TSTP Solution File: SEU197+2 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SEU197+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 19:30:51 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 12.59s 1.99s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  157 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  197 (  79   ~;  88   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (   6 sgn;  38   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d5_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
        <=> ! [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X2)
            <=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.x3Xt4sOBrg/E---3.1_21697.p',d5_relat_1) ).

fof(t115_relat_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( in(X1,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)))
      <=> ( in(X1,X2)
          & in(X1,relation_rng(X3)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.x3Xt4sOBrg/E---3.1_21697.p',t115_relat_1) ).

fof(d12_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ! [X3] :
          ( relation(X3)
         => ( X3 = relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)
          <=> ! [X4,X5] :
                ( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
              <=> ( in(X5,X1)
                  & in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.x3Xt4sOBrg/E---3.1_21697.p',d12_relat_1) ).

fof(dt_k8_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.x3Xt4sOBrg/E---3.1_21697.p',dt_k8_relat_1) ).

fof(t20_relat_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation(X3)
     => ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
       => ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
          & in(X2,relation_rng(X3)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.x3Xt4sOBrg/E---3.1_21697.p',t20_relat_1) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X97,X98,X99,X101,X102,X103,X105] :
      ( ( ~ in(X99,X98)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk21_3(X97,X98,X99),X99),X97)
        | X98 != relation_rng(X97)
        | ~ relation(X97) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X102,X101),X97)
        | in(X101,X98)
        | X98 != relation_rng(X97)
        | ~ relation(X97) )
      & ( ~ in(esk22_2(X97,X103),X103)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X105,esk22_2(X97,X103)),X97)
        | X103 = relation_rng(X97)
        | ~ relation(X97) )
      & ( in(esk22_2(X97,X103),X103)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk23_2(X97,X103),esk22_2(X97,X103)),X97)
        | X103 = relation_rng(X97)
        | ~ relation(X97) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_relat_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( relation(X3)
       => ( in(X1,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)))
        <=> ( in(X1,X2)
            & in(X1,relation_rng(X3)) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t115_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk21_3(X3,X2,X1),X1),X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(esk3_0)
    & ( ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
      | ~ in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
      | ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0)) )
    & ( in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
      | in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))) )
    & ( in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0))
      | in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X164,X165,X166,X167,X168,X169,X170] :
      ( ( in(X168,X164)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X167,X168),X166)
        | X166 != relation_rng_restriction(X164,X165)
        | ~ relation(X166)
        | ~ relation(X165) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(X167,X168),X165)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X167,X168),X166)
        | X166 != relation_rng_restriction(X164,X165)
        | ~ relation(X166)
        | ~ relation(X165) )
      & ( ~ in(X170,X164)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X169,X170),X165)
        | in(ordered_pair(X169,X170),X166)
        | X166 != relation_rng_restriction(X164,X165)
        | ~ relation(X166)
        | ~ relation(X165) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk28_3(X164,X165,X166),esk29_3(X164,X165,X166)),X166)
        | ~ in(esk29_3(X164,X165,X166),X164)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk28_3(X164,X165,X166),esk29_3(X164,X165,X166)),X165)
        | X166 = relation_rng_restriction(X164,X165)
        | ~ relation(X166)
        | ~ relation(X165) )
      & ( in(esk29_3(X164,X165,X166),X164)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk28_3(X164,X165,X166),esk29_3(X164,X165,X166)),X166)
        | X166 = relation_rng_restriction(X164,X165)
        | ~ relation(X166)
        | ~ relation(X165) )
      & ( in(ordered_pair(esk28_3(X164,X165,X166),esk29_3(X164,X165,X166)),X165)
        | in(ordered_pair(esk28_3(X164,X165,X166),esk29_3(X164,X165,X166)),X166)
        | X166 = relation_rng_restriction(X164,X165)
        | ~ relation(X166)
        | ~ relation(X165) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d12_relat_1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X173,X174] :
      ( ~ relation(X174)
      | relation(relation_rng_restriction(X173,X174)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k8_relat_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk21_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2),X2),X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0))
    | in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4)
    | X4 != relation_rng_restriction(X5,X3)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X2,X1))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk21_3(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk1_0),esk1_0),relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0))
    | ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_17,lemma,
    ! [X122,X123,X124] :
      ( ( in(X122,relation_dom(X124))
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X122,X123),X124)
        | ~ relation(X124) )
      & ( in(X123,relation_rng(X124))
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X122,X123),X124)
        | ~ relation(X124) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_relat_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_rng_restriction(X4,X3)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk21_3(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk1_0),esk1_0),relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,lemma,
    ( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X1),X2)
    | ~ relation(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk21_3(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk1_0),esk1_0),esk3_0)
    | in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X1),X4)
    | X4 != relation_rng_restriction(X2,X5)
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ relation(X5) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk21_3(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk1_0),esk1_0),relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X3,X1),X5)
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X1),X4)
