TSTP Solution File: SEU198+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:20:03 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.39s 0.62s
% Output   : Refutation 0.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   5 unt;   1 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(4,axiom,
    ( subset(X,Y)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAO1'(X,Y),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( subset(X,Y)
    | ~ in('SKOLEMAAAO1'(X,Y),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

cnf(25,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ in(Y,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(Z,X)))
    | in(Y,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t115_relat_1) ).

cnf(28,negated_conjecture,
    relation('SKOLEMAAAO10'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t116_relat_1) ).

cnf(29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAO9','SKOLEMAAAO10')),'SKOLEMAAAO9'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t116_relat_1) ).

cnf(63,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAO1'(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAO9','SKOLEMAAAO10')),'SKOLEMAAAO9'),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAO9','SKOLEMAAAO10'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[29,4]) ).

cnf(64,plain,
    ~ in('SKOLEMAAAO1'(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAO9','SKOLEMAAAO10')),'SKOLEMAAAO9'),'SKOLEMAAAO9'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,29]) ).

cnf(588,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[25,64,28]),63]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SEU198+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 21:25:03 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47  * 
% 0.21/0.47  * 
% 0.21/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  "."
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-19T21:25:03
% 0.21/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n014.cluster.edu at 2022-06-19T21:25:03
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  #||
% 0.39/0.62  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.62  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.62  ||#
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.39/0.62  ;      1511 formulas have been input or derived (from 165 formulas).
% 0.39/0.62  ;       588 (39%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.39/0.62  ;           99 (17%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.39/0.62  ;          489 (83%) are still being kept.
% 0.39/0.62  ; 
% 0.39/0.62  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.003   2%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.001   1%   Assert                       (31 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.051  37%   Process new row              (1,259 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.035  25%   Resolution                   (328 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.002   1%   Paramodulation               (164 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (5 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.002   1%   Condensing                   (83 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.000   0%   Forward subsumption          (83 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.001   1%   Backward subsumption         (76 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.001   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (92 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.009   6%   Forward simplification       (1,135 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.008   6%   Backward simplification      (588 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.002   1%   Ordering                     (136 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.024  17%   Other
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.139        Total
% 0.39/0.62  ;     0.143        Real time
% 0.39/0.62  ; 
% 0.39/0.62  ; Term-hash-array has 1,059 terms in all.
% 0.39/0.62  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 73 entries (73 at peak, 76 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.39/0.62  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 428 nodes (428 at peak, 458 added, 30 deleted).
% 0.39/0.62  ;  Retrieved 99 possibly forward subsuming rows in 83 calls.
% 0.39/0.62  ;  Retrieved 2 possibly backward subsumed rows in 76 calls.
% 0.39/0.62  ; Path-index has 880 entries (880 at peak, 1,066 added, 186 deleted).
% 0.39/0.62  ; Path-index has 1,144 nodes (1,144 at peak, 1,224 added, 80 deleted).
% 0.39/0.62  ; Trie-index has 880 entries (880 at peak, 1,066 added, 186 deleted).
% 0.39/0.62  ; Trie-index has 2,253 nodes (2,253 at peak, 2,608 added, 355 deleted).
% 0.39/0.62  ; Retrieved 981 generalization terms in 2,419 calls.
% 0.39/0.62  ; Retrieved 537 instance terms in 511 calls.
% 0.39/0.62  ; Retrieved 16,513 unifiable terms in 3,024 calls.
% 0.39/0.62  ; 
% 0.39/0.62  ; The agenda of rows to process has 6 entries:
% 0.39/0.62  ;     2 with value 17              2 with value 19               2 with value 23
% 0.39/0.62  ; The agenda of rows to give has 341 entries:
% 0.39/0.62  ;    32 with value (4 13)         29 with value (4 20)           2 with value (4 32)
% 0.39/0.62  ;    37 with value (4 14)         16 with value (4 21)           2 with value (4 34)
% 0.39/0.62  ;    37 with value (4 15)         26 with value (4 22)           2 with value (4 35)
% 0.39/0.62  ;    37 with value (4 16)          4 with value (4 24)           2 with value (4 39)
% 0.39/0.62  ;    32 with value (4 17)          5 with value (4 25)           2 with value (4 41)
% 0.39/0.62  ;    30 with value (4 18)          2 with value (4 27)           2 with value (4 45)
% 0.39/0.62  ;    38 with value (4 19)          4 with value (4 30)
% 0.39/0.62  Evaluation took:
% 0.39/0.62    0.144 seconds of real time
% 0.39/0.62    0.121559 seconds of user run time
% 0.39/0.62    0.021002 seconds of system run time
% 0.39/0.62    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.39/0.62    0 page faults and
% 0.39/0.62    8,179,424 bytes consed.
% 0.39/0.62  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.39/0.62  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-19T21:25:03
% 0.39/0.62  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.39/0.62  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------