TSTP Solution File: SEU212+1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SEU212+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:15:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.69s 1.92s
% Output   : Refutation 1.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   15 (   7 unt;   3 nHn;  14 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   33 (   9 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ in(B,relation_dom(A))
    | C != apply(A,B)
    | in(ordered_pair(B,C),A) ),
    file('SEU212+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(A)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ in(B,relation_dom(A))
    | C = apply(A,B)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(B,C),A) ),
    file('SEU212+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(A)
    | B != relation_dom(A)
    | in(C,B)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(C,D),A) ),
    file('SEU212+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(25,axiom,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair(dollar_c9,dollar_c8),dollar_c7)
    | ~ in(dollar_c9,relation_dom(dollar_c7))
    | dollar_c8 != apply(dollar_c7,dollar_c9) ),
    file('SEU212+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(26,plain,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair(dollar_c9,dollar_c8),dollar_c7)
    | ~ in(dollar_c9,relation_dom(dollar_c7))
    | apply(dollar_c7,dollar_c9) != dollar_c8 ),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[25])]),
    [iquote('copy,25,flip.3')] ).

cnf(29,axiom,
    A = A,
    file('SEU212+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(46,axiom,
    relation(dollar_c7),
    file('SEU212+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(47,axiom,
    function(dollar_c7),
    file('SEU212+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(48,axiom,
    ( in(ordered_pair(dollar_c9,dollar_c8),dollar_c7)
    | in(dollar_c9,relation_dom(dollar_c7)) ),
    file('SEU212+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(49,axiom,
    ( in(ordered_pair(dollar_c9,dollar_c8),dollar_c7)
    | dollar_c8 = apply(dollar_c7,dollar_c9) ),
    file('SEU212+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(50,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(dollar_c9,dollar_c8),dollar_c7)
    | apply(dollar_c7,dollar_c9) = dollar_c8 ),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[49])]),
    [iquote('copy,49,flip.2')] ).

cnf(152,plain,
    in(dollar_c9,relation_dom(dollar_c7)),
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[48,9,46,29])]),
    [iquote('hyper,48,9,46,29,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(197,plain,
    apply(dollar_c7,dollar_c9) = dollar_c8,
    inference(factor_simp,[status(thm)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[152,5,46,47,50])]),
    [iquote('hyper,152,5,46,47,50,factor_simp')] ).

cnf(198,plain,
    in(ordered_pair(dollar_c9,dollar_c8),dollar_c7),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[152,4,46,47,29]),197]),
    [iquote('hyper,152,4,46,47,29,demod,197')] ).

cnf(199,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_del,[status(thm)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(back_demod,[status(thm)],[26]),197]),198,152,29]),
    [iquote('back_demod,26,demod,197,unit_del,198,152,29')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU212+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 07:52:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.69/1.92  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.69/1.92  The process was started by sandbox2 on n019.cluster.edu,
% 1.69/1.92  Wed Jul 27 07:52:22 2022
% 1.69/1.92  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 19999.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.69/1.92  set(auto).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.69/1.92  clear(print_given).
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  formula_list(usable).
% 1.69/1.92  all A (A=A).
% 1.69/1.92  all A B (in(A,B)-> -in(B,A)).
% 1.69/1.92  all A (empty(A)->function(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  all A (empty(A)->relation(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  all A B (unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A)).
% 1.69/1.92  all A (relation(A)&function(A)-> (all B C ((in(B,relation_dom(A))-> (C=apply(A,B)<->in(ordered_pair(B,C),A)))& (-in(B,relation_dom(A))-> (C=apply(A,B)<->C=empty_set))))).
% 1.69/1.92  all A (relation(A)-> (all B (B=relation_dom(A)<-> (all C (in(C,B)<-> (exists D in(ordered_pair(C,D),A))))))).
% 1.69/1.92  all A B (ordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A))).
% 1.69/1.92  $T.
% 1.69/1.92  $T.
% 1.69/1.92  $T.
% 1.69/1.92  $T.
% 1.69/1.92  $T.
% 1.69/1.92  $T.
