TSTP Solution File: SEU217+3 by Drodi---3.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU217+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -learnfrom(drodi.lrn) -timeout(%d) %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed May 31 12:36:19 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  121 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  130 (  54   ~;  48   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   58 (;  54   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( element(A,B)
     => ( empty(B)
        | in(A,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [A] : relation(identity_relation(A)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(identity_relation(A))
      & function(identity_relation(A)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( in(A,B)
     => element(A,B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ~ ( in(A,B)
        & empty(B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f30,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( in(B,A)
     => apply(identity_relation(A),B) = B ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( in(B,A)
       => apply(identity_relation(A),B) = B ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f30]) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( relation(B)
        & function(B) )
     => ( B = identity_relation(A)
      <=> ( relation_dom(B) = A
          & ! [C] :
              ( in(C,A)
             => apply(B,C) = C ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p') ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ element(A,B)
      | empty(B)
      | in(A,B) ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(esa)],[f11]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ element(X0,X1)
      | empty(X1)
      | in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f53]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f18]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ( ! [A] : relation(identity_relation(A))
    & ! [A] : function(identity_relation(A)) ),
    inference(miniscoping,[status(esa)],[f19]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ! [X0] : function(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f73]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ in(A,B)
      | element(A,B) ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(esa)],[f28]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X0,X1)
      | element(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f99]) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ in(A,B)
      | ~ empty(B) ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(esa)],[f29]) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ! [B] :
      ( ! [A] : ~ in(A,B)
      | ~ empty(B) ),
    inference(miniscoping,[status(esa)],[f101]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X0,X1)
      | ~ empty(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f102]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( in(B,A)
      & apply(identity_relation(A),B) != B ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(esa)],[f31]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ( in(sk0_10,sk0_9)
    & apply(identity_relation(sk0_9),sk0_10) != sk0_10 ),
    inference(skolemization,[status(esa)],[f104]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    in(sk0_10,sk0_9),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f105]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    apply(identity_relation(sk0_9),sk0_10) != sk0_10,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f105]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ relation(B)
      | ~ function(B)
      | ( B = identity_relation(A)
      <=> ( relation_dom(B) = A
          & ! [C] :
              ( ~ in(C,A)
              | apply(B,C) = C ) ) ) ),
    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(esa)],[f32]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ relation(B)
      | ~ function(B)
      | ( ( B != identity_relation(A)
          | ( relation_dom(B) = A
            & ! [C] :
                ( ~ in(C,A)
                | apply(B,C) = C ) ) )
        & ( B = identity_relation(A)
          | relation_dom(B) != A
          | ? [C] :
              ( in(C,A)
              & apply(B,C) != C ) ) ) ),
    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(esa)],[f108]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ! [B] :
      ( ~ relation(B)
      | ~ function(B)
      | ( ! [A] :
            ( B != identity_relation(A)
            | ( relation_dom(B) = A
              & ! [C] :
                  ( ~ in(C,A)
                  | apply(B,C) = C ) ) )
        & ! [A] :
            ( B = identity_relation(A)
            | relation_dom(B) != A
            | ? [C] :
                ( in(C,A)
                & apply(B,C) != C ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscoping,[status(esa)],[f109]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    ! [B] :
      ( ~ relation(B)
      | ~ function(B)
      | ( ! [A] :
            ( B != identity_relation(A)
            | ( relation_dom(B) = A
              & ! [C] :
                  ( ~ in(C,A)
                  | apply(B,C) = C ) ) )
        & ! [A] :
            ( B = identity_relation(A)
            | relation_dom(B) != A
            | ( in(sk0_11(A,B),A)
              & apply(B,sk0_11(A,B)) != sk0_11(A,B) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemization,[status(esa)],[f110]) ).

fof(f113,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ function(X0)
      | X0 != identity_relation(X1)
      | ~ in(X2,X1)
      | apply(X0,X2) = X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f111]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(identity_relation(X0))
      | ~ function(identity_relation(X0))
      | ~ in(X1,X0)
      | apply(identity_relation(X0),X1) = X1 ),
    inference(destructive_equality_resolution,[status(esa)],[f113]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    ~ empty(sk0_9),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f103,f106]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    element(sk0_10,sk0_9),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f100,f106]) ).

fof(f123,plain,
    ( spl0_0
  <=> empty(sk0_9) ),
    introduced(split_symbol_definition) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ( empty(sk0_9)
    | ~ spl0_0 ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f123]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> in(sk0_10,sk0_9) ),
    introduced(split_symbol_definition) ).

fof(f129,plain,
    ( empty(sk0_9)
    | in(sk0_10,sk0_9) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f54,f122]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    ( spl0_0
    | spl0_1 ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f129,f123,f126]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_0 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f124,f120]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ~ spl0_0,
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f131]) ).

fof(f133,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(identity_relation(X0))
      | ~ in(X1,X0)
      | apply(identity_relation(X0),X1) = X1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f117,f72]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> function(identity_relation(sk0_9)) ),
    introduced(split_symbol_definition) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ( ~ function(identity_relation(sk0_9))
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(component_clause,[status(thm)],[f134]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ( ~ function(identity_relation(sk0_9))
    | ~ in(sk0_10,sk0_9) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f133,f107]) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_2
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(split_clause,[status(thm)],[f137,f134,f126]) ).

fof(f148,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f136,f75]) ).

fof(f149,plain,
    spl0_2,
    inference(contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f148]) ).

fof(f150,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f130,f132,f138,f149]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SEU217+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : drodi -learnfrom(drodi.lrn) -timeout(%d) %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue May 30 09:10:32 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  % Drodi V3.5.1
% 0.13/0.36  % Refutation found
% 0.13/0.36  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark: Theorem is valid
% 0.13/0.36  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.57  % Elapsed time: 0.015091 seconds
% 0.19/0.57  % CPU time: 0.031227 seconds
% 0.19/0.57  % Memory used: 11.718 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------