TSTP Solution File: SEU215+1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SEU215+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:17:16 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 3.79s 1.10s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
=> ( apply(X0,X1) = X2
<=> empty_set = X2 ) )
& ( in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
=> ( apply(X0,X1) = X2
<=> in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_funct_1) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& relation(X0) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(f18,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1)
& function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ( function(relation_composition(X0,X1))
& relation(relation_composition(X0,X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_funct_1) ).
fof(f34,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_funct_1) ).
fof(f35,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
=> apply(relation_composition(X2,X1),X0) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X0)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t22_funct_1) ).
fof(f36,conjecture,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
=> apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X0)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1) ).
fof(f37,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
=> apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X0)) ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f36]) ).
fof(f47,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1,X2] :
( ( ( apply(X0,X1) = X2
<=> empty_set = X2 )
| in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) )
& ( ( apply(X0,X1) = X2
<=> in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) )
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f48,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1,X2] :
( ( ( apply(X0,X1) = X2
<=> empty_set = X2 )
| in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) )
& ( ( apply(X0,X1) = X2
<=> in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) )
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f47]) ).
fof(f49,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( relation(relation_composition(X0,X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f50,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( relation(relation_composition(X0,X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f49]) ).
fof(f53,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(relation_composition(X0,X1))
& relation(relation_composition(X0,X1)) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).
fof(f54,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(relation_composition(X0,X1))
& relation(relation_composition(X0,X1)) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f53]) ).
fof(f61,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f62,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
<=> ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) ) )
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f61]) ).
fof(f63,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( apply(relation_composition(X2,X1),X0) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X0))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).
fof(f64,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( apply(relation_composition(X2,X1),X0) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X0))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f63]) ).
fof(f65,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) != apply(X2,apply(X1,X0))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
& function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
& function(X1)
& relation(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) != apply(X2,apply(X1,X0))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
& function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
& function(X1)
& relation(X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f65]) ).
fof(f72,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1,X2] :
( ( ( ( apply(X0,X1) = X2
| empty_set != X2 )
& ( empty_set = X2
| apply(X0,X1) != X2 ) )
| in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) )
& ( ( ( apply(X0,X1) = X2
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0)
| apply(X0,X1) != X2 ) )
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).
fof(f87,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( ( ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| ~ in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) )
& ( ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) )
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))) ) )
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).
fof(f88,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( ( ( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| ~ in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) )
& ( ( in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X2)) )
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))) ) )
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f87]) ).
fof(f89,plain,
( ? [X0,X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) != apply(X2,apply(X1,X0))
& in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
& function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
& function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( ? [X2] :
( apply(relation_composition(sK8,X2),sK7) != apply(X2,apply(sK8,sK7))
& in(sK7,relation_dom(sK8))
& function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
& function(sK8)
& relation(sK8) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f90,plain,
( ? [X2] :
( apply(relation_composition(sK8,X2),sK7) != apply(X2,apply(sK8,sK7))
& in(sK7,relation_dom(sK8))
& function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7) != apply(sK9,apply(sK8,sK7))
& in(sK7,relation_dom(sK8))
& function(sK9)
& relation(sK9) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f91,plain,
( apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7) != apply(sK9,apply(sK8,sK7))
& in(sK7,relation_dom(sK8))
& function(sK9)
& relation(sK9)
& function(sK8)
& relation(sK8) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK7,sK8,sK9])],[f66,f90,f89]) ).
fof(f98,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( empty_set = X2
| apply(X0,X1) != X2
| in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f72]) ).
fof(f101,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( relation(relation_composition(X0,X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).
fof(f108,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( function(relation_composition(X0,X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f132,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| ~ in(apply(X2,X0),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X2))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).
fof(f133,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( apply(relation_composition(X2,X1),X0) = apply(X1,apply(X2,X0))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).
fof(f134,plain,
relation(sK8),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f135,plain,
function(sK8),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f136,plain,
relation(sK9),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f137,plain,
function(sK9),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f138,plain,
in(sK7,relation_dom(sK8)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f139,plain,
apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7) != apply(sK9,apply(sK8,sK7)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f148,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( apply(X0,X1) = empty_set
| in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f98]) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| apply(X0,X1) = empty_set
| in(X1,relation_dom(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f148]) ).
cnf(c_57,plain,
( ~ relation(X0)
| ~ relation(X1)
| relation(relation_composition(X1,X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f101]) ).
cnf(c_63,plain,
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ relation(X1)
| function(relation_composition(X1,X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f108]) ).
cnf(c_86,plain,
( ~ in(apply(X0,X1),relation_dom(X2))
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ relation(X2)
| in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X0,X2))) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f132]) ).
cnf(c_89,plain,
( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f133]) ).
cnf(c_90,negated_conjecture,
apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),sK7) != apply(sK9,apply(sK8,sK7)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f139]) ).
cnf(c_91,negated_conjecture,
in(sK7,relation_dom(sK8)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f138]) ).
cnf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
function(sK9),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).
cnf(c_93,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK9),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f136]) ).
cnf(c_94,negated_conjecture,
function(sK8),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f135]) ).
cnf(c_95,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK8),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).
cnf(c_904,plain,
relation_dom(sK8) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_905,plain,
relation_composition(sK8,sK9) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_906,plain,
apply(sP1_iProver_def,sK7) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_907,plain,
apply(sK8,sK7) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_908,plain,
apply(sK9,sP3_iProver_def) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_909,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK8),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_95]) ).
cnf(c_910,negated_conjecture,
function(sK8),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_94]) ).
cnf(c_911,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK9),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_93]) ).
cnf(c_912,negated_conjecture,
function(sK9),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_92]) ).
cnf(c_913,negated_conjecture,
in(sK7,sP0_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_904]) ).
