TSTP Solution File: SEU212+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU212+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:58:01 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.33s 2.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   29
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   55 (  16 unt;  26 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   61 (  26   ~;  21   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   26 (  16   >;  10   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  20 usr;  10 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (;  17   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ in > element > relation_empty_yielding > relation > function > empty > unordered_pair > ordered_pair > apply > #nlpp > singleton > relation_dom > empty_set > #skF_5 > #skF_11 > #skF_4 > #skF_7 > #skF_3 > #skF_10 > #skF_14 > #skF_6 > #skF_13 > #skF_9 > #skF_8 > #skF_2 > #skF_1 > #skF_12

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i > $i ).

tff(relation,type,
    relation: $i > $o ).

tff(singleton,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i ).

tff(apply,type,
    apply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(unordered_pair,type,
    unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(element,type,
    element: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(ordered_pair,type,
    ordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(function,type,
    function: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff(relation_empty_yielding,type,
    relation_empty_yielding: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff(relation_dom,type,
    relation_dom: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': $i ).

tff(f_168,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( ( relation(C)
          & function(C) )
       => ( in(ordered_pair(A,B),C)
        <=> ( in(A,relation_dom(C))
            & ( B = apply(C,A) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_funct_1) ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( relation(A)
        & function(A) )
     => ! [B,C] :
          ( ( in(B,relation_dom(A))
           => ( ( C = apply(A,B) )
            <=> in(ordered_pair(B,C),A) ) )
          & ( ~ in(B,relation_dom(A))
           => ( ( C = apply(A,B) )
            <=> ( C = empty_set ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_funct_1) ).

tff(f_70,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => ! [B] :
          ( ( B = relation_dom(A) )
        <=> ! [C] :
              ( in(C,B)
            <=> ? [D] : in(ordered_pair(C,D),A) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_1) ).

tff(c_112,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair('#skF_12','#skF_13'),'#skF_14')
    | ( apply('#skF_14','#skF_12') = '#skF_13' ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_168]) ).

tff(c_124,plain,
    apply('#skF_14','#skF_12') = '#skF_13',
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_112]) ).

tff(c_116,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair('#skF_12','#skF_13'),'#skF_14')
    | in('#skF_12',relation_dom('#skF_14')) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_168]) ).

tff(c_120,plain,
    in('#skF_12',relation_dom('#skF_14')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_116]) ).

tff(c_106,plain,
    ( ( apply('#skF_14','#skF_12') != '#skF_13' )
    | ~ in('#skF_12',relation_dom('#skF_14'))
    | ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_12','#skF_13'),'#skF_14') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_168]) ).

tff(c_164,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_12','#skF_13'),'#skF_14'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_106]) ).

tff(c_104,plain,
    relation('#skF_14'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_168]) ).

tff(c_102,plain,
    function('#skF_14'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_168]) ).

tff(c_578,plain,
    ! [B_118,A_119] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(B_118,apply(A_119,B_118)),A_119)
      | ~ in(B_118,relation_dom(A_119))
      | ~ function(A_119)
      | ~ relation(A_119) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_595,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair('#skF_12','#skF_13'),'#skF_14')
    | ~ in('#skF_12',relation_dom('#skF_14'))
    | ~ function('#skF_14')
    | ~ relation('#skF_14') ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_124,c_578]) ).

tff(c_604,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('#skF_12','#skF_13'),'#skF_14'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_104,c_102,c_120,c_595]) ).

tff(c_606,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_604]) ).

tff(c_607,plain,
    ( ~ in('#skF_12',relation_dom('#skF_14'))
    | ( apply('#skF_14','#skF_12') != '#skF_13' ) ),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_106]) ).

tff(c_717,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_124,c_120,c_607]) ).

tff(c_719,plain,
    apply('#skF_14','#skF_12') != '#skF_13',
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_112]) ).

tff(c_718,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('#skF_12','#skF_13'),'#skF_14'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_112]) ).

tff(c_1401,plain,
    ! [A_196,B_197,C_198] :
      ( ( apply(A_196,B_197) = C_198 )
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(B_197,C_198),A_196)
      | ~ in(B_197,relation_dom(A_196))
      | ~ function(A_196)
      | ~ relation(A_196) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_1418,plain,
    ( ( apply('#skF_14','#skF_12') = '#skF_13' )
    | ~ in('#skF_12',relation_dom('#skF_14'))
    | ~ function('#skF_14')
    | ~ relation('#skF_14') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_718,c_1401]) ).

tff(c_1426,plain,
    apply('#skF_14','#skF_12') = '#skF_13',
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_104,c_102,c_120,c_1418]) ).

tff(c_1428,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_719,c_1426]) ).

tff(c_1430,plain,
    ~ in('#skF_12',relation_dom('#skF_14')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_116]) ).

tff(c_1429,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('#skF_12','#skF_13'),'#skF_14'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_116]) ).

tff(c_1789,plain,
    ! [C_238,A_239,D_240] :
      ( in(C_238,relation_dom(A_239))
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(C_238,D_240),A_239)
      | ~ relation(A_239) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_70]) ).

tff(c_1796,plain,
    ( in('#skF_12',relation_dom('#skF_14'))
    | ~ relation('#skF_14') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1429,c_1789]) ).

tff(c_1800,plain,
    in('#skF_12',relation_dom('#skF_14')),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_104,c_1796]) ).

tff(c_1802,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_1430,c_1800]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SEU212+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.18/0.35  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 12:22:22 EDT 2023
% 0.18/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.33/2.33  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.33/2.33  
% 4.33/2.33  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.33/2.36  
% 4.33/2.36  Inference rules
% 4.33/2.36  ----------------------
% 4.33/2.36  #Ref     : 0
% 4.33/2.36  #Sup     : 408
% 4.33/2.36  #Fact    : 0
% 4.33/2.36  #Define  : 0
% 4.33/2.36  #Split   : 9
% 4.33/2.36  #Chain   : 0
% 4.33/2.36  #Close   : 0
% 4.33/2.36  
% 4.33/2.36  Ordering : KBO
% 4.33/2.36  
% 4.33/2.36  Simplification rules
% 4.33/2.36  ----------------------
% 4.33/2.36  #Subsume      : 52
% 4.33/2.36  #Demod        : 148
% 4.33/2.36  #Tautology    : 201
% 4.33/2.36  #SimpNegUnit  : 16
% 4.33/2.36  #BackRed      : 24
% 4.33/2.36  
% 4.33/2.36  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.33/2.36  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.33/2.36  
% 4.33/2.36  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.33/2.36  ----------------------
% 4.33/2.36  Preprocessing        : 0.56
% 4.33/2.36  Parsing              : 0.28
% 4.33/2.36  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 4.33/2.36  Main loop            : 0.65
% 4.33/2.36  Inferencing          : 0.23
% 4.33/2.36  Reduction            : 0.21
% 4.33/2.36  Demodulation         : 0.15
% 4.33/2.36  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 4.33/2.36  Subsumption          : 0.12
% 4.33/2.36  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.33/2.36  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.33/2.36  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.33/2.36  Total                : 1.26
% 4.33/2.36  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.33/2.36  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.33/2.36  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.33/2.36  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------