    | X5 != relation_rng_restriction(X2,X4)
    | ~ relation(X5)
    | ~ relation(X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,lemma,
    in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X1),relation_rng_restriction(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk21_3(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0),relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk1_0),esk1_0),relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))
    | in(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_14]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_rng_restriction(X3,X4))
    | ~ relation(X4)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4)
    | ~ in(X2,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,lemma,
    in(ordered_pair(esk21_3(esk3_0,relation_rng(esk3_0),esk1_0),esk1_0),esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_26]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
    | ~ in(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk21_3(esk3_0,relation_rng(esk3_0),esk1_0),esk1_0),relation_rng_restriction(X1,esk3_0))
    | ~ in(esk1_0,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
    | ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(esk3_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    in(ordered_pair(esk21_3(esk3_0,relation_rng(esk3_0),esk1_0),esk1_0),relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(esk1_0,relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,lemma,
    ~ relation(relation_rng_restriction(esk2_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,lemma,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_14]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : SEU197+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 09:05:43 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.x3Xt4sOBrg/E---3.1_21697.p
% 12.59/1.99  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 12.59/1.99  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 12.59/1.99  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # sh5l with pid 21777 completed with status 0
% 12.59/1.99  # Result found by sh5l
% 12.59/1.99  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 12.59/1.99  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 12.59/1.99  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-SFFFFFNN
% 12.59/1.99  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 127s (1) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 21781 completed with status 0
% 12.59/1.99  # Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 12.59/1.99  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 12.59/1.99  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 12.59/1.99  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-SFFFFFNN
% 12.59/1.99  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 12.59/1.99  # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 127s (1) cores
% 12.59/1.99  # Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 12.59/1.99  
% 12.59/1.99  # Proof found!
% 12.59/1.99  # SZS status Theorem
% 12.59/1.99  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.59/1.99  # Parsed axioms                        : 190
% 12.59/1.99  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 28
% 12.59/1.99  # Initial clauses                      : 292
% 12.59/1.99  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 12.59/1.99  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 290
% 12.59/1.99  # Processed clauses                    : 7940
% 12.59/1.99  # ...of these trivial                  : 147
% 12.59/1.99  # ...subsumed                          : 3637
% 12.59/1.99  # ...remaining for further processing  : 4156
% 12.59/1.99  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 70
% 12.59/1.99  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 12.59/1.99  # Backward-subsumed                    : 831
% 12.59/1.99  # Backward-rewritten                   : 322
% 12.59/1.99  # Generated clauses                    : 90017
% 12.59/1.99  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 86025
% 12.59/1.99  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 12.59/1.99  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 57
% 12.59/1.99  # Paramodulations                      : 89920
% 12.59/1.99  # Factorizations                       : 18
% 12.59/1.99  # NegExts                              : 0
% 12.59/1.99  # Equation resolutions                 : 75
% 12.59/1.99  # Total rewrite steps                  : 17012
% 12.59/1.99  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 12.59/1.99  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 12.59/1.99  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 12.59/1.99  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 12.59/1.99  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 12.59/1.99  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 12.59/1.99  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 12.59/1.99  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 12.59/1.99  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 12.59/1.99  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 12.59/1.99  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 12.59/1.99  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 12.59/1.99  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2947
% 12.59/1.99  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 363
% 12.59/1.99  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 12.59/1.99  #    Negative unit clauses             : 228
% 12.59/1.99  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2348
% 12.59/1.99  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 78252
% 12.59/1.99  # ...number of literals in the above   : 201350
% 12.59/1.99  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 12.59/1.99  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1162
% 12.59/1.99  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2187878
% 12.59/1.99  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1297252
% 12.59/1.99  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2750
% 12.59/1.99  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 150572
% 12.59/1.99  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 12.59/1.99  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 395
% 12.59/1.99  # BW rewrite match successes           : 110
% 12.59/1.99  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 12.59/1.99  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 12.59/1.99  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1288318
% 12.59/1.99  
% 12.59/1.99  # -------------------------------------------------
% 12.59/1.99  # User time                : 1.487 s
% 12.59/1.99  # System time              : 0.047 s
% 12.59/1.99  # Total time               : 1.534 s
% 12.59/1.99  # Maximum resident set size: 2808 pages
% 12.59/1.99  
% 12.59/1.99  # -------------------------------------------------
% 12.59/1.99  # User time                : 1.490 s
% 12.59/1.99  # System time              : 0.050 s
% 12.59/1.99  # Total time               : 1.540 s
% 12.59/1.99  # Maximum resident set size: 1864 pages
% 12.59/1.99  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------