TSTP Solution File: SEU201+2 by SATCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SEU201+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:12:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.29s 1.43s
% Output   : Proof 7.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    relation(sK54),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t119_relat_1)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    ~ sPE(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54)),set_intersection2(relation_rng(sK54),sK53)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t119_relat_1)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    ( sPE(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54)),set_intersection2(relation_rng(sK54),sK53))
    | in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54)))
    | sP10(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),relation_rng(sK54))
    | ~ in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),sK53)
    | sPE(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54)),set_intersection2(relation_rng(sK54),sK53))
    | sP10(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54)))
    | ~ sP10(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54)))
    | ~ relation(sK54)
    | in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),sK53) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_relat_1)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54)))
    | ~ relation(sK54)
    | in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),relation_rng(sK54)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_relat_1)]) ).

cnf(g7,plain,
    ( in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),sK53)
    | ~ sP10(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0)]) ).

cnf(g8,plain,
    ( in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),relation_rng(sK54))
    | ~ sP10(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0)]) ).

cnf(g9,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),sK53)
    | ~ in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),relation_rng(sK54))
    | ~ relation(sK54)
    | in(sK27(relation_rng(sK54),sK53,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK53,sK54))) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_relat_1)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SEU201+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 11:10:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 7.29/1.43  % symbols: 116
% 7.29/1.43  % clauses: 477
% 7.29/1.43  % start clauses: 2
% 7.29/1.43  % iterative deepening steps: 2288
% 7.29/1.43  % maximum path limit: 3
% 7.29/1.43  % literal attempts: 2230398
% 7.29/1.43  % depth failures: 2084609
% 7.29/1.43  % regularity failures: 12820
% 7.29/1.43  % tautology failures: 6051
% 7.29/1.43  % reductions: 46522
% 7.29/1.43  % extensions: 2182172
% 7.29/1.43  % SAT variables: 233713
% 7.29/1.43  % SAT clauses: 234651
% 7.29/1.43  % WalkSAT solutions: 234645
% 7.29/1.43  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 7.29/1.43  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 7.29/1.43  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------