TSTP Solution File: SEU204+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU204+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   66 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   72 (  26   ~;  28   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   4 sgn  25   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t143_relat_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( in(X1,relation_image(X3,X2))
      <=> ? [X4] :
            ( in(X4,relation_dom(X3))
            & in(ordered_pair(X4,X1),X3)
            & in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t143_relat_1) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(t144_relat_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => subset(relation_image(X2,X1),relation_rng(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t144_relat_1) ).

fof(t20_relat_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
       => ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
          & in(X2,relation_rng(X3)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t20_relat_1) ).

fof(c_0_4,lemma,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X9] :
      ( ( in(esk10_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X7))
        | ~ in(X5,relation_image(X7,X6))
        | ~ relation(X7) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk10_3(X5,X6,X7),X5),X7)
        | ~ in(X5,relation_image(X7,X6))
        | ~ relation(X7) )
      & ( in(esk10_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
        | ~ in(X5,relation_image(X7,X6))
        | ~ relation(X7) )
      & ( ~ in(X9,relation_dom(X7))
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X9,X5),X7)
        | ~ in(X9,X6)
        | in(X5,relation_image(X7,X6))
        | ~ relation(X7) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t143_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ in(X6,X4)
        | in(X6,X5) )
      & ( in(esk3_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk3_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( relation(X2)
       => subset(relation_image(X2,X1),relation_rng(X2)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t144_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,lemma,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk10_3(X2,X3,X1),X2),X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_image(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk2_0)
    & ~ subset(relation_image(esk2_0,esk1_0),relation_rng(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,lemma,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
        | ~ relation(X6) )
      & ( in(X5,relation_rng(X6))
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
        | ~ relation(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_relat_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,lemma,
    ( subset(relation_image(X1,X2),X3)
    | in(ordered_pair(esk10_3(esk3_2(relation_image(X1,X2),X3),X2,X1),esk3_2(relation_image(X1,X2),X3)),X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,lemma,
    ( in(X3,relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(relation_image(esk2_0,X1),X2)
    | in(ordered_pair(esk10_3(esk3_2(relation_image(esk2_0,X1),X2),X1,esk2_0),esk3_2(relation_image(esk2_0,X1),X2)),esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,lemma,
    ( subset(relation_image(esk2_0,X1),X2)
    | in(esk3_2(relation_image(esk2_0,X1),X2),relation_rng(esk2_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_image(esk2_0,esk1_0),relation_rng(esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,lemma,
    subset(relation_image(esk2_0,X1),relation_rng(esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU204+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 11:50:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.022 s
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 20
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 11
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 7
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
% 0.23/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 199
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 157
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 85
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 83
% 0.23/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 4537
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 867
% 0.23/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 1836
% 0.23/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1834
% 0.23/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 83
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 38
% 0.23/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 10264
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 9840
% 0.23/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1096
% 0.23/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 10079
% 0.23/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 22
% 0.23/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 158
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1708
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 24
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 8
% 0.23/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1676
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5128
% 0.23/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 20228
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 123
% 0.23/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 438045
% 0.23/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 262129
% 0.23/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2928
% 0.23/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3446
% 0.23/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 25
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 24
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 271919
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42  # User time                : 0.506 s
% 0.23/1.42  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Total time               : 0.514 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 12060 pages
% 0.23/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.23/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------