TSTP Solution File: SEU217+3 by lazyCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem : SEU217+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 11:54:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SEU217+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 20:42:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c0, axiom,
% 0.12/0.35 in(sK12,sK11)).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c1, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 in(sK12,sK11),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c2, axiom,
% 0.12/0.35 apply(X0,X1) = X1 | ~in(X1,X2) | ~sP0(X0,X2)).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(a0, assumption,
% 0.12/0.35 sK12 = X1).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(a1, assumption,
% 0.12/0.35 sK11 = X2).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c3, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 $false,
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c4, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 apply(X0,X1) = X1 | ~sP0(X0,X2),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c5, axiom,
% 0.12/0.35 sK12 != apply(identity_relation(sK11),sK12)).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(a2, assumption,
% 0.12/0.35 apply(identity_relation(sK11),sK12) = apply(X0,X1)).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c6, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 ~sP0(X0,X2),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c7, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 $false,
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c8, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 sK12 != X1,
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(a3, assumption,
% 0.12/0.35 sK12 = X1).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c9, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 $false,
% 0.12/0.35 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a3])], [c8])).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c10, axiom,
% 0.12/0.35 sP0(identity_relation(X3),X3) | ~sP1(X3,identity_relation(X3))).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(a4, assumption,
% 0.12/0.35 X0 = identity_relation(X3)).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(a5, assumption,
% 0.12/0.35 X2 = X3).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c11, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 $false,
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c6, c10])).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c12, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 ~sP1(X3,identity_relation(X3)),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c6, c10])).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c13, axiom,
% 0.12/0.35 sP1(X4,X5) | ~function(X5) | ~relation(X5)).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(a6, assumption,
% 0.12/0.35 X3 = X4).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(a7, assumption,
% 0.12/0.35 identity_relation(X3) = X5).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c14, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 $false,
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c12, c13])).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c15, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 ~function(X5) | ~relation(X5),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c12, c13])).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c16, axiom,
% 0.12/0.35 function(identity_relation(X6))).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(a8, assumption,
% 0.12/0.35 X5 = identity_relation(X6)).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c17, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 ~relation(X5),
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c15, c16])).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c18, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 $false,
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c15, c16])).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c19, axiom,
% 0.12/0.35 relation(identity_relation(X7))).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(a9, assumption,
% 0.12/0.35 X5 = identity_relation(X7)).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c20, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 $false,
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a9])], [c17, c19])).
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c21, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 $false,
% 0.12/0.35 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a9])], [c17, c19])).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 cnf(c22, plain,
% 0.12/0.35 $false,
% 0.12/0.35 inference(constraint_solving, [
% 0.12/0.35 bind(X0, identity_relation(sK11)),
% 0.12/0.35 bind(X1, sK12),
% 0.12/0.35 bind(X2, sK11),
% 0.12/0.35 bind(X3, sK11),
% 0.12/0.35 bind(X4, sK11),
% 0.12/0.35 bind(X5, identity_relation(X3)),
% 0.12/0.35 bind(X6, sK11),
% 0.12/0.35 bind(X7, sK11)
% 0.12/0.35 ],
% 0.12/0.35 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9])).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------