TSTP Solution File: SEU217+2 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : SEU217+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 09:29:19 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 5.83s 1.19s
% Output   : Refutation 5.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   97 (  48 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  120 (  48   ~;  40   |;  23   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (  40   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f31458,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f31428,f680]) ).

fof(f680,plain,
    sK23 != apply(identity_relation(sK22),sK23),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f453]) ).

fof(f453,plain,
    ( sK23 != apply(identity_relation(sK22),sK23)
    & in(sK23,sK22) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK22,sK23])],[f237,f452]) ).

fof(f452,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( apply(identity_relation(X0),X1) != X1
        & in(X1,X0) )
   => ( sK23 != apply(identity_relation(sK22),sK23)
      & in(sK23,sK22) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f237,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( apply(identity_relation(X0),X1) != X1
      & in(X1,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f166]) ).

fof(f166,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( in(X1,X0)
       => apply(identity_relation(X0),X1) = X1 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f165]) ).

fof(f165,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(X1,X0)
     => apply(identity_relation(X0),X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t35_funct_1) ).

fof(f31428,plain,
    sK23 = apply(identity_relation(sK22),sK23),
    inference(resolution,[],[f31230,f679]) ).

fof(f679,plain,
    in(sK23,sK22),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f453]) ).

fof(f31230,plain,
    ! [X3,X0] :
      ( ~ in(X3,X0)
      | apply(identity_relation(X0),X3) = X3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f31229,f838]) ).

fof(f838,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f62,axiom,
    ! [X0] : relation(identity_relation(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_relat_1) ).

fof(f31229,plain,
    ! [X3,X0] :
      ( apply(identity_relation(X0),X3) = X3
      | ~ in(X3,X0)
      | ~ relation(identity_relation(X0)) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f1099,f846]) ).

fof(f846,plain,
    ! [X0] : function(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f78,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( function(identity_relation(X0))
      & relation(identity_relation(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_funct_1) ).

fof(f1099,plain,
    ! [X3,X0] :
      ( apply(identity_relation(X0),X3) = X3
      | ~ in(X3,X0)
      | ~ function(identity_relation(X0))
      | ~ relation(identity_relation(X0)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f750]) ).

fof(f750,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( apply(X1,X3) = X3
      | ~ in(X3,X0)
      | identity_relation(X0) != X1
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f469]) ).

fof(f469,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
          | ( sK29(X0,X1) != apply(X1,sK29(X0,X1))
            & in(sK29(X0,X1),X0) )
          | relation_dom(X1) != X0 )
        & ( ( ! [X3] :
                ( apply(X1,X3) = X3
                | ~ in(X3,X0) )
            & relation_dom(X1) = X0 )
          | identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) )
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK29])],[f467,f468]) ).

fof(f468,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( apply(X1,X2) != X2
          & in(X2,X0) )
     => ( sK29(X0,X1) != apply(X1,sK29(X0,X1))
        & in(sK29(X0,X1),X0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f467,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
          | ? [X2] :
              ( apply(X1,X2) != X2
              & in(X2,X0) )
          | relation_dom(X1) != X0 )
        & ( ( ! [X3] :
                ( apply(X1,X3) = X3
                | ~ in(X3,X0) )
            & relation_dom(X1) = X0 )
          | identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) )
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f466]) ).

fof(f466,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
          | ? [X2] :
              ( apply(X1,X2) != X2
              & in(X2,X0) )
          | relation_dom(X1) != X0 )
        & ( ( ! [X2] :
                ( apply(X1,X2) = X2
                | ~ in(X2,X0) )
            & relation_dom(X1) = X0 )
          | identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) )
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f465]) ).

fof(f465,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
          | ? [X2] :
              ( apply(X1,X2) != X2
              & in(X2,X0) )
          | relation_dom(X1) != X0 )
        & ( ( ! [X2] :
                ( apply(X1,X2) = X2
                | ~ in(X2,X0) )
            & relation_dom(X1) = X0 )
          | identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) )
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f293]) ).

fof(f293,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
      <=> ( ! [X2] :
              ( apply(X1,X2) = X2
              | ~ in(X2,X0) )
          & relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) )
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f292]) ).

fof(f292,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
      <=> ( ! [X2] :
              ( apply(X1,X2) = X2
              | ~ in(X2,X0) )
          & relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) )
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f164]) ).

fof(f164,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
      <=> ( ! [X2] :
              ( in(X2,X0)
             => apply(X1,X2) = X2 )
          & relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t34_funct_1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SEU217+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 10:53:34 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.36  % (32078)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.14/0.38  % (32081)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.14/0.38  % (32085)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32079)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32082)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32080)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32081)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32083)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.14/0.39  % (32084)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.43  TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.44  TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.46  TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.47  TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.49  TRYING [3]
% 0.21/0.50  TRYING [3]
% 0.21/0.54  TRYING [1]
% 0.21/0.55  TRYING [2]
% 0.21/0.55  TRYING [4]
% 2.63/0.76  TRYING [4]
% 2.63/0.78  TRYING [3]
% 3.85/0.90  TRYING [5]
% 5.81/1.18  % (32081)First to succeed.
% 5.81/1.18  % (32081)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-32078"
% 5.83/1.19  % (32081)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 5.83/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 5.83/1.19  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 5.83/1.19  % (32081)------------------------------
% 5.83/1.19  % (32081)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 5.83/1.19  % (32081)Termination reason: Refutation
% 5.83/1.19  
% 5.83/1.19  % (32081)Memory used [KB]: 12390
% 5.83/1.19  % (32081)Time elapsed: 0.800 s
% 5.83/1.19  % (32081)Instructions burned: 2553 (million)
% 5.83/1.19  % (32078)Success in time 0.811 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------