TSTP Solution File: SEU216+3 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU216+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:35:06 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.27s 7.44s
% Output   : Refutation 7.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU216+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 17:44:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 7.27/7.44  
% 7.27/7.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 7.27/7.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 7.27/7.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 7.27/7.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 7.27/7.44  SPASS derived 10752 clauses, backtracked 266 clauses, performed 5 splits and kept 5429 clauses.
% 7.27/7.44  SPASS allocated 110100 KBytes.
% 7.27/7.44  SPASS spent	0:00:06.90 on the problem.
% 7.27/7.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 7.27/7.44  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 7.27/7.44  		0:00:00.16 for inferences.
% 7.27/7.44  		0:00:00.20 for the backtracking.
% 7.27/7.44  		0:00:06.38 for the reduction.
% 7.27/7.44  
% 7.27/7.44  
% 7.27/7.44  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 73 :
% 7.27/7.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.27/7.44  1[0:Inp] ||  -> function(skc9)*.
% 7.27/7.44  2[0:Inp] ||  -> relation(skc9)*.
% 7.27/7.44  18[0:Inp] ||  -> relation(identity_relation(u))*.
% 7.27/7.44  19[0:Inp] ||  -> function(identity_relation(u))*.
% 7.27/7.44  33[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(relation_dom(identity_relation(u)),u)**.
% 7.27/7.44  44[0:Inp] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) equal(relation_dom(skc9),skc10)**.
% 7.27/7.44  55[0:Inp] || in(u,skc10) -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) equal(apply(skc9,u),u)**.
% 7.27/7.44  56[0:Inp] || equal(relation_dom(skc9),skc10) equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  57[0:Inp] || equal(relation_dom(skc9),skc10) equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) equal(apply(skc9,skc11),skc11)** -> .
% 7.27/7.44  58[0:Inp] function(u) relation(u) || in(ordered_pair(v,w),u)* -> in(v,relation_dom(u)).
% 7.27/7.44  61[0:Inp] function(u) relation(u) || in(ordered_pair(v,w),u)* -> equal(w,apply(u,v)).
% 7.27/7.44  64[0:Inp] relation(u) ||  -> equal(u,identity_relation(v)) in(skf5(v,u),v) in(ordered_pair(skf5(v,u),skf6(v,u)),u)*.
% 7.27/7.44  65[0:Inp] relation(u) || equal(v,w) in(v,x)* equal(u,identity_relation(x))*+ -> in(ordered_pair(v,w),u)*.
% 7.27/7.44  66[0:Inp] function(u) relation(u) || in(v,relation_dom(u)) equal(w,apply(u,v)) -> in(ordered_pair(v,w),u)*.
% 7.27/7.44  69[0:Inp] relation(u) ||  -> equal(u,identity_relation(v)) equal(skf6(v,u),skf5(v,u)) in(ordered_pair(skf5(v,u),skf6(v,u)),u)*.
% 7.27/7.44  70[0:Inp] || in(skf5(u,v),u) equal(skf6(u,v),skf5(u,v)) in(ordered_pair(skf5(u,v),skf6(u,v)),v)* -> .
% 7.27/7.44  73[0:Res:2.0,66.0] function(skc9) || equal(u,apply(skc9,v)) in(v,relation_dom(skc9)) -> in(ordered_pair(v,u),skc9)*.
% 7.27/7.44  81[0:Res:2.0,58.0] function(skc9) || in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc9)* -> in(u,relation_dom(skc9)).
% 7.27/7.44  89[0:MRR:81.0,1.0] || in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc9)* -> in(u,relation_dom(skc9)).
% 7.27/7.44  93[0:MRR:73.0,1.0] || in(u,relation_dom(skc9)) equal(v,apply(skc9,u)) -> in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc9)*.
% 7.27/7.44  94[1:Spt:44.1] ||  -> equal(relation_dom(skc9),skc10)**.
% 7.27/7.44  95[1:Rew:94.0,57.0] || equal(skc10,skc10) equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) equal(apply(skc9,skc11),skc11)** -> .
% 7.27/7.44  96[1:Rew:94.0,56.0] || equal(skc10,skc10) equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  100[1:Rew:94.0,93.0] || in(u,skc10) equal(v,apply(skc9,u)) -> in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc9)*.
% 7.27/7.44  101[1:Rew:94.0,89.1] || in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc9)* -> in(u,skc10).
% 7.27/7.44  102[1:Obv:96.0] || equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  103[1:Obv:95.0] || equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) equal(apply(skc9,skc11),skc11)** -> .
% 7.27/7.44  105[2:Spt:55.0,55.2] || in(u,skc10) -> equal(apply(skc9,u),u)**.
% 7.27/7.44  106[2:Rew:105.1,100.1] || in(u,skc10) equal(v,u) -> in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc9)*.
% 7.27/7.44  207[3:Spt:103.0] || equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9)** -> .
% 7.27/7.44  340[0:EqR:65.3] relation(identity_relation(u)) || equal(v,w) in(v,u) -> in(ordered_pair(v,w),identity_relation(u))*.
% 7.27/7.44  342[0:SSi:340.0,19.0,18.0] || equal(u,v) in(u,w) -> in(ordered_pair(u,v),identity_relation(w))*.
% 7.27/7.44  365[1:Res:64.3,101.0] relation(skc9) ||  -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) in(skf5(u,skc9),u)* in(skf5(u,skc9),skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  368[1:SSi:365.0,1.0,2.0] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) in(skf5(u,skc9),u)* in(skf5(u,skc9),skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  439[0:Res:69.3,61.2] relation(u) function(u) relation(u) ||  -> equal(u,identity_relation(v)) equal(skf6(v,u),skf5(v,u)) equal(apply(u,skf5(v,u)),skf6(v,u))**.
