TSTP Solution File: SEU219+3 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU219+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:35:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (   0 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    relation(skc9),
    file('SEU219+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    function(skc9),
    file('SEU219+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    one_to_one(skc9),
    file('SEU219+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(54,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | equal(relation_dom(relation_inverse(u)),relation_rng(u)) ),
    file('SEU219+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(55,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(u)
    | equal(relation_rng(relation_inverse(u)),relation_dom(u)) ),
    file('SEU219+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(62,axiom,
    ( ~ equal(relation_dom(function_inverse(skc9)),relation_rng(skc9))
    | ~ equal(relation_rng(function_inverse(skc9)),relation_dom(skc9)) ),
    file('SEU219+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(63,axiom,
    ( ~ one_to_one(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(u)
    | equal(relation_inverse(u),function_inverse(u)) ),
    file('SEU219+3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(66,plain,
    ( ~ relation(skc9)
    | ~ function(skc9)
    | equal(relation_inverse(skc9),function_inverse(skc9)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3,63]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3.0,63.2')] ).

cnf(75,plain,
    equal(relation_dom(relation_inverse(skc9)),relation_rng(skc9)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,54]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,54.0')] ).

cnf(76,plain,
    equal(relation_rng(relation_inverse(skc9)),relation_dom(skc9)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,55]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,55.0')] ).

cnf(81,plain,
    equal(relation_inverse(skc9),function_inverse(skc9)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[66,1,2]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:66.0,66.1,1.0,2.0')] ).

cnf(84,plain,
    equal(relation_dom(function_inverse(skc9)),relation_rng(skc9)),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[81,75]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:81.0,75.0')] ).

cnf(85,plain,
    equal(relation_rng(function_inverse(skc9)),relation_dom(skc9)),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[81,76]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:81.0,76.0')] ).

cnf(86,plain,
    ( ~ equal(relation_rng(skc9),relation_rng(skc9))
    | ~ equal(relation_rng(function_inverse(skc9)),relation_dom(skc9)) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[84,62]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:84.0,62.0')] ).

cnf(87,plain,
    ~ equal(relation_rng(function_inverse(skc9)),relation_dom(skc9)),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[86]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:86.0')] ).

cnf(88,plain,
    ~ equal(relation_dom(skc9),relation_dom(skc9)),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[85,87]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:85.0,87.0')] ).

cnf(89,plain,
    $false,
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[88]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:88.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SEU219+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 19:30:07 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.45  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS derived 19 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 72 clauses.
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS allocated 97714 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.45  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  
% 0.21/0.45  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 17 :
% 0.21/0.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.45  Formulae used in the proof : t55_funct_1 t37_relat_1 d9_funct_1
% 0.21/0.45  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------