TSTP Solution File: SEU201+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU201+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 38.39s 6.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 38.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 11 unt; 10 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 72 ( 14 equ; 31 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 50 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_234,negated_conjecture,
set_difference(relation_rng(esk55_0),set_difference(relation_rng(esk55_0),esk54_0)) != relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e8p1fau2/input.p',i_0_234) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,X2)) = set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e8p1fau2/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_83,plain,
( X1 = set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X3))
| in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)
| in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e8p1fau2/input.p',i_0_83) ).
cnf(i_0_226,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_rng(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e8p1fau2/input.p',i_0_226) ).
cnf(i_0_84,plain,
( X1 = set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X3))
| in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)
| in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e8p1fau2/input.p',i_0_84) ).
cnf(i_0_227,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e8p1fau2/input.p',i_0_227) ).
cnf(i_0_235,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk55_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e8p1fau2/input.p',i_0_235) ).
cnf(i_0_228,lemma,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e8p1fau2/input.p',i_0_228) ).
cnf(i_0_85,plain,
( X1 = set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X3))
| ~ in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)
| ~ in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X3)
| ~ in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-e8p1fau2/input.p',i_0_85) ).
cnf(c_0_245,negated_conjecture,
set_difference(relation_rng(esk55_0),set_difference(relation_rng(esk55_0),esk54_0)) != relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0)),
i_0_234 ).
cnf(c_0_246,plain,
set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,X2)) = set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X1)),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_247,negated_conjecture,
relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0)) != set_difference(esk54_0,set_difference(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_245,c_0_246]) ).
cnf(c_0_248,plain,
( X1 = set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X3))
| in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)
| in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X3) ),
i_0_83 ).
cnf(c_0_249,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk28_3(X1,X2,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0)))
| in(esk28_3(X1,X2,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),X2)
| set_difference(X1,set_difference(X1,X2)) != set_difference(esk54_0,set_difference(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_247,c_0_248]) ).
cnf(c_0_250,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_rng(X3)) ),
i_0_226 ).
cnf(c_0_251,plain,
( X1 = set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X3))
| in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)
| in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X2) ),
i_0_84 ).
cnf(c_0_252,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X3,X2))) ),
i_0_227 ).
cnf(c_0_253,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk28_3(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0)))
| in(esk28_3(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),relation_rng(esk55_0)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_249]) ).
cnf(c_0_254,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk55_0),
i_0_235 ).
cnf(c_0_255,lemma,
( X1 = set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X3))
| in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X4)))
| in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X2)
| ~ in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),relation_rng(X4))
| ~ relation(X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_250,c_0_251]) ).
cnf(c_0_256,lemma,
in(esk28_3(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),relation_rng(esk55_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_252,c_0_253]),c_0_254])]) ).
cnf(c_0_257,lemma,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3))) ),
i_0_228 ).
cnf(c_0_258,lemma,
( in(esk28_3(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0)),esk55_0)))
| in(esk28_3(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),esk54_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_255,c_0_256]),c_0_254])]),c_0_247]) ).
cnf(c_0_259,plain,
( X1 = set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X3))
| ~ in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)
| ~ in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X3)
| ~ in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X2) ),
i_0_85 ).
cnf(c_0_260,lemma,
( in(esk28_3(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0)))
| in(esk28_3(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),esk54_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_257,c_0_258]),c_0_254])]) ).
cnf(c_0_261,plain,
( ~ in(esk28_3(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0)))
| ~ in(esk28_3(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),esk54_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_259,c_0_256]),c_0_247]) ).
cnf(c_0_262,lemma,
in(esk28_3(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),esk54_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_257,c_0_260]),c_0_254])]) ).
cnf(c_0_263,lemma,
( X1 = set_difference(X2,set_difference(X2,X3))
| in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X4)))
| in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),X1)
| ~ in(esk28_3(X2,X3,X1),relation_rng(X4))
| ~ relation(X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_250,c_0_251]) ).
cnf(c_0_264,plain,
~ in(esk28_3(esk54_0,relation_rng(esk55_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk54_0,esk55_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_261,c_0_262])]) ).
cnf(c_0_265,lemma,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_263,c_0_256]),c_0_254])]),c_0_247]),c_0_264]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SEU201+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 11:15:16 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 38.39/6.17 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by Enigma+tptp-cade20-model03-h2e15+lgb-t150-d30-l6400-e0.15+coop-eprover66:
% 38.39/6.17 # ENIGMA: LightGBM model '/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/data/Enigma/tptp-cade20-model03-h2e15/lgb-t150-d30-l6400-e0.15/model.lgb' loaded. (hash_base: 32768; conj_feats: 40; version: 991; iters: 150)
% 38.39/6.17 # Preprocessing time : 0.836 s
% 38.39/6.17 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 38.39/6.17
% 38.39/6.17 # Proof found!
% 38.39/6.17 # SZS status Theorem
% 38.39/6.17 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 38.39/6.17 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 38.39/6.17
% 38.39/6.17 # -------------------------------------------------
% 38.39/6.17 # User time : 3.740 s
% 38.39/6.17 # System time : 0.143 s
% 38.39/6.17 # Total time : 3.883 s
% 38.39/6.17 # ...preprocessing : 0.836 s
% 38.39/6.17 # ...main loop : 3.047 s
% 38.39/6.17 # Maximum resident set size: 169048 pages
% 38.39/6.17
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------