TSTP Solution File: SEU217+2 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : SEU217+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 01:58:45 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 2.90s
% Output : Solution 2.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4210/SEU217+2.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4210/SEU217+2.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4210/SEU217+2.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 4306
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.047 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:relation(identity_relation(X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', dt_k6_relat_1)).
% fof(12, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:((relation(X2)&function(X2))=>(X2=identity_relation(X1)<=>(relation_dom(X2)=X1&![X3]:(in(X3,X1)=>apply(X2,X3)=X3)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t34_funct_1)).
% fof(81, axiom,![X1]:(relation(identity_relation(X1))&function(identity_relation(X1))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', fc2_funct_1)).
% fof(222, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:(in(X2,X1)=>apply(identity_relation(X1),X2)=X2),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t35_funct_1)).
% fof(223, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:(in(X2,X1)=>apply(identity_relation(X1),X2)=X2)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[222])).
% fof(277, plain,![X2]:relation(identity_relation(X2)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[5])).
% cnf(278,plain,(relation(identity_relation(X1))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[277])).
% fof(343, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(relation(X2))|~(function(X2)))|((~(X2=identity_relation(X1))|(relation_dom(X2)=X1&![X3]:(~(in(X3,X1))|apply(X2,X3)=X3)))&((~(relation_dom(X2)=X1)|?[X3]:(in(X3,X1)&~(apply(X2,X3)=X3)))|X2=identity_relation(X1)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[12])).
% fof(344, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))|((~(X5=identity_relation(X4))|(relation_dom(X5)=X4&![X6]:(~(in(X6,X4))|apply(X5,X6)=X6)))&((~(relation_dom(X5)=X4)|?[X7]:(in(X7,X4)&~(apply(X5,X7)=X7)))|X5=identity_relation(X4)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[343])).
% fof(345, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))|((~(X5=identity_relation(X4))|(relation_dom(X5)=X4&![X6]:(~(in(X6,X4))|apply(X5,X6)=X6)))&((~(relation_dom(X5)=X4)|(in(esk13_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(apply(X5,esk13_2(X4,X5))=esk13_2(X4,X5))))|X5=identity_relation(X4)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[344])).
% fof(346, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((((~(in(X6,X4))|apply(X5,X6)=X6)&relation_dom(X5)=X4)|~(X5=identity_relation(X4)))&((~(relation_dom(X5)=X4)|(in(esk13_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(apply(X5,esk13_2(X4,X5))=esk13_2(X4,X5))))|X5=identity_relation(X4)))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[345])).
% fof(347, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((((~(in(X6,X4))|apply(X5,X6)=X6)|~(X5=identity_relation(X4)))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5))))&((relation_dom(X5)=X4|~(X5=identity_relation(X4)))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))))&((((in(esk13_2(X4,X5),X4)|~(relation_dom(X5)=X4))|X5=identity_relation(X4))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5))))&(((~(apply(X5,esk13_2(X4,X5))=esk13_2(X4,X5))|~(relation_dom(X5)=X4))|X5=identity_relation(X4))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[346])).
% cnf(351,plain,(apply(X1,X3)=X3|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)|X1!=identity_relation(X2)|~in(X3,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[347])).
% fof(699, plain,![X2]:(relation(identity_relation(X2))&function(identity_relation(X2))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[81])).
% cnf(700,plain,(function(identity_relation(X1))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[699])).
% fof(1158, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:(in(X2,X1)&~(apply(identity_relation(X1),X2)=X2)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[223])).
% fof(1159, negated_conjecture,?[X3]:?[X4]:(in(X4,X3)&~(apply(identity_relation(X3),X4)=X4)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[1158])).
% fof(1160, negated_conjecture,(in(esk74_0,esk73_0)&~(apply(identity_relation(esk73_0),esk74_0)=esk74_0)),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[1159])).
% cnf(1161,negated_conjecture,(apply(identity_relation(esk73_0),esk74_0)!=esk74_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1160])).
% cnf(1162,negated_conjecture,(in(esk74_0,esk73_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[1160])).
% cnf(2207,negated_conjecture,(apply(X1,esk74_0)=esk74_0|identity_relation(esk73_0)!=X1|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[351,1162,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7578,negated_conjecture,(~function(identity_relation(esk73_0))|~relation(identity_relation(esk73_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[1161,2207,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7585,negated_conjecture,($false|~relation(identity_relation(esk73_0))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[7578,700,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7586,negated_conjecture,($false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[7585,278,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7587,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[7586,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(7588,negated_conjecture,($false),7587,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 943
% # ...of these trivial : 16
% # ...subsumed : 142
% # ...remaining for further processing: 785
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 53
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 10
% # Generated clauses : 5467
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 5144
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 16
% # Paramodulations : 5374
% # Factorizations : 14
% # Equation resolutions : 79
% # Current number of processed clauses: 420
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 56
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% # Negative unit clauses : 25
% # Non-unit-clauses : 336
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4734
% # ...number of literals in the above : 21610
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7747
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2852
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 389
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 72
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 61
% # Backwards rewriting index: 426 leaves, 1.64+/-2.967 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 187 leaves, 1.20+/-1.227 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 384 leaves, 1.48+/-2.398 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.314 s
% # System time : 0.012 s
% # Total time : 0.326 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.56 CPU 0.64 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.56 CPU 0.64 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4210/SEU217+2.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------