TSTP Solution File: SEU219+2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SEU219+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:25:19 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.35s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 53 ( 20 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 57 ( 22 ~; 18 |; 10 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn; 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t55_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
=> ( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X1))
& relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.B4EZN9BZ4s/E---3.1_12593.p',t55_funct_1) ).
fof(t37_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(relation_inverse(X1))
& relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(relation_inverse(X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.B4EZN9BZ4s/E---3.1_12593.p',t37_relat_1) ).
fof(d9_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
=> function_inverse(X1) = relation_inverse(X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.B4EZN9BZ4s/E---3.1_12593.p',d9_funct_1) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
=> ( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(function_inverse(X1))
& relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(function_inverse(X1)) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t55_funct_1]) ).
fof(c_0_4,lemma,
! [X146] :
( ( relation_rng(X146) = relation_dom(relation_inverse(X146))
| ~ relation(X146) )
& ( relation_dom(X146) = relation_rng(relation_inverse(X146))
| ~ relation(X146) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t37_relat_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X27] :
( ~ relation(X27)
| ~ function(X27)
| ~ one_to_one(X27)
| function_inverse(X27) = relation_inverse(X27) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d9_funct_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk1_0)
& function(esk1_0)
& one_to_one(esk1_0)
& ( relation_rng(esk1_0) != relation_dom(function_inverse(esk1_0))
| relation_dom(esk1_0) != relation_rng(function_inverse(esk1_0)) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,lemma,
( relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(relation_inverse(X1))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( function_inverse(X1) = relation_inverse(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( relation_rng(esk1_0) != relation_dom(function_inverse(esk1_0))
| relation_dom(esk1_0) != relation_rng(function_inverse(esk1_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,lemma,
( relation_rng(function_inverse(X1)) = relation_dom(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
one_to_one(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
function(esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,lemma,
( relation_rng(X1) = relation_dom(relation_inverse(X1))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom(function_inverse(esk1_0)) != relation_rng(esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,lemma,
( relation_dom(function_inverse(X1)) = relation_rng(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.13 % Problem : SEU219+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 08:58:58 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.B4EZN9BZ4s/E---3.1_12593.p
% 0.35/0.62 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.35/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.62 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.62 # new_bool_1 with pid 12673 completed with status 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.35/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.62 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.35/0.62 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.35/0.62 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.35/0.62 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.62 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 12675 completed with status 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.35/0.62 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/0.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.62 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/0.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.62 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.35/0.62 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.35/0.62 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.35/0.62 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 163s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62 # Proof found!
% 0.35/0.62 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.35/0.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.35/0.62 # Parsed axioms : 231
% 0.35/0.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 145
% 0.35/0.62 # Initial clauses : 183
% 0.35/0.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.35/0.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 179
% 0.35/0.62 # Processed clauses : 587
% 0.35/0.62 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.35/0.62 # ...subsumed : 212
% 0.35/0.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 368
% 0.35/0.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 20
% 0.35/0.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Backward-subsumed : 10
% 0.35/0.62 # Backward-rewritten : 17
% 0.35/0.62 # Generated clauses : 2869
% 0.35/0.62 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2496
% 0.35/0.62 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 27
% 0.35/0.62 # Paramodulations : 2827
% 0.35/0.62 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.35/0.62 # NegExts : 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Equation resolutions : 40
% 0.35/0.62 # Total rewrite steps : 815
% 0.35/0.62 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.62 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.62 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.62 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.62 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.62 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 338
% 0.35/0.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 32
% 0.35/0.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Negative unit clauses : 15
% 0.35/0.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 291
% 0.35/0.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2033
% 0.35/0.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 11237
% 0.35/0.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 27
% 0.35/0.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20962
% 0.35/0.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8531
% 0.35/0.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 174
% 0.35/0.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1713
% 0.35/0.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.35/0.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 12
% 0.35/0.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.35/0.62 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.35/0.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 53303
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/0.62 # User time : 0.084 s
% 0.35/0.62 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.35/0.62 # Total time : 0.092 s
% 0.35/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 2424 pages
% 0.35/0.62
% 0.35/0.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/0.62 # User time : 0.088 s
% 0.35/0.62 # System time : 0.011 s
% 0.35/0.62 # Total time : 0.100 s
% 0.35/0.62 # Maximum resident set size: 1912 pages
% 0.35/0.62 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.35/0.62 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------