TSTP Solution File: SEU217+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SEU217+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AhvNL9t5Bh true
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 19:11:18 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.21s 0.77s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 7 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 12 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 86 ( 13 ~; 9 |; 3 &; 56 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 ^; 18 !; 0 ?; 18 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(relation_type,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
thf(relation_dom_type,type,
relation_dom: $i > $i ).
thf(identity_relation_type,type,
identity_relation: $i > $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(apply_type,type,
apply: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk__7_type,type,
sk__7: $i ).
thf(sk__8_type,type,
sk__8: $i ).
thf(function_type,type,
function: $i > $o ).
thf(t34_funct_1,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ B )
& ( function @ B ) )
=> ( ( B
= ( identity_relation @ A ) )
<=> ( ( ( relation_dom @ B )
= A )
& ! [C: $i] :
( ( in @ C @ A )
=> ( ( apply @ B @ C )
= C ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl39,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X1
!= ( identity_relation @ X0 ) )
| ( ( apply @ X1 @ X2 )
= X2 )
| ~ ( in @ X2 @ X0 )
| ~ ( function @ X1 )
| ~ ( relation @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[t34_funct_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl281,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( relation @ ( identity_relation @ X0 ) )
| ~ ( function @ ( identity_relation @ X0 ) )
| ~ ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
| ( ( apply @ ( identity_relation @ X0 ) @ X1 )
= X1 ) ),
inference(eq_res,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl39]) ).
thf(dt_k6_relat_1,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( relation @ ( identity_relation @ A ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl28,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ( relation @ ( identity_relation @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[dt_k6_relat_1]) ).
thf(fc2_funct_1,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( function @ ( identity_relation @ A ) )
& ( relation @ ( identity_relation @ A ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl32,plain,
! [X0: $i] : ( function @ ( identity_relation @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fc2_funct_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl282,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ X1 @ X0 )
| ( ( apply @ ( identity_relation @ X0 ) @ X1 )
= X1 ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl281,zip_derived_cl28,zip_derived_cl32]) ).
thf(t35_funct_1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ B @ A )
=> ( ( apply @ ( identity_relation @ A ) @ B )
= B ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ B @ A )
=> ( ( apply @ ( identity_relation @ A ) @ B )
= B ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[t35_funct_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl36,plain,
( ( apply @ ( identity_relation @ sk__7 ) @ sk__8 )
!= sk__8 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl303,plain,
( ~ ( in @ sk__8 @ sk__7 )
| ( sk__8 != sk__8 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl282,zip_derived_cl36]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl35,plain,
in @ sk__8 @ sk__7,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl306,plain,
sk__8 != sk__8,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl303,zip_derived_cl35]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl307,plain,
$false,
inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl306]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SEU217+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.AhvNL9t5Bh true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 01:59:54 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.67 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.77 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.21/0.77 % BCE start: 41
% 0.21/0.77 % BCE eliminated: 2
% 0.21/0.77 % PE start: 39
% 0.21/0.77 logic: eq
% 0.21/0.77 % PE eliminated: 2
% 0.21/0.77 % done 54 iterations in 0.027s
% 0.21/0.77 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.21/0.77 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.77
% 0.21/0.77
% 0.21/0.77 % Terminating...
% 0.21/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 0.21/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------