TSTP Solution File: SEU199+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU199+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:59 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 11.78s 3.80s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   31
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (   7 unt;  26 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   63 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   72 (  33   ~;  27   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   35 (  19   >;  16   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   21 (  21 usr;   7 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (;  36   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > in > element > relation > empty > unordered_pair > relation_rng_restriction > ordered_pair > #nlpp > singleton > powerset > empty_set > #skF_9 > #skF_7 > #skF_6 > #skF_1 > #skF_11 > #skF_15 > #skF_4 > #skF_10 > #skF_14 > #skF_13 > #skF_2 > #skF_8 > #skF_3 > #skF_12 > #skF_5

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i > $i ).

tff(relation,type,
    relation: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(singleton,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': $i ).

tff(unordered_pair,type,
    unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(element,type,
    element: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(ordered_pair,type,
    ordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(relation_rng_restriction,type,
    relation_rng_restriction: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(powerset,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_124,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( relation(B)
       => subset(relation_rng_restriction(A,B),B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t117_relat_1) ).

tff(f_70,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( relation(B)
     => relation(relation_rng_restriction(A,B)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k8_relat_1) ).

tff(f_63,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => ! [B] :
          ( relation(B)
         => ( subset(A,B)
          <=> ! [C,D] :
                ( in(ordered_pair(C,D),A)
               => in(ordered_pair(C,D),B) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_relat_1) ).

tff(f_160,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ~ ( in(A,B)
        & empty(B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).

tff(f_51,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( relation(B)
     => ! [C] :
          ( relation(C)
         => ( ( C = relation_rng_restriction(A,B) )
          <=> ! [D,E] :
                ( in(ordered_pair(D,E),C)
              <=> ( in(E,A)
                  & in(ordered_pair(D,E),B) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d12_relat_1) ).

tff(c_88,plain,
    relation('#skF_15'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_124]) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ! [A_43,B_44] :
      ( relation(relation_rng_restriction(A_43,B_44))
      | ~ relation(B_44) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_70]) ).

tff(c_439,plain,
    ! [A_135,B_136] :
      ( in(ordered_pair('#skF_5'(A_135,B_136),'#skF_6'(A_135,B_136)),A_135)
      | subset(A_135,B_136)
      | ~ relation(B_136)
      | ~ relation(A_135) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_104,plain,
    ! [B_73,A_72] :
      ( ~ empty(B_73)
      | ~ in(A_72,B_73) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_160]) ).

tff(c_484,plain,
    ! [A_140,B_141] :
      ( ~ empty(A_140)
      | subset(A_140,B_141)
      | ~ relation(B_141)
      | ~ relation(A_140) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_439,c_104]) ).

tff(c_86,plain,
    ~ subset(relation_rng_restriction('#skF_14','#skF_15'),'#skF_15'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_124]) ).

tff(c_487,plain,
    ( ~ empty(relation_rng_restriction('#skF_14','#skF_15'))
    | ~ relation('#skF_15')
    | ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction('#skF_14','#skF_15')) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_484,c_86]) ).

tff(c_490,plain,
    ( ~ empty(relation_rng_restriction('#skF_14','#skF_15'))
    | ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction('#skF_14','#skF_15')) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_88,c_487]) ).

tff(c_491,plain,
    ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction('#skF_14','#skF_15')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_490]) ).

tff(c_494,plain,
    ~ relation('#skF_15'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_491]) ).

tff(c_501,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_88,c_494]) ).

tff(c_503,plain,
    relation(relation_rng_restriction('#skF_14','#skF_15')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_490]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ! [A_24,B_34] :
      ( in(ordered_pair('#skF_5'(A_24,B_34),'#skF_6'(A_24,B_34)),A_24)
      | subset(A_24,B_34)
      | ~ relation(B_34)
      | ~ relation(A_24) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_664,plain,
    ! [D_168,E_169,B_170,A_171] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(D_168,E_169),B_170)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(D_168,E_169),relation_rng_restriction(A_171,B_170))
      | ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(A_171,B_170))
      | ~ relation(B_170) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_14618,plain,
    ! [A_595,B_596,B_597] :
      ( in(ordered_pair('#skF_5'(relation_rng_restriction(A_595,B_596),B_597),'#skF_6'(relation_rng_restriction(A_595,B_596),B_597)),B_596)
      | ~ relation(B_596)
      | subset(relation_rng_restriction(A_595,B_596),B_597)
      | ~ relation(B_597)
      | ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(A_595,B_596)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_30,c_664]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ! [A_24,B_34] :
      ( ~ in(ordered_pair('#skF_5'(A_24,B_34),'#skF_6'(A_24,B_34)),B_34)
      | subset(A_24,B_34)
      | ~ relation(B_34)
      | ~ relation(A_24) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_14875,plain,
    ! [A_598,B_599] :
      ( subset(relation_rng_restriction(A_598,B_599),B_599)
      | ~ relation(B_599)
      | ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(A_598,B_599)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14618,c_28]) ).

tff(c_14895,plain,
    ( ~ relation('#skF_15')
    | ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction('#skF_14','#skF_15')) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14875,c_86]) ).

tff(c_14975,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_503,c_88,c_14895]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SEU199+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 11:28:52 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 11.78/3.80  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.78/3.81  
% 11.78/3.81  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 11.78/3.84  
% 11.78/3.84  Inference rules
% 11.78/3.84  ----------------------
% 11.78/3.84  #Ref     : 0
% 11.78/3.84  #Sup     : 3692
% 11.78/3.84  #Fact    : 0
% 11.78/3.84  #Define  : 0
% 11.78/3.84  #Split   : 23
% 11.78/3.84  #Chain   : 0
% 11.78/3.84  #Close   : 0
% 11.78/3.84  
% 11.78/3.84  Ordering : KBO
% 11.78/3.84  
% 11.78/3.84  Simplification rules
% 11.78/3.84  ----------------------
% 11.78/3.84  #Subsume      : 1644
% 11.78/3.84  #Demod        : 1956
% 11.78/3.84  #Tautology    : 1012
% 11.78/3.84  #SimpNegUnit  : 245
% 11.78/3.84  #BackRed      : 121
% 11.78/3.84  
% 11.78/3.84  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 11.78/3.84  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 11.78/3.84  
% 11.78/3.84  Timing (in seconds)
% 11.78/3.84  ----------------------
% 11.78/3.84  Preprocessing        : 0.57
% 11.78/3.84  Parsing              : 0.29
% 11.78/3.84  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 11.78/3.84  Main loop            : 2.20
% 11.78/3.84  Inferencing          : 0.65
% 11.78/3.84  Reduction            : 0.76
% 11.78/3.84  Demodulation         : 0.57
% 11.78/3.84  BG Simplification    : 0.06
% 11.78/3.84  Subsumption          : 0.57
% 11.78/3.84  Abstraction          : 0.08
% 11.78/3.84  MUC search           : 0.00
% 11.78/3.84  Cooper               : 0.00
% 11.78/3.84  Total                : 2.82
% 11.78/3.84  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 11.78/3.84  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 11.78/3.84  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 11.78/3.84  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------