TSTP Solution File: SEU200+1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SEU200+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:30:52 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 41 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 39 ( 16 ~; 13 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 5 sgn; 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t118_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_rng(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.meAi9HUyHl/E---3.1_1981.p',t118_relat_1) ).
fof(t117_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> subset(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.meAi9HUyHl/E---3.1_1981.p',t117_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k8_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.meAi9HUyHl/E---3.1_1981.p',dt_k8_relat_1) ).
fof(t25_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( subset(X1,X2)
=> ( subset(relation_dom(X1),relation_dom(X2))
& subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_rng(X2)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.meAi9HUyHl/E---3.1_1981.p',t25_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)),relation_rng(X2)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t118_relat_1]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ~ relation(X8)
| subset(relation_rng_restriction(X7,X8),X8) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t117_relat_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk2_0)
& ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk1_0,esk2_0)),relation_rng(esk2_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X15,X16] :
( ~ relation(X16)
| relation(relation_rng_restriction(X15,X16)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k8_relat_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X9,X10] :
( ( subset(relation_dom(X9),relation_dom(X10))
| ~ subset(X9,X10)
| ~ relation(X10)
| ~ relation(X9) )
& ( subset(relation_rng(X9),relation_rng(X10))
| ~ subset(X9,X10)
| ~ relation(X10)
| ~ relation(X9) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t25_relat_1])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( subset(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1),X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_rng(X2))
| ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
subset(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk2_0),esk2_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk2_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk1_0,esk2_0)),relation_rng(esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk2_0)),relation_rng(esk2_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_10]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10 % Problem : SEU200+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 09:33:06 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.meAi9HUyHl/E---3.1_1981.p
% 0.15/0.42 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # sh5l with pid 2067 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with pid 2074 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S0S with 163s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 34
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 39
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 39
% 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 58
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 54
% 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 82
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 70
% 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 82
% 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 33
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 45
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 26
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 41
% 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 49
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 46
% 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 41
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2422
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1872 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------