% 1.69/1.92  $T.
% 1.69/1.92  all A exists B element(B,A).
% 1.69/1.92  empty(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  relation(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  empty(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  all A B (-empty(ordered_pair(A,B))).
% 1.69/1.92  all A (-empty(singleton(A))).
% 1.69/1.92  all A B (-empty(unordered_pair(A,B))).
% 1.69/1.92  empty(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  relation(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  all A (-empty(A)&relation(A)-> -empty(relation_dom(A))).
% 1.69/1.92  all A (empty(A)->empty(relation_dom(A))&relation(relation_dom(A))).
% 1.69/1.92  exists A (relation(A)&function(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  exists A (empty(A)&relation(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  exists A empty(A).
% 1.69/1.92  exists A (-empty(A)&relation(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  exists A (-empty(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  exists A (relation(A)&relation_empty_yielding(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  all A B (in(A,B)->element(A,B)).
% 1.69/1.92  all A B (element(A,B)->empty(B)|in(A,B)).
% 1.69/1.92  all A (empty(A)->A=empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  all A B (-(in(A,B)&empty(B))).
% 1.69/1.92  all A B (-(empty(A)&A!=B&empty(B))).
% 1.69/1.92  -(all A B C (relation(C)&function(C)-> (in(ordered_pair(A,B),C)<->in(A,relation_dom(C))&B=apply(C,A)))).
% 1.69/1.92  end_of_list.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  -------> usable clausifies to:
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  list(usable).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] A=A.
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -empty(A)|function(A).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -empty(A)|relation(A).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)| -in(B,relation_dom(A))|C!=apply(A,B)|in(ordered_pair(B,C),A).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)| -in(B,relation_dom(A))|C=apply(A,B)| -in(ordered_pair(B,C),A).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)|in(B,relation_dom(A))|C!=apply(A,B)|C=empty_set.
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)|in(B,relation_dom(A))|C=apply(A,B)|C!=empty_set.
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -relation(A)|B!=relation_dom(A)| -in(C,B)|in(ordered_pair(C,$f1(A,B,C)),A).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -relation(A)|B!=relation_dom(A)|in(C,B)| -in(ordered_pair(C,D),A).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -relation(A)|B=relation_dom(A)|in($f3(A,B),B)|in(ordered_pair($f3(A,B),$f2(A,B)),A).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -relation(A)|B=relation_dom(A)| -in($f3(A,B),B)| -in(ordered_pair($f3(A,B),X1),A).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] ordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] $T.
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] $T.
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] $T.
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] $T.
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] $T.
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] $T.
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] $T.
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] element($f4(A),A).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] relation(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -empty(ordered_pair(A,B)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -empty(singleton(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -empty(unordered_pair(A,B)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] relation(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] empty(A)| -relation(A)| -empty(relation_dom(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -empty(A)|empty(relation_dom(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -empty(A)|relation(relation_dom(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] relation($c1).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] function($c1).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] empty($c2).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] relation($c2).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] empty($c3).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -empty($c4).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] relation($c4).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -empty($c5).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] relation($c6).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] relation_empty_yielding($c6).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -in(A,B)|element(A,B).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -element(A,B)|empty(B)|in(A,B).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -empty(A)|A=empty_set.
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -in(A,B)| -empty(B).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -empty(A)|A=B| -empty(B).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] relation($c7).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] function($c7).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] in(ordered_pair($c9,$c8),$c7)|in($c9,relation_dom($c7)).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] in(ordered_pair($c9,$c8),$c7)|$c8=apply($c7,$c9).
% 1.69/1.92  0 [] -in(ordered_pair($c9,$c8),$c7)| -in($c9,relation_dom($c7))|$c8!=apply($c7,$c9).
