TSTP Solution File: SEU192+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU192+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:19:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.12s 2.39s
% Output   : Refutation 2.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   27 (  10 unt;   8 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   66 (  10 equ;  35 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | Y != relation_dom_restriction(X,Z)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(U,V),Y)
    | in(U,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d11_relat_1) ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | Y != relation_dom_restriction(X,Z)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(U,V),Y)
    | in(ordered_pair(U,V),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d11_relat_1) ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | Y != relation_dom_restriction(X,Z)
    | in(ordered_pair(U,V),Y)
    | ~ in(U,Z)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(U,V),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d11_relat_1) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | Y = relation_dom_restriction(X,Z)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV1'(Y,Z,X),'SKOLEMAAAV2'(Y,Z,X)),Y)
    | ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV1'(Y,Z,X),Z)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV1'(Y,Z,X),'SKOLEMAAAV2'(Y,Z,X)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d11_relat_1) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | Y = relation_dom_restriction(X,Z)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV1'(Y,Z,X),'SKOLEMAAAV2'(Y,Z,X)),Y)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV1'(Y,Z,X),'SKOLEMAAAV2'(Y,Z,X)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d11_relat_1) ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | Y != relation_dom(X)
    | ~ in(Z,Y)
    | in(ordered_pair(Z,'SKOLEMAAAV3'(Z,X)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_1) ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | Y != relation_dom(X)
    | in(Z,Y)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(Z,U),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_1) ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | relation(relation_dom_restriction(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k7_relat_1) ).

cnf(34,negated_conjecture,
    relation('SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t86_relat_1) ).

cnf(35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12')))
    | ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV12')
    | ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV13')) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t86_relat_1) ).

cnf(36,negated_conjecture,
    ( in('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12')))
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV12') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t86_relat_1) ).

cnf(37,negated_conjecture,
    ( in('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12')))
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV13')) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t86_relat_1) ).

cnf(45,plain,
    relation(relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13',X)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[14,34]) ).

cnf(71,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV13' = relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13',X)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV13',X,'SKOLEMAAAV13'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'('SKOLEMAAAV13',X,'SKOLEMAAAV13')),'SKOLEMAAAV13') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[8,34,34]) ).

cnf(90,plain,
    ( in('SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV12')
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV3'('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12'))),relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12')) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,45,36,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(91,plain,
    ( in('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV13'))
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV3'('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12'))),relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12')) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,45,37,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1503,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV12'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,90,34,45,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1504,plain,
    ( ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12')))
    | ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV13')) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[35,1503]) ).

cnf(2420,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV13' = relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13',X)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV13',X,'SKOLEMAAAV13'),relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV13')) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,71,34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2422,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV13' = relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13',relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV13')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,2420,34,34,71,71]) ).

cnf(3224,plain,
    ( in('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV13'))
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV3'('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12'))),'SKOLEMAAAV13') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4,91,34,45,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3228,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV13')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,3224,34,34,2422]) ).

cnf(3229,plain,
    ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV11',relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12'))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1504,3228]) ).

