TSTP Solution File: SEU214+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU214+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.49s 35.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 34 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 209 ( 37 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 38 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 301 ( 126 ~; 129 |; 28 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 13 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 7 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 3 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 91 ( 4 sgn 44 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t8_funct_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
<=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
& X2 = apply(X3,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t8_funct_1) ).
fof(d4_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_dom(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_1) ).
fof(d8_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( X3 = relation_composition(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4,X5] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
<=> ? [X6] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X6),X1)
& in(ordered_pair(X6,X5),X2) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_1) ).
fof(t22_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X3,X2)))
=> apply(relation_composition(X3,X2),X1) = apply(X2,apply(X3,X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t22_funct_1) ).
fof(fc1_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1)
& relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
& function(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fc1_funct_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& relation(X2) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_6,lemma,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6) )
& ( X5 = apply(X6,X4)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6) )
& ( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| X5 != apply(X6,X4)
| in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t8_funct_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
( ( ~ in(X7,X6)
| in(ordered_pair(X7,esk9_3(X5,X6,X7)),X5)
| X6 != relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X9),X5)
| in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk10_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk10_2(X5,X6),X11),X5)
| X6 = relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( in(esk10_2(X5,X6),X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk10_2(X5,X6),esk11_2(X5,X6)),X5)
| X6 = relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X10,X11,X13,X16] :
( ( in(ordered_pair(X10,esk4_5(X7,X8,X9,X10,X11)),X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X10,X11),X9)
| X9 != relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk4_5(X7,X8,X9,X10,X11),X11),X8)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X10,X11),X9)
| X9 != relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X10,X13),X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X13,X11),X8)
| in(ordered_pair(X10,X11),X9)
| X9 != relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk5_3(X7,X8,X9),esk6_3(X7,X8,X9)),X9)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk5_3(X7,X8,X9),X16),X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X16,esk6_3(X7,X8,X9)),X8)
| X9 = relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk5_3(X7,X8,X9),esk7_3(X7,X8,X9)),X7)
| in(ordered_pair(esk5_3(X7,X8,X9),esk6_3(X7,X8,X9)),X9)
| X9 = relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk7_3(X7,X8,X9),esk6_3(X7,X8,X9)),X8)
| in(ordered_pair(esk5_3(X7,X8,X9),esk6_3(X7,X8,X9)),X9)
| X9 = relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,lemma,
( X3 = apply(X1,X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X3,esk9_3(X1,X2,X3)),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_dom(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X3,X2)))
=> apply(relation_composition(X3,X2),X1) = apply(X2,apply(X3,X1)) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t22_funct_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X4,esk4_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,lemma,
( esk9_3(X1,X2,X3) = apply(X1,X3)
| X2 != relation_dom(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk2_0)
& function(esk2_0)
& relation(esk3_0)
& function(esk3_0)
& in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)))
& apply(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0),esk1_0) != apply(esk2_0,apply(esk3_0,esk1_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(esk4_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5),X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,lemma,
( esk4_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5) = apply(X1,X4)
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,lemma,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,apply(X2,X1)),X2)
| X3 != relation_dom(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_0,relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,lemma,
( in(ordered_pair(apply(X1,X2),X3),X4)
| X5 != relation_composition(X1,X4)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,apply(X1,esk1_0)),X1)
| relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != relation_dom(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(apply(X1,esk1_0),apply(X2,esk1_0)),X3)
| relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != relation_dom(X2)
| X2 != relation_composition(X1,X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( relation(relation_composition(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( function(relation_composition(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc1_funct_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| relation(relation_composition(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,lemma,
( apply(X1,esk1_0) = apply(X2,apply(X3,esk1_0))
| relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != relation_dom(X1)
| X1 != relation_composition(X3,X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ function(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( function(relation_composition(X2,X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
apply(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0),esk1_0) != apply(esk2_0,apply(esk3_0,esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,lemma,
( apply(X1,apply(X2,esk1_0)) = apply(relation_composition(X2,X1),esk1_0)
| relation_dom(relation_composition(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
function(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
function(esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_32])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU214+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 05:55:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.41/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.41/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.49/35.67 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.49/35.67
% 0.49/35.67 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.49/35.67 # OLD status Res
% 0.49/35.67 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.49/35.67 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 0.49/35.67 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_230b6c199cce1dcf6700db59e75a93feb83d1bd9 for 23 seconds:
% 0.49/35.67 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,01,20000,1.0)
% 0.49/35.67 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.49/35.67
% 0.49/35.67 # Proof found!
% 0.49/35.67 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.49/35.67 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.49/35.67 # Proof object total steps : 34
% 0.49/35.67 # Proof object clause steps : 21
% 0.49/35.67 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.49/35.67 # Proof object conjectures : 12
% 0.49/35.67 # Proof object clause conjectures : 9
% 0.49/35.67 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.49/35.67 # Proof object initial clauses used : 12
% 0.49/35.67 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.49/35.67 # Proof object generating inferences : 9
% 0.49/35.67 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 7
% 0.49/35.67 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.49/35.67 # Parsed axioms : 218
% 0.49/35.67 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 193
% 0.49/35.67 # Initial clauses : 56
% 0.49/35.67 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.49/35.67 # Initial clauses in saturation : 56
% 0.49/35.67 # Processed clauses : 8533
% 0.49/35.67 # ...of these trivial : 32
% 0.49/35.67 # ...subsumed : 3033
% 0.49/35.67 # ...remaining for further processing : 5468
% 0.49/35.67 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.49/35.67 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 46163
% 0.49/35.67 # Backward-subsumed : 687
% 0.49/35.67 # Backward-rewritten : 20
% 0.49/35.67 # Generated clauses : 153253
% 0.49/35.67 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 149053
% 0.49/35.67 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6156
% 0.49/35.67 # Paramodulations : 152468
% 0.49/35.67 # Factorizations : 6
% 0.49/35.67 # Equation resolutions : 740
% 0.49/35.67 # Current number of processed clauses : 4748
% 0.49/35.67 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.49/35.67 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.49/35.67 # Negative unit clauses : 14
% 0.49/35.67 # Non-unit-clauses : 4714
% 0.49/35.67 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 81708
% 0.49/35.67 # ...number of literals in the above : 1197335
% 0.49/35.67 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.49/35.67 # Current number of archived clauses : 707
% 0.49/35.67 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11133567
% 0.49/35.67 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 186382
% 0.49/35.67 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9868
% 0.49/35.67 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41897
% 0.49/35.67 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.49/35.67 # BW rewrite match attempts : 10
% 0.49/35.67 # BW rewrite match successes : 10
% 0.49/35.67 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.49/35.67 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.49/35.67 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7828120
% 0.49/35.67
% 0.49/35.67 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.49/35.67 # User time : 11.742 s
% 0.49/35.67 # System time : 0.109 s
% 0.49/35.67 # Total time : 11.851 s
% 0.49/35.67 # Maximum resident set size: 132808 pages
% 0.49/46.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.49/46.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.49/46.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.49/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.49/46.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.49/46.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.49/46.51 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------