% 1.69/1.92  end_of_list.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.69/1.92  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, factoring, and unit
% 1.69/1.92  deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 1.69/1.92  clauses in usable.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.69/1.92     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  ------------> process usable:
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 1 [] -in(A,B)| -in(B,A).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 2 [] -empty(A)|function(A).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 3 [] -empty(A)|relation(A).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=18): 4 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)| -in(B,relation_dom(A))|C!=apply(A,B)|in(ordered_pair(B,C),A).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=18): 5 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)| -in(B,relation_dom(A))|C=apply(A,B)| -in(ordered_pair(B,C),A).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 6 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)|in(B,relation_dom(A))|C!=apply(A,B)|C=empty_set.
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 7 [] -relation(A)| -function(A)|in(B,relation_dom(A))|C=apply(A,B)|C!=empty_set.
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=17): 8 [] -relation(A)|B!=relation_dom(A)| -in(C,B)|in(ordered_pair(C,$f1(A,B,C)),A).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 9 [] -relation(A)|B!=relation_dom(A)|in(C,B)| -in(ordered_pair(C,D),A).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=20): 10 [] -relation(A)|B=relation_dom(A)|in($f3(A,B),B)|in(ordered_pair($f3(A,B),$f2(A,B)),A).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=18): 11 [] -relation(A)|B=relation_dom(A)| -in($f3(A,B),B)| -in(ordered_pair($f3(A,B),C),A).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 12 [] -empty(ordered_pair(A,B)).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 13 [] -empty(singleton(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 14 [] -empty(unordered_pair(A,B)).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 15 [] empty(A)| -relation(A)| -empty(relation_dom(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 16 [] -empty(A)|empty(relation_dom(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 17 [] -empty(A)|relation(relation_dom(A)).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 18 [] -empty($c4).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 19 [] -empty($c5).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 20 [] -in(A,B)|element(A,B).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 21 [] -element(A,B)|empty(B)|in(A,B).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 22 [] -empty(A)|A=empty_set.
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=5): 23 [] -in(A,B)| -empty(B).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 24 [] -empty(A)|A=B| -empty(B).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 26 [copy,25,flip.3] -in(ordered_pair($c9,$c8),$c7)| -in($c9,relation_dom($c7))|apply($c7,$c9)!=$c8.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  ------------> process sos:
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 29 [] A=A.
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 30 [] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 32 [copy,31,flip.1] unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A))=ordered_pair(A,B).
% 1.69/1.92  ---> New Demodulator: 33 [new_demod,32] unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A))=ordered_pair(A,B).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 34 [] element($f4(A),A).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 35 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 36 [] relation(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 37 [] relation_empty_yielding(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92    Following clause subsumed by 35 during input processing: 0 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92    Following clause subsumed by 35 during input processing: 0 [] empty(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92    Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] relation(empty_set).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 38 [] relation($c1).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 39 [] function($c1).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 40 [] empty($c2).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 41 [] relation($c2).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 42 [] empty($c3).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 43 [] relation($c4).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 44 [] relation($c6).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 45 [] relation_empty_yielding($c6).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 46 [] relation($c7).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 47 [] function($c7).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 48 [] in(ordered_pair($c9,$c8),$c7)|in($c9,relation_dom($c7)).
% 1.69/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 50 [copy,49,flip.2] in(ordered_pair($c9,$c8),$c7)|apply($c7,$c9)=$c8.
% 1.69/1.92    Following clause subsumed by 29 during input processing: 0 [copy,29,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.69/1.92  29 back subsumes 28.
% 1.69/1.92    Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [copy,30,flip.1] unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 1.69/1.92  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 33.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.01 sec ----> 199 [back_demod,26,demod,197,unit_del,198,152,29] $F.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.69/1.92  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.69/1.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.69/1.92  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  ============ end of search ============
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.69/1.92  clauses given                 27
% 1.69/1.92  clauses generated            222
% 1.69/1.92  clauses kept                 187
% 1.69/1.92  clauses forward subsumed     134
% 1.69/1.92  clauses back subsumed          5
% 1.69/1.92  Kbytes malloced             1953
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.69/1.92  user CPU time          0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.69/1.92  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.69/1.92  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.69/1.92  
% 1.69/1.92  Process 19999 finished Wed Jul 27 07:52:23 2022
% 1.69/1.92  Otter interrupted
% 1.69/1.92  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------