TSTP Solution File: SEU198+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SEU198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:49:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.68s 2.87s
% Output   : Proof 2.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 21:44:09 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.68/2.87  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.68/2.87  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 2.68/2.87  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 2.68/2.87  % SZS output start Proof
% 2.68/2.87  1. (relation T_0) (-. (relation T_0))   ### Axiom
% 2.68/2.87  2. (in T_1 (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0))) (-. (in T_1 (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0))))   ### Axiom
% 2.68/2.87  3. (-. (in T_1 T_2)) (in T_1 T_2)   ### Axiom
% 2.68/2.87  4. ((in T_1 T_2) /\ (in T_1 (relation_rng T_0))) (-. (in T_1 T_2))   ### And 3
% 2.68/2.87  5. ((in T_1 (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0))) <=> ((in T_1 T_2) /\ (in T_1 (relation_rng T_0)))) (-. (in T_1 T_2)) (in T_1 (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0)))   ### Equiv 2 4
% 2.68/2.87  6. ((relation T_0) => ((in T_1 (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0))) <=> ((in T_1 T_2) /\ (in T_1 (relation_rng T_0))))) (in T_1 (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0))) (-. (in T_1 T_2)) (relation T_0)   ### Imply 1 5
% 2.68/2.87  7. (All C, ((relation C) => ((in T_1 (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 C))) <=> ((in T_1 T_2) /\ (in T_1 (relation_rng C)))))) (relation T_0) (-. (in T_1 T_2)) (in T_1 (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0)))   ### All 6
% 2.68/2.87  8. (All B, (All C, ((relation C) => ((in T_1 (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction B C))) <=> ((in T_1 B) /\ (in T_1 (relation_rng C))))))) (in T_1 (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0))) (-. (in T_1 T_2)) (relation T_0)   ### All 7
% 2.68/2.87  9. (All A, (All B, (All C, ((relation C) => ((in A (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction B C))) <=> ((in A B) /\ (in A (relation_rng C)))))))) (relation T_0) (-. (in T_1 T_2)) (in T_1 (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0)))   ### All 8
% 2.68/2.87  10. (-. ((in T_1 (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0))) => (in T_1 T_2))) (relation T_0) (All A, (All B, (All C, ((relation C) => ((in A (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction B C))) <=> ((in A B) /\ (in A (relation_rng C))))))))   ### NotImply 9
% 2.68/2.87  11. (-. (All C, ((in C (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0))) => (in C T_2)))) (All A, (All B, (All C, ((relation C) => ((in A (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction B C))) <=> ((in A B) /\ (in A (relation_rng C)))))))) (relation T_0)   ### NotAllEx 10
% 2.68/2.87  12. (-. (subset (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0)) T_2)) (relation T_0) (All A, (All B, (All C, ((relation C) => ((in A (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction B C))) <=> ((in A B) /\ (in A (relation_rng C))))))))   ### Definition-Pseudo(subset) 11
% 2.68/2.87  13. (-. ((relation T_0) => (subset (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 T_0)) T_2))) (All A, (All B, (All C, ((relation C) => ((in A (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction B C))) <=> ((in A B) /\ (in A (relation_rng C))))))))   ### NotImply 12
% 2.68/2.87  14. (-. (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction T_2 B)) T_2)))) (All A, (All B, (All C, ((relation C) => ((in A (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction B C))) <=> ((in A B) /\ (in A (relation_rng C))))))))   ### NotAllEx 13
% 2.68/2.87  15. (-. (All A, (All B, ((relation B) => (subset (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction A B)) A))))) (All A, (All B, (All C, ((relation C) => ((in A (relation_rng (relation_rng_restriction B C))) <=> ((in A B) /\ (in A (relation_rng C))))))))   ### NotAllEx 14
% 2.68/2.87  % SZS output end Proof
% 2.68/2.87  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------