TSTP Solution File: SEU219+3 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : SEU219+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:12:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.09s 0.29s
% Output : Proof 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
relation(sK11),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
function(sK11),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
one_to_one(sK11),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_dom(sK11),relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)))
| ~ sPE(relation_rng(sK11),relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t55_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ function(sK11)
| ~ relation(sK11)
| ~ one_to_one(sK11)
| sPE(function_inverse(sK11),relation_inverse(sK11)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d9_funct_1)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ relation(sK11)
| sPE(relation_dom(sK11),relation_rng(relation_inverse(sK11))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_relat_1)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ relation(sK11)
| sPE(relation_rng(sK11),relation_dom(relation_inverse(sK11))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_relat_1)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ sPE(function_inverse(sK11),relation_inverse(sK11))
| sPE(relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)),relation_dom(relation_inverse(sK11))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ sPE(function_inverse(sK11),relation_inverse(sK11))
| sPE(relation_inverse(sK11),function_inverse(sK11)) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_dom(sK11),relation_rng(relation_inverse(sK11)))
| ~ sPE(relation_rng(relation_inverse(sK11)),relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11)))
| sPE(relation_dom(sK11),relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_inverse(sK11),function_inverse(sK11))
| sPE(relation_rng(relation_inverse(sK11)),relation_rng(function_inverse(sK11))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_rng(sK11),relation_dom(relation_inverse(sK11)))
| ~ sPE(relation_dom(relation_inverse(sK11)),relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)))
| sPE(relation_rng(sK11),relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
( ~ sPE(relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11)),relation_dom(relation_inverse(sK11)))
| sPE(relation_dom(relation_inverse(sK11)),relation_dom(function_inverse(sK11))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : SEU219+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.09/0.09 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.09/0.29 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 19:28:02 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.29 % symbols: 28
% 0.09/0.29 % clauses: 82
% 0.09/0.29 % start clauses: 4
% 0.09/0.29 % iterative deepening steps: 35
% 0.09/0.29 % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.09/0.29 % literal attempts: 6659
% 0.09/0.29 % depth failures: 5943
% 0.09/0.29 % regularity failures: 35
% 0.09/0.29 % tautology failures: 18
% 0.09/0.29 % reductions: 35
% 0.09/0.29 % extensions: 6502
% 0.09/0.29 % SAT variables: 1089
% 0.09/0.29 % SAT clauses: 1101
% 0.09/0.29 % WalkSAT solutions: 1097
% 0.09/0.29 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.09/0.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.29 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------