TSTP Solution File: SEU217+1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SEU217+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:27:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  102 (  50 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  128 (  53   ~;  41   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (  41   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f129,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f128,f76]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    in(sK3,sK2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ( in(sK3,sK2)
    & sK3 != apply(identity_relation(sK2),sK3) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3])],[f50,f51]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( in(X1,X0)
        & apply(identity_relation(X0),X1) != X1 )
   => ( in(sK3,sK2)
      & sK3 != apply(identity_relation(sK2),sK3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( in(X1,X0)
      & apply(identity_relation(X0),X1) != X1 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ? [X1,X0] :
      ( in(X0,X1)
      & apply(identity_relation(X1),X0) != X0 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ~ ! [X1,X0] :
        ( in(X0,X1)
       => apply(identity_relation(X1),X0) = X0 ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X0] :
        ( in(X1,X0)
       => apply(identity_relation(X0),X1) = X1 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f27,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( in(X1,X0)
     => apply(identity_relation(X0),X1) = X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t35_funct_1) ).

fof(f128,plain,
    ~ in(sK3,sK2),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f127]) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    ( sK3 != sK3
    | ~ in(sK3,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f75,f126]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    ! [X3,X1] :
      ( apply(identity_relation(X1),X3) = X3
      | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f125,f78]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X0] : function(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f24,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( function(identity_relation(X0))
      & relation(identity_relation(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_funct_1) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    ! [X3,X1] :
      ( ~ function(identity_relation(X1))
      | apply(identity_relation(X1),X3) = X3
      | ~ in(X3,X1) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f97,f77]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation(identity_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ! [X3,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X3,X1)
      | ~ relation(identity_relation(X1))
      | apply(identity_relation(X1),X3) = X3
      | ~ function(identity_relation(X1)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f82]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ in(X3,X1)
      | apply(X0,X3) = X3
      | identity_relation(X1) != X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( ( identity_relation(X1) = X0
          | relation_dom(X0) != X1
          | ( in(sK4(X0,X1),X1)
            & apply(X0,sK4(X0,X1)) != sK4(X0,X1) ) )
        & ( ( relation_dom(X0) = X1
            & ! [X3] :
                ( ~ in(X3,X1)
                | apply(X0,X3) = X3 ) )
          | identity_relation(X1) != X0 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4])],[f55,f56]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
          & apply(X0,X2) != X2 )
     => ( in(sK4(X0,X1),X1)
        & apply(X0,sK4(X0,X1)) != sK4(X0,X1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ function(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( ( identity_relation(X1) = X0
          | relation_dom(X0) != X1
          | ? [X2] :
              ( in(X2,X1)
              & apply(X0,X2) != X2 ) )
        & ( ( relation_dom(X0) = X1
            & ! [X3] :
                ( ~ in(X3,X1)
                | apply(X0,X3) = X3 ) )
          | identity_relation(X1) != X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
          | relation_dom(X1) != X0
          | ? [X2] :
              ( in(X2,X0)
              & apply(X1,X2) != X2 ) )
        & ( ( relation_dom(X1) = X0
            & ! [X2] :
                ( ~ in(X2,X0)
                | apply(X1,X2) = X2 ) )
          | identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
          | relation_dom(X1) != X0
          | ? [X2] :
              ( in(X2,X0)
              & apply(X1,X2) != X2 ) )
        & ( ( relation_dom(X1) = X0
            & ! [X2] :
                ( ~ in(X2,X0)
                | apply(X1,X2) = X2 ) )
          | identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
      <=> ( relation_dom(X1) = X0
          & ! [X2] :
              ( ~ in(X2,X0)
              | apply(X1,X2) = X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
      <=> ( relation_dom(X1) = X0
          & ! [X2] :
              ( ~ in(X2,X0)
              | apply(X1,X2) = X2 ) ) )
      | ~ function(X1)
      | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( function(X1)
        & relation(X1) )
     => ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
      <=> ( ! [X2] :
              ( in(X2,X0)
             => apply(X1,X2) = X2 )
          & relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t34_funct_1) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    sK3 != apply(identity_relation(sK2),sK3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : SEU217+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 15:02:21 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  % (18127)dis+1002_1:1_aac=none:bd=off:sac=on:sos=on:spb=units:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (18131)dis+1010_1:50_awrs=decay:awrsf=128:nwc=10.0:s2pl=no:sp=frequency:ss=axioms:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 0.21/0.50  % (18133)dis+10_1:1_newcnf=on:sgt=8:sos=on:ss=axioms:to=lpo:urr=on:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.21/0.51  % (18144)ott+1010_1:1_sd=2:sos=on:sp=occurrence:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.21/0.51  % (18130)dis+21_1:1_av=off:sos=on:sp=frequency:ss=included:to=lpo:i=15:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/15Mi)
% 0.21/0.51  % (18153)dis+21_1:1_aac=none:abs=on:er=known:fde=none:fsr=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=4.0:sp=const_frequency:to=lpo:urr=ec_only:i=25:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/25Mi)
% 0.21/0.51  % (18148)dis+1010_2:3_fs=off:fsr=off:nm=0:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2agt=32:i=82:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/82Mi)
% 0.21/0.51  % (18125)dis+1002_1:12_drc=off:fd=preordered:tgt=full:i=99978:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99978Mi)
% 0.21/0.51  % (18126)lrs+10_1:1_gsp=on:sd=1:sgt=32:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=13:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/13Mi)
% 0.21/0.51  % (18155)lrs-11_1:1_nm=0:sac=on:sd=4:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=24:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.21/0.51  % (18131)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.52  % (18131)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52  % (18131)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  % (18131)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.52  % (18131)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.52  % (18131)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  % (18131)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.21/0.52  % (18131)Time elapsed: 0.108 s
% 0.21/0.52  % (18131)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.21/0.52  % (18131)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  % (18131)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52  % (18122)Success in time 0.166 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------