TSTP Solution File: SEU210+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU210+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  163 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  188 (  81   ~;  69   |;  23   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  102 (  11 sgn  58   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t6_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( empty(X1)
     => X1 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t6_boole) ).

fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ? [X1] : empty(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',rc1_xboole_0) ).

fof(t3_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1] :
      ( subset(X1,empty_set)
     => X1 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t3_xboole_1) ).

fof(t3_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t3_subset) ).

fof(existence_m1_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
    ? [X2] : element(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',existence_m1_subset_1) ).

fof(t166_relat_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( in(X1,relation_inverse_image(X3,X2))
      <=> ? [X4] :
            ( in(X4,relation_rng(X3))
            & in(ordered_pair(X1,X4),X3)
            & in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t166_relat_1) ).

fof(t20_relat_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
       => ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
          & in(X2,relation_rng(X3)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t20_relat_1) ).

fof(t174_relat_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ~ ( X1 != empty_set
          & subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))
          & relation_inverse_image(X2,X1) = empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t174_relat_1) ).

fof(t5_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ~ ( in(X1,X2)
        & element(X2,powerset(X3))
        & empty(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t5_subset) ).

fof(d5_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
        <=> ! [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X2)
            <=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d5_relat_1) ).

fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d3_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ empty(X2)
      | X2 = empty_set ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t6_boole])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    empty(esk17_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[rc1_xboole_0])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,lemma,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ subset(X2,empty_set)
      | X2 = empty_set ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_xboole_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | ~ empty(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    empty(esk17_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ element(X3,powerset(X4))
        | subset(X3,X4) )
      & ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
        | element(X3,powerset(X4)) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X3] : element(esk31_1(X3),X3),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[existence_m1_subset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,lemma,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X9] :
      ( ( in(esk9_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_rng(X7))
        | ~ in(X5,relation_inverse_image(X7,X6))
        | ~ relation(X7) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(X5,esk9_3(X5,X6,X7)),X7)
        | ~ in(X5,relation_inverse_image(X7,X6))
        | ~ relation(X7) )
      & ( in(esk9_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
        | ~ in(X5,relation_inverse_image(X7,X6))
        | ~ relation(X7) )
      & ( ~ in(X9,relation_rng(X7))
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X9),X7)
        | ~ in(X9,X6)
        | in(X5,relation_inverse_image(X7,X6))
        | ~ relation(X7) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t166_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_20,lemma,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(X5,relation_rng(X6))
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
        | ~ relation(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_relat_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( relation(X2)
       => ~ ( X1 != empty_set
            & subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))
            & relation_inverse_image(X2,X1) = empty_set ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t174_relat_1]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ in(X4,X5)
      | ~ element(X5,powerset(X6))
      | ~ empty(X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t5_subset])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,lemma,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | ~ subset(X1,empty_set) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    empty_set = esk17_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    element(esk31_1(X1),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,lemma,
    ( in(X2,relation_inverse_image(X1,X3))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X4,X3)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X4),X1)
    | ~ in(X4,relation_rng(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,lemma,
    ( in(X3,relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
      ( ( ~ in(X7,X6)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk11_3(X5,X6,X7),X7),X5)
        | X6 != relation_rng(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X9,X7),X5)
        | in(X7,X6)
        | X6 != relation_rng(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk12_2(X5,X6),X6)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X11,esk12_2(X5,X6)),X5)
        | X6 = relation_rng(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) )
      & ( in(esk12_2(X5,X6),X6)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk13_2(X5,X6),esk12_2(X5,X6)),X5)
        | X6 = relation_rng(X5)
        | ~ relation(X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk2_0)
    & esk1_0 != empty_set
    & subset(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk2_0))
    & relation_inverse_image(esk2_0,esk1_0) = empty_set ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ empty(X1)
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(X1))
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,lemma,
    ( X1 = esk17_0
    | ~ subset(X1,esk17_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    subset(esk31_1(powerset(X1)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,lemma,
    ( in(X1,relation_inverse_image(X2,X3))
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X4),X2)
    | ~ in(X4,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk11_3(X1,X2,X3),X3),X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    relation_inverse_image(esk2_0,esk1_0) = empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ empty(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,esk31_1(powerset(X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,lemma,
    esk31_1(powerset(esk17_0)) = esk17_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

fof(c_0_39,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3] :
      ( ( X3 != empty_set
        | ~ in(X4,X3) )
      & ( in(esk3_1(X3),X3)
        | X3 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,lemma,
    ( in(esk11_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_inverse_image(X1,X4))
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X4)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    relation_inverse_image(esk2_0,esk1_0) = esk17_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,lemma,
    ~ in(X1,esk17_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | in(esk3_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

fof(c_0_46,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ in(X6,X4)
        | in(X6,X5) )
      & ( in(esk10_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk10_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 != relation_rng(esk2_0)
    | ~ in(X2,esk1_0)
    | ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42])]),c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( X1 = esk17_0
    | in(esk3_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 != esk17_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 != relation_rng(esk2_0)
    | ~ in(esk3_1(esk1_0),X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]),c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(X1,relation_rng(esk2_0))
    | ~ in(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk3_1(esk1_0),esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_48]),c_0_49]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU210+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 03:15:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 56
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 31
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 25
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 14
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 11
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 15
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 12
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 11
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 13
% 0.23/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 207
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 154
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 104
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 102
% 0.23/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 1415
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 18
% 0.23/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 884
% 0.23/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 513
% 0.23/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.23/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 21
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 30
% 0.23/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 5458
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 4932
% 0.23/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 414
% 0.23/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 5398
% 0.23/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 58
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 460
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 33
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 24
% 0.23/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 403
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3431
% 0.23/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 15547
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 51
% 0.23/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 27025
% 0.23/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18827
% 0.23/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 918
% 0.23/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 575
% 0.23/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 12
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 68475
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42  # User time                : 0.173 s
% 0.23/1.42  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Total time               : 0.180 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 7336 pages
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------