% 7.27/7.44  443[1:Res:69.3,101.0] relation(skc9) ||  -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) equal(skf6(u,skc9),skf5(u,skc9)) in(skf5(u,skc9),skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  446[1:SSi:443.0,1.0,2.0] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) equal(skf6(u,skc9),skf5(u,skc9)) in(skf5(u,skc9),skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  450[0:Obv:439.0] function(u) relation(u) ||  -> equal(u,identity_relation(v)) equal(skf6(v,u),skf5(v,u)) equal(apply(u,skf5(v,u)),skf6(v,u))**.
% 7.27/7.44  701[2:Res:106.2,70.2] || in(skf5(u,skc9),skc10)* equal(skf6(u,skc9),skf5(u,skc9)) in(skf5(u,skc9),u)* equal(skf6(u,skc9),skf5(u,skc9)) -> .
% 7.27/7.44  711[2:Obv:701.1] || in(skf5(u,skc9),skc10)* in(skf5(u,skc9),u)* equal(skf6(u,skc9),skf5(u,skc9))+ -> .
% 7.27/7.44  849[0:Res:342.2,61.2] function(identity_relation(u)) relation(identity_relation(u)) || equal(v,w) in(v,u) -> equal(w,apply(identity_relation(u),v))*.
% 7.27/7.44  860[0:SSi:849.1,849.0,19.0,18.0,19.0,18.0] || equal(u,v) in(u,w) -> equal(v,apply(identity_relation(w),u))*.
% 7.27/7.44  1597[2:SpR:450.4,105.1] function(skc9) relation(skc9) || in(skf5(u,skc9),skc10)* -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) equal(skf6(u,skc9),skf5(u,skc9)) equal(skf6(u,skc9),skf5(u,skc9)).
% 7.27/7.44  1605[2:Obv:1597.4] function(skc9) relation(skc9) || in(skf5(u,skc9),skc10)* -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) equal(skf6(u,skc9),skf5(u,skc9)).
% 7.27/7.44  1606[2:SSi:1605.1,1605.0,1.0,2.0,1.0,2.0] || in(skf5(u,skc9),skc10)* -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) equal(skf6(u,skc9),skf5(u,skc9)).
% 7.27/7.44  1607[2:MRR:1606.0,446.2] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9) equal(skf6(u,skc9),skf5(u,skc9))**.
% 7.27/7.44  1822[1:Fac:368.1,368.2] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9) in(skf5(skc10,skc9),skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  1846[3:MRR:1822.0,207.0] ||  -> in(skf5(skc10,skc9),skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  4009[2:SpL:1607.1,711.2] || in(skf5(u,skc9),skc10)* in(skf5(u,skc9),u)* equal(skf5(u,skc9),skf5(u,skc9)) -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9).
% 7.27/7.44  4014[2:Obv:4009.2] || in(skf5(u,skc9),skc10)*+ in(skf5(u,skc9),u)* -> equal(identity_relation(u),skc9).
% 7.27/7.44  10575[3:Res:1846.0,4014.0] || in(skf5(skc10,skc9),skc10)* -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9).
% 7.27/7.44  10577[3:MRR:10575.0,10575.1,1846.0,207.0] ||  -> .
% 7.27/7.44  10585[3:Spt:10577.0,103.0,207.0] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9)**.
% 7.27/7.44  10586[3:Spt:10577.0,103.1] || equal(apply(skc9,skc11),skc11)** -> .
% 7.27/7.44  10589[3:Rew:10585.0,102.0] || equal(skc9,skc9) -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  10590[3:Obv:10589.0] ||  -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  10690[3:SpL:105.1,10586.0] || in(skc11,skc10)* equal(skc11,skc11) -> .
% 7.27/7.44  10695[3:Obv:10690.1] || in(skc11,skc10)* -> .
% 7.27/7.44  10696[3:MRR:10695.0,10590.0] ||  -> .
% 7.27/7.44  10698[2:Spt:10696.0,55.1] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9)**.
% 7.27/7.44  10701[2:Rew:10698.0,102.0] || equal(skc9,skc9) -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  10702[2:Obv:10701.0] ||  -> in(skc11,skc10)*.
% 7.27/7.44  10706[2:Rew:10698.0,103.0] || equal(skc9,skc9) equal(apply(skc9,skc11),skc11)** -> .
% 7.27/7.44  10707[2:Obv:10706.0] || equal(apply(skc9,skc11),skc11)** -> .
% 7.27/7.44  10748[2:SpR:10698.0,860.2] || equal(u,v) in(u,skc10) -> equal(v,apply(skc9,u))*.
% 7.27/7.44  13099[2:SpL:10748.2,10707.0] || equal(skc11,u)* in(skc11,skc10)* equal(u,skc11)* -> .
% 7.27/7.44  13103[2:Obv:13099.0] || in(skc11,skc10)* equal(u,skc11)* -> .
% 7.27/7.44  13104[2:AED:13103.1] || in(skc11,skc10)* -> .
% 7.27/7.44  13105[2:MRR:13104.0,10702.0] ||  -> .
% 7.27/7.44  13195[1:Spt:13105.0,44.1,94.0] || equal(relation_dom(skc9),skc10)** -> .
% 7.27/7.44  13196[1:Spt:13105.0,44.0] ||  -> equal(identity_relation(skc10),skc9)**.
% 7.27/7.44  13200[1:SpR:13196.0,33.0] ||  -> equal(relation_dom(skc9),skc10)**.
% 7.27/7.44  13273[1:MRR:13200.0,13195.0] ||  -> .
% 7.27/7.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 7.27/7.44  Formulae used in the proof : t34_funct_1 fc2_funct_1 t71_relat_1 t8_funct_1 d10_relat_1 antisymmetry_r2_hidden
% 7.27/7.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------