TSTP Solution File: SEU198+1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SEU198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:27:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  10   ~;   6   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (  31   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f111,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f80,f95,f93,f62]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(X2,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0)))
      | in(X2,X1)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X1,X0,X2] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ( ( in(X2,X1)
          & in(X2,relation_rng(X0)) )
      <=> in(X2,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0))) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X0)
     => ( ( in(X2,X1)
          & in(X2,relation_rng(X0)) )
      <=> in(X2,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0))) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f22,axiom,
    ! [X2,X1,X0] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( ( in(X0,relation_rng(X2))
          & in(X0,X1) )
      <=> in(X0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_relat_1) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    in(sK3(sK8,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK8,sK9))),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK8,sK9))),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f79,f71]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X1,X0)
      | in(sK3(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X1,X0)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( ~ in(X2,X1)
          | in(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
         => in(X2,X0) )
    <=> subset(X1,X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X0)
         => in(X2,X1) )
    <=> subset(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(f79,plain,
    ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK8,sK9)),sK8),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ? [X1,X0] :
      ( relation(X0)
      & ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0)),X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( relation(X0)
       => subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0)),X1) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X0] :
        ( relation(X1)
       => subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),X0) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f23,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t116_relat_1) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ~ in(sK3(sK8,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK8,sK9))),sK8),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f79,f70]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(sK3(X0,X1),X0)
      | subset(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    relation(sK9),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem    : SEU198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 14:47:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.46  % (25268)lrs+10_1:1_drc=off:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.18/0.47  % (25261)dis+10_1:1_newcnf=on:sgt=8:sos=on:ss=axioms:to=lpo:urr=on:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.18/0.47  % (25261)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.47  % (25261)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.47  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47  % (25261)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47  % (25261)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.47  % (25261)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.47  % (25261)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  % (25261)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 0.18/0.47  % (25261)Time elapsed: 0.096 s
% 0.18/0.47  % (25261)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.18/0.47  % (25261)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47  % (25261)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47  % (25252)Success in time 0.132 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------