cnf(c_914,negated_conjecture,
sP2_iProver_def != sP4_iProver_def,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_907,c_908,c_905,c_906]) ).
cnf(c_1599,plain,
( ~ relation(sK8)
| ~ relation(sK9)
| relation(sP1_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_905,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_1600,plain,
relation(sP1_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1599,c_911,c_909]) ).
cnf(c_1985,plain,
( ~ function(sK8)
| ~ function(sK9)
| ~ relation(sK8)
| ~ relation(sK9)
| function(sP1_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_905,c_63]) ).
cnf(c_1989,plain,
function(sP1_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1985,c_911,c_909,c_912,c_910]) ).
cnf(c_2318,plain,
( ~ in(sP3_iProver_def,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ in(sK7,relation_dom(sK8))
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(sK8)
| ~ relation(sK8)
| in(sK7,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK8,X0))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_907,c_86]) ).
cnf(c_2335,plain,
( ~ in(sP3_iProver_def,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ in(sK7,sP0_iProver_def)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(sK8)
| ~ relation(sK8)
| in(sK7,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK8,X0))) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2318,c_904]) ).
cnf(c_2336,plain,
( ~ in(sP3_iProver_def,relation_dom(X0))
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| in(sK7,relation_dom(relation_composition(sK8,X0))) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2335,c_909,c_910,c_913]) ).
cnf(c_2382,plain,
( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(sP1_iProver_def))
| ~ function(sK8)
| ~ function(sK9)
| ~ relation(sK8)
| ~ relation(sK9)
| apply(relation_composition(sK8,sK9),X0) = apply(sK9,apply(sK8,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_905,c_89]) ).
cnf(c_2404,plain,
( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(sP1_iProver_def))
| ~ function(sK8)
| ~ function(sK9)
| ~ relation(sK8)
| ~ relation(sK9)
| apply(sK9,apply(sK8,X0)) = apply(sP1_iProver_def,X0) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2382,c_905]) ).
cnf(c_2405,plain,
( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(sP1_iProver_def))
| apply(sK9,apply(sK8,X0)) = apply(sP1_iProver_def,X0) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2404,c_911,c_909,c_912,c_910]) ).
cnf(c_2456,plain,
( ~ function(sP1_iProver_def)
| ~ relation(sP1_iProver_def)
| apply(sK9,apply(sK8,X0)) = apply(sP1_iProver_def,X0)
| apply(sP1_iProver_def,X0) = empty_set ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_2405]) ).
cnf(c_2461,plain,
( apply(sK9,apply(sK8,X0)) = apply(sP1_iProver_def,X0)
| apply(sP1_iProver_def,X0) = empty_set ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2456,c_1600,c_1989]) ).
cnf(c_2478,plain,
( ~ in(sP3_iProver_def,relation_dom(sK9))
| ~ function(sK9)
| ~ relation(sK9)
| in(sK7,relation_dom(sP1_iProver_def)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_905,c_2336]) ).
cnf(c_2486,plain,
( ~ in(sP3_iProver_def,relation_dom(sK9))
| in(sK7,relation_dom(sP1_iProver_def)) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2478,c_911,c_912]) ).
cnf(c_2523,plain,
( ~ function(sK9)
| ~ relation(sK9)
| apply(sK9,sP3_iProver_def) = empty_set
| in(sK7,relation_dom(sP1_iProver_def)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_2486]) ).
cnf(c_2524,plain,
( ~ function(sK9)
| ~ relation(sK9)
| empty_set = sP4_iProver_def
| in(sK7,relation_dom(sP1_iProver_def)) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2523,c_908]) ).
cnf(c_2525,plain,
( empty_set = sP4_iProver_def
| in(sK7,relation_dom(sP1_iProver_def)) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2524,c_911,c_912]) ).
cnf(c_2534,plain,
( apply(sK9,apply(sK8,sK7)) = apply(sP1_iProver_def,sK7)
| empty_set = sP4_iProver_def ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2525,c_2405]) ).
cnf(c_2540,plain,
( empty_set = sP4_iProver_def
| sP2_iProver_def = sP4_iProver_def ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2534,c_906,c_907,c_908]) ).
cnf(c_2541,plain,
empty_set = sP4_iProver_def,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2540,c_914]) ).
cnf(c_2658,plain,
( apply(sK9,apply(sK8,X0)) = apply(sP1_iProver_def,X0)
| apply(sP1_iProver_def,X0) = sP4_iProver_def ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2461,c_2541]) ).
cnf(c_2665,plain,
( apply(sK9,sP3_iProver_def) = apply(sP1_iProver_def,sK7)
| apply(sP1_iProver_def,sK7) = sP4_iProver_def ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_907,c_2658]) ).
cnf(c_2668,plain,
sP2_iProver_def = sP4_iProver_def,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_2665,c_906,c_908]) ).
cnf(c_2669,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2668,c_914]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SEU215+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Fri Jun 21 17:05:24 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.79/1.10 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.10 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 ------ iProver source info
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 3.79/1.10 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 3.79/1.10 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 ------ Parsing...
% 3.79/1.10 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.79/1.10 ------ Proving...
% 3.79/1.10 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 clauses 48
% 3.79/1.10 conjectures 6
% 3.79/1.10 EPR 23
% 3.79/1.10 Horn 46
% 3.79/1.10 unary 25
% 3.79/1.10 binary 8
% 3.79/1.10 lits 105
% 3.79/1.10 lits eq 12
% 3.79/1.10 fd_pure 0
% 3.79/1.10 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.79/1.10 fd_cond 1
% 3.79/1.10 fd_pseudo_cond 2
% 3.79/1.10 AC symbols 0
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 ------
% 3.79/1.10 Current options:
% 3.79/1.10 ------
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 ------ Proving...
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.79/1.10
% 3.79/1.10
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------