TSTP Solution File: SEU198+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEU198+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 09:20:56 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.70s 0.87s
% Output   : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   81 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   90 (  34   ~;  28   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (  47   !;   7   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f122,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f119,f55]) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    relation(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ( ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK0,sK1)),sK0)
    & relation(sK1) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f34,f42]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),X0)
        & relation(X1) )
   => ( ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK0,sK1)),sK0)
      & relation(sK1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),X0)
      & relation(X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( relation(X1)
       => subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),X0) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f23,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hmCK2kzmfc/Vampire---4.8_7323',t116_relat_1) ).

fof(f119,plain,
    ~ relation(sK1),
    inference(resolution,[],[f108,f56]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK0,sK1)),sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0)),X1)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f101]) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0)),X1)
      | subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0)),X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f82,f76]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(sK4(X0,X1),X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ( ~ in(sK4(X0,X1),X1)
          & in(sK4(X0,X1),X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
            | ~ in(X3,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4])],[f52,f53]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( ~ in(X2,X1)
          & in(X2,X0) )
     => ( ~ in(sK4(X0,X1),X1)
        & in(sK4(X0,X1),X0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X1)
            & in(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
            | ~ in(X3,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f51]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X1)
            & in(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X1)
            | ~ in(X2,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
          | ~ in(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X0)
         => in(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hmCK2kzmfc/Vampire---4.8_7323',d3_tarski) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( in(sK4(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),X2),X0)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),X2) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f57,f75]) ).

fof(f75,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(sK4(X0,X1),X0)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)))
      | in(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ( in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)))
          | ~ in(X0,relation_rng(X2))
          | ~ in(X0,X1) )
        & ( ( in(X0,relation_rng(X2))
            & in(X0,X1) )
          | ~ in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))) ) )
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ( in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)))
          | ~ in(X0,relation_rng(X2))
          | ~ in(X0,X1) )
        & ( ( in(X0,relation_rng(X2))
            & in(X0,X1) )
          | ~ in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))) ) )
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)))
      <=> ( in(X0,relation_rng(X2))
          & in(X0,X1) ) )
      | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)))
      <=> ( in(X0,relation_rng(X2))
          & in(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hmCK2kzmfc/Vampire---4.8_7323',t115_relat_1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SEU198+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 11:28:44 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.14/0.34  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.hmCK2kzmfc/Vampire---4.8_7323
% 0.70/0.87  % (7595)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (7592)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (7593)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (7596)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (7597)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (7599)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (7600)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (7597)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (7597)------------------------------
% 0.70/0.87  % (7597)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.70/0.87  % (7597)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.70/0.87  
% 0.70/0.87  % (7597)Memory used [KB]: 962
% 0.70/0.87  % (7597)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.70/0.87  % (7597)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.70/0.87  % (7594)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (7597)------------------------------
% 0.70/0.87  % (7597)------------------------------
% 0.70/0.87  % (7592)First to succeed.
% 0.70/0.87  % (7599)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.87  % (7595)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.87  % (7596)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.87  % (7600)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.87  % (7592)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-7528"
% 0.70/0.87  % (7592)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.70/0.87  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.70/0.87  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.70/0.87  % (7592)------------------------------
% 0.70/0.87  % (7592)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.70/0.87  % (7592)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.70/0.87  
% 0.70/0.87  % (7592)Memory used [KB]: 1069
% 0.70/0.87  % (7592)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.70/0.87  % (7592)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.70/0.87  % (7528)Success in time 0.528 s
% 0.70/0.88  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------