
    i_0_80 ).

cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk18_0),
    i_0_81 ).

cnf(c_0_97,plain,
    ( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(X2)
    | X2 != function_inverse(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ function(X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
    i_0_74 ).

cnf(c_0_98,plain,
    ( function(function_inverse(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_99,plain,
    ( one_to_one(X1)
    | in(esk2_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_100,negated_conjecture,
    relation(function_inverse(esk18_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_95]),c_0_96])]) ).

cnf(c_0_101,negated_conjecture,
    ~ one_to_one(function_inverse(esk18_0)),
    i_0_78 ).

cnf(c_0_102,plain,
    ( relation_dom(function_inverse(X1)) = relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_97]),c_0_98]),c_0_94]) ).

cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one(esk18_0),
    i_0_79 ).

cnf(c_0_104,plain,
    ( one_to_one(X1)
    | in(esk1_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_105,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk2_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)),relation_dom(function_inverse(esk18_0)))
    | ~ function(function_inverse(esk18_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_100]),c_0_101]) ).

cnf(c_0_106,negated_conjecture,
    relation_dom(function_inverse(esk18_0)) = relation_rng(esk18_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_102,c_0_103]),c_0_96]),c_0_95])]) ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = apply(X1,esk2_1(X1))
    | one_to_one(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_108,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)),relation_dom(function_inverse(esk18_0)))
    | ~ function(function_inverse(esk18_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_100]),c_0_101]) ).

cnf(c_0_109,plain,
    ( apply(X1,apply(function_inverse(X1),X2)) = X2
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ one_to_one(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
    i_0_76 ).

cnf(c_0_110,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk2_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)),relation_rng(esk18_0))
    | ~ function(function_inverse(esk18_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_106]) ).

cnf(c_0_111,negated_conjecture,
    ( apply(function_inverse(esk18_0),esk2_1(function_inverse(esk18_0))) = apply(function_inverse(esk18_0),esk1_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)))
    | ~ function(function_inverse(esk18_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_100]),c_0_101]) ).

cnf(c_0_112,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)),relation_rng(esk18_0))
    | ~ function(function_inverse(esk18_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_106]) ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    ( one_to_one(X1)
    | esk1_1(X1) != esk2_1(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_114,plain,
    ( apply(esk18_0,apply(function_inverse(esk18_0),esk2_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)))) = esk2_1(function_inverse(esk18_0))
    | ~ function(function_inverse(esk18_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110]),c_0_96]),c_0_95]),c_0_103])]) ).

cnf(c_0_115,plain,
    apply(function_inverse(esk18_0),esk2_1(function_inverse(esk18_0))) = apply(function_inverse(esk18_0),esk1_1(function_inverse(esk18_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_98]),c_0_96]),c_0_95])]) ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    ( apply(esk18_0,apply(function_inverse(esk18_0),esk1_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)))) = esk1_1(function_inverse(esk18_0))
    | ~ function(function_inverse(esk18_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_112]),c_0_96]),c_0_95]),c_0_103])]) ).

cnf(c_0_117,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk2_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)) != esk1_1(function_inverse(esk18_0))
    | ~ function(function_inverse(esk18_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_113]),c_0_100])]) ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    ( apply(esk18_0,apply(function_inverse(esk18_0),esk1_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)))) = esk2_1(function_inverse(esk18_0))
    | ~ function(function_inverse(esk18_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_115]) ).

cnf(c_0_119,plain,
    apply(esk18_0,apply(function_inverse(esk18_0),esk1_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)))) = esk1_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_98]),c_0_96]),c_0_95])]) ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    esk2_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)) != esk1_1(function_inverse(esk18_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_98]),c_0_96]),c_0_95])]) ).

cnf(c_0_121,plain,
    ~ function(function_inverse(esk18_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_119]),c_0_120]) ).

cnf(c_0_122,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_121,c_0_98]),c_0_96]),c_0_95])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SEU221+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 11:38:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.70/2.31  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.70/2.31  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.70/2.31  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.70/2.31  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 7.70/2.31  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.70/2.31  #
% 7.70/2.31  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.70/2.31  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.70/2.31  
% 7.70/2.31  # Proof found!
% 7.70/2.31  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.70/2.31  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.70/2.31  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.70/2.31  
% 7.70/2.31  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.70/2.31  # User time                : 0.030 s
% 7.70/2.31  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 7.70/2.31  # Total time               : 0.033 s
% 7.70/2.31  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.70/2.31  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------