%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU217+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.64s 2.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   21 (   7 equ;  11 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_46,plain,
    ( apply(X1,X2) = X2
    | X1 != identity_relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dra5hysz/lgb.p',i_0_46) ).

cnf(i_0_24,plain,
    function(identity_relation(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dra5hysz/lgb.p',i_0_24) ).

cnf(i_0_25,plain,
    relation(identity_relation(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dra5hysz/lgb.p',i_0_25) ).

cnf(i_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk11_0,esk10_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dra5hysz/lgb.p',i_0_43) ).

cnf(i_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    apply(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0) != esk11_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-dra5hysz/lgb.p',i_0_42) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( apply(X1,X2) = X2
    | X1 != identity_relation(X3)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,X3) ),
    i_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    function(identity_relation(X1)),
    i_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    relation(identity_relation(X1)),
    i_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( apply(identity_relation(X1),X2) = X2
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_52]),c_0_53]),c_0_54])]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk11_0,esk10_0),
    i_0_43 ).

cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    apply(identity_relation(esk10_0),esk11_0) != esk11_0,
    i_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),c_0_57]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13  % Problem  : SEU217+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 20:27:16 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.64/2.38  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.64/2.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.64/2.38  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.64/2.38  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 8.64/2.38  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 8.64/2.38  #
% 8.64/2.38  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 8.64/2.38  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.64/2.38  
% 8.64/2.38  # Proof found!
% 8.64/2.38  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.64/2.38  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.64/2.38  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.64/2.38  
% 8.64/2.38  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.64/2.38  # User time                : 0.027 s
% 8.64/2.38  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 8.64/2.38  # Total time               : 0.031 s
% 8.64/2.38  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.64/2.38  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------