%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU196+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.37s 1.54s
% Output   : Refutation 1.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU196+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 09:12:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.37/1.54  
% 1.37/1.54  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.37/1.54  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.37/1.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.37/1.54  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.37/1.54  SPASS derived 118 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 365 clauses.
% 1.37/1.54  SPASS allocated 104983 KBytes.
% 1.37/1.54  SPASS spent	0:00:01.20 on the problem.
% 1.37/1.54  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.37/1.54  		0:00:01.09 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.37/1.54  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 1.37/1.54  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 1.37/1.54  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 1.37/1.54  
% 1.37/1.54  
% 1.37/1.54  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 :
% 1.37/1.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.37/1.54  1[0:Inp] ||  -> relation(skc6)*.
% 1.37/1.54  64[0:Inp] relation(u) ||  -> relation(relation_dom_restriction(u,v))*.
% 1.37/1.54  72[0:Inp] || subset(relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(skc6,skc7)),relation_rng(skc6))*l -> .
% 1.37/1.54  92[0:Inp] relation(u) ||  -> subset(relation_dom_restriction(u,v),u)*l.
% 1.37/1.54  232[0:Inp] relation(u) relation(v) || subset(v,u) -> subset(relation_rng(v),relation_rng(u))*.
% 1.37/1.54  384[0:Res:1.0,92.0] ||  -> subset(relation_dom_restriction(skc6,u),skc6)*l.
% 1.37/1.54  406[0:Res:1.0,64.0] ||  -> relation(relation_dom_restriction(skc6,u))*.
% 1.37/1.54  457[0:Res:232.3,72.0] relation(relation_dom_restriction(skc6,skc7)) relation(skc6) || subset(relation_dom_restriction(skc6,skc7),skc6)*l -> .
% 1.37/1.54  460[0:MRR:457.0,457.1,457.2,406.0,1.0,384.0] ||  -> .
% 1.37/1.54  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.37/1.54  Formulae used in the proof : t99_relat_1 dt_k7_relat_1 t88_relat_1 t25_relat_1
% 1.37/1.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------