TSTP Solution File: SEU215+1 by Leo-III---1.7.7
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.7.7
% Problem : SEU215+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:57:36 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.81s 1.97s
% Output : Refutation 4.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 46
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 81 ( 19 unt; 13 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 194 ( 22 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 518 ( 26 ~; 2 |; 66 &; 366 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 55 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 18 ( 18 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 15 ( 13 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 107 ( 0 ^; 93 !; 14 ?; 107 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(relation_type,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
thf(function_type,type,
function: $i > $o ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(relation_dom_type,type,
relation_dom: $i > $i ).
thf(apply_type,type,
apply: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(relation_composition_type,type,
relation_composition: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(unordered_pair_type,type,
unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(empty_type,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(singleton_type,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
thf(empty_set_type,type,
empty_set: $i ).
thf(ordered_pair_type,type,
ordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(element_type,type,
element: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(relation_empty_yielding_type,type,
relation_empty_yielding: $i > $o ).
thf(20,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ B )
& ( function @ B ) )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ C )
& ( function @ C ) )
=> ( ( in @ A @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_composition @ C @ B ) ) )
<=> ( ( in @ A @ ( relation_dom @ C ) )
& ( in @ ( apply @ C @ A ) @ ( relation_dom @ B ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_funct_1) ).
thf(88,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ B )
& ( function @ B ) )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ C )
& ( function @ C ) )
=> ( ( ( in @ A @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_composition @ C @ B ) ) )
=> ( ( in @ A @ ( relation_dom @ C ) )
& ( in @ ( apply @ C @ A ) @ ( relation_dom @ B ) ) ) )
& ( ( ( in @ A @ ( relation_dom @ C ) )
& ( in @ ( apply @ C @ A ) @ ( relation_dom @ B ) ) )
=> ( in @ A @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_composition @ C @ B ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
thf(27,axiom,
( ( empty @ empty_set )
& ( relation @ empty_set ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc4_relat_1) ).
thf(120,plain,
( ( empty @ empty_set )
& ( relation @ empty_set ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(52,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(23,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ~ ( empty @ A )
& ( relation @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_relat_1) ).
thf(109,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ~ ( empty @ A )
& ( relation @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
thf(30,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(129,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ~ ( in @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[30]) ).
thf(19,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( function @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_funct_1) ).
thf(86,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( function @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(17,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( element @ A @ B )
=> ( ( empty @ B )
| ( in @ A @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_subset) ).
thf(81,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( element @ A @ B )
=> ( ( empty @ B )
| ( in @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ B )
& ( function @ B ) )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ C )
& ( function @ C ) )
=> ( ( in @ A @ ( relation_dom @ B ) )
=> ( ( apply @ ( relation_composition @ B @ C ) @ A )
= ( apply @ C @ ( apply @ B @ A ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ B )
& ( function @ B ) )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ C )
& ( function @ C ) )
=> ( ( in @ A @ ( relation_dom @ B ) )
=> ( ( apply @ ( relation_composition @ B @ C ) @ A )
= ( apply @ C @ ( apply @ B @ A ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(35,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ B )
& ( function @ B ) )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ C )
& ( function @ C ) )
=> ( ( in @ A @ ( relation_dom @ B ) )
=> ( ( apply @ ( relation_composition @ B @ C ) @ A )
= ( apply @ C @ ( apply @ B @ A ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(22,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A ) )
=> ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( in @ B @ ( relation_dom @ A ) )
=> ( ( C
= ( apply @ A @ B ) )
<=> ( in @ ( ordered_pair @ B @ C ) @ A ) ) )
& ( ~ ( in @ B @ ( relation_dom @ A ) )
=> ( ( C
= ( apply @ A @ B ) )
<=> ( C = empty_set ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_funct_1) ).
thf(95,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A ) )
=> ! [B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( in @ B @ ( relation_dom @ A ) )
=> ( ( ( C
= ( apply @ A @ B ) )
=> ( in @ ( ordered_pair @ B @ C ) @ A ) )
& ( ( in @ ( ordered_pair @ B @ C ) @ A )
=> ( C
= ( apply @ A @ B ) ) ) ) )
& ( ~ ( in @ B @ ( relation_dom @ A ) )
=> ( ( ( C
= ( apply @ A @ B ) )
=> ( C = empty_set ) )
& ( ( C = empty_set )
=> ( C
= ( apply @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(50,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( empty @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( unordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ B @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).
thf(43,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( unordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ B @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(29,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( in @ A @ B )
& ( empty @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).
thf(126,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( in @ A @ B )
& ( empty @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[29]) ).
thf(18,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A )
& ( relation @ B )
& ( function @ B ) )
=> ( ( relation @ ( relation_composition @ A @ B ) )
& ( function @ ( relation_composition @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_funct_1) ).
thf(83,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A )
& ( relation @ B )
& ( function @ B ) )
=> ( ( relation @ ( relation_composition @ A @ B ) )
& ( function @ ( relation_composition @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( empty @ A )
& ( A != B )
& ( empty @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_boole) ).
thf(46,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( empty @ A )
& ( A != B )
& ( empty @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(16,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( empty @ A )
& ( relation @ B ) )
=> ( ( empty @ ( relation_composition @ B @ A ) )
& ( relation @ ( relation_composition @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc10_relat_1) ).
thf(78,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( empty @ A )
& ( relation @ B ) )
=> ( ( empty @ ( relation_composition @ B @ A ) )
& ( relation @ ( relation_composition @ B @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( empty @ ( ordered_pair @ A @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(70,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( empty @ ( ordered_pair @ A @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(33,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ~ ( empty @ A )
& ( relation @ A ) )
=> ~ ( empty @ ( relation_dom @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc5_relat_1) ).
thf(137,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ~ ( empty @ A )
& ( relation @ A ) )
=> ~ ( empty @ ( relation_dom @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[33]) ).
thf(21,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( empty @ A )
& ( relation @ B ) )
=> ( ( empty @ ( relation_composition @ A @ B ) )
& ( relation @ ( relation_composition @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc9_relat_1) ).
thf(92,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( empty @ A )
& ( relation @ B ) )
=> ( ( empty @ ( relation_composition @ A @ B ) )
& ( relation @ ( relation_composition @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).
thf(65,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(32,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( ( empty @ ( relation_dom @ A ) )
& ( relation @ ( relation_dom @ A ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc7_relat_1) ).
thf(134,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( ( empty @ ( relation_dom @ A ) )
& ( relation @ ( relation_dom @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[32]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ( element @ A @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_subset) ).
thf(73,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( in @ A @ B )
=> ( element @ A @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ ( singleton @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).
thf(59,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ordered_pair @ A @ B )
= ( unordered_pair @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) @ ( singleton @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(26,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ A )
& ( relation @ B ) )
=> ( relation @ ( relation_composition @ A @ B ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
thf(118,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ A )
& ( relation @ B ) )
=> ( relation @ ( relation_composition @ A @ B ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
thf(24,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( relation @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_relat_1) ).
thf(112,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
=> ( relation @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
thf(28,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
& ( relation_empty_yielding @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc3_relat_1) ).
thf(123,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
& ( relation_empty_yielding @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
thf(34,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_funct_1) ).
thf(139,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( relation @ A )
& ( function @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[34]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ ( singleton @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_subset_1) ).
thf(55,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( empty @ ( singleton @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(25,axiom,
( ( empty @ empty_set )
& ( relation @ empty_set )
& ( relation_empty_yielding @ empty_set ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc12_relat_1) ).
thf(114,plain,
( ( empty @ empty_set )
& ( relation @ empty_set )
& ( relation_empty_yielding @ empty_set ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
& ( relation @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_relat_1) ).
thf(75,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( empty @ A )
& ( relation @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
empty @ empty_set,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(58,plain,
empty @ empty_set,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(31,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ B )
& ( function @ B ) )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ C )
& ( function @ C ) )
=> ( ( in @ A @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_composition @ C @ B ) ) )
=> ( ( apply @ ( relation_composition @ C @ B ) @ A )
= ( apply @ B @ ( apply @ C @ A ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t22_funct_1) ).
thf(131,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ B )
& ( function @ B ) )
=> ! [C: $i] :
( ( ( relation @ C )
& ( function @ C ) )
=> ( ( in @ A @ ( relation_dom @ ( relation_composition @ C @ B ) ) )
=> ( ( apply @ ( relation_composition @ C @ B ) @ A )
= ( apply @ B @ ( apply @ C @ A ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[31]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( element @ B @ A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_subset_1) ).
thf(68,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( element @ B @ A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( empty @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc3_subset_1) ).
thf(62,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( empty @ ( unordered_pair @ A @ B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(142,plain,
$false,
inference(cvc4,[status(thm)],[88,120,52,109,129,86,81,35,95,50,43,126,83,46,78,70,137,92,65,134,73,59,118,112,123,139,55,114,75,58,131,68,62]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SEU215+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.14 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 18 13:30:37 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.97/0.88 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.34/1.02 % [INFO] Parsing done (145ms).
% 1.34/1.03 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.78/1.23 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.78/1.23 % [INFO] cvc4 registered as external prover.
% 1.78/1.23 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.78/1.30 % [INFO] Found a conjecture and 39 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.05/1.34 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 32 axioms (removed 7 axioms).
% 2.05/1.38 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.05/1.38 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.05/1.38 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.81/1.97 % External prover 'cvc4' found a proof!
% 3.81/1.97 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.81/1.97 % Time passed: 1455ms (effective reasoning time: 932ms)
% 3.81/1.97 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.81/1.97 % Axioms used in derivation (32): t22_funct_1, fc9_relat_1, fc1_funct_1, cc1_relat_1, rc1_funct_1, fc3_subset_1, fc2_subset_1, fc10_relat_1, fc5_relat_1, rc2_relat_1, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, fc1_zfmisc_1, d4_funct_1, fc1_xboole_0, d5_tarski, fc4_relat_1, t1_subset, rc3_relat_1, t6_boole, t7_boole, cc1_funct_1, existence_m1_subset_1, commutativity_k2_tarski, rc1_relat_1, dt_k5_relat_1, t21_funct_1, t8_boole, rc1_xboole_0, t2_subset, fc7_relat_1, fc12_relat_1
% 3.81/1.97 % No. of inferences in proof: 68
% 3.81/1.97 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1455 ms resp. 932 ms w/o parsing
% 4.19/2.02 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.19/2.02 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------