cnf(3231,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV11',X),relation_dom_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV13','SKOLEMAAAV12')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,3229,45,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3247,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV3'('SKOLEMAAAV11','SKOLEMAAAV13')),'SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,3228,34,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3251,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV11',X),'SKOLEMAAAV13'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,3231,34,45,1503,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3252,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[3247,3251]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : SEU192+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 22:17:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.49  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.49   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.49   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.49   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.49   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.49   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  "."
% 0.20/0.49  * 
% 0.20/0.49  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-19T22:17:08
% 0.20/0.49  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n012.cluster.edu at 2022-06-19T22:17:08
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|unordered_pair| ?X ?Y) (|unordered_pair| ?Y ?X)).
% 2.12/2.39  ; Declaring unordered_pair to be commutative.
% 2.12/2.39  
% 2.12/2.39  #||
% 2.12/2.39  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.12/2.39  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.12/2.39  ||#
% 2.12/2.39  
% 2.12/2.39  ; Summary of computation:
% 2.12/2.39  ;      5178 formulas have been input or derived (from 468 formulas).
% 2.12/2.39  ;      3252 (63%) were retained.  Of these,
% 2.12/2.39  ;          172 ( 5%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.12/2.39  ;         3080 (95%) are still being kept.
% 2.12/2.39  ; 
% 2.12/2.39  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.005   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.002   0%   Assert                       (31 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.291  15%   Process new row              (4,937 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     1.331  70%   Resolution                   (934 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.020   1%   Paramodulation               (467 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (34 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.009   0%   Condensing                   (444 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.038   2%   Forward subsumption          (444 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.018   1%   Backward subsumption         (372 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.004   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (591 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.082   4%   Forward simplification       (4,922 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.049   3%   Backward simplification      (3,252 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.006   0%   Ordering                     (5,975 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     0.048   3%   Other
% 2.12/2.39  ;     1.903        Total
% 2.12/2.39  ;     1.906        Real time
% 2.12/2.39  ; 
% 2.12/2.39  ; Term-hash-array has 7,658 terms in all.
% 2.12/2.39  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 328 entries (343 at peak, 372 added, 44 deleted).
% 2.12/2.39  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,922 nodes (3,120 at peak, 3,436 added, 514 deleted).
% 2.12/2.39  ;  Retrieved 536 possibly forward subsuming rows in 444 calls.
% 2.12/2.39  ;  Retrieved 67 possibly backward subsumed rows in 372 calls.
% 2.12/2.39  ; Path-index has 7,447 entries (7,450 at peak, 7,754 added, 307 deleted).
% 2.12/2.39  ; Path-index has 4,121 nodes (4,132 at peak, 4,319 added, 198 deleted).
% 2.12/2.39  ; Trie-index has 7,447 entries (7,450 at peak, 7,754 added, 307 deleted).
% 2.12/2.39  ; Trie-index has 29,140 nodes (29,149 at peak, 30,706 added, 1,566 deleted).
% 2.12/2.39  ; Retrieved 2,212 generalization terms in 22,168 calls.
% 2.12/2.39  ; Retrieved 2,881 instance terms in 2,879 calls.
% 2.12/2.39  ; Retrieved 1,605,473 unifiable terms in 132,215 calls.
% 2.12/2.39  ; 
% 2.12/2.39  ; The agenda of rows to process has 13 entries:
% 2.12/2.39  ;     1 with value 12              2 with value 17               2 with value 23
% 2.12/2.39  ;     2 with value 13              2 with value 19               2 with value 27
% 2.12/2.39  ;     2 with value 15
% 2.12/2.39  ; The agenda of rows to give has 2655 entries:
% 2.12/2.39  ;     4 with value (4 11)          4 with value (4 42)           4 with value (4 83)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     2 with value (4 13)          8 with value (4 43)           4 with value (4 84)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     1 with value (4 15)          4 with value (4 44)           4 with value (4 85)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     2 with value (4 16)          2 with value (4 48)           4 with value (4 86)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     1 with value (4 18)          6 with value (4 51)           4 with value (4 87)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     2 with value (4 19)         10 with value (4 52)           4 with value (4 88)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     1 with value (4 20)          6 with value (4 54)           4 with value (4 92)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     2 with value (4 22)          2 with value (4 55)           4 with value (4 93)
% 2.12/2.39  ;   120 with value (4 23)          4 with value (4 56)           4 with value (4 95)
% 2.12/2.39  ;   115 with value (4 24)          4 with value (4 57)           8 with value (4 96)
% 2.12/2.39  ;   137 with value (4 25)          2 with value (4 61)           4 with value (4 98)
% 2.12/2.39  ;   210 with value (4 26)          2 with value (4 63)           4 with value (4 99)
% 2.12/2.39  ;   224 with value (4 27)         10 with value (4 64)           4 with value (4 100)
% 2.12/2.39  ;   320 with value (4 28)          4 with value (4 65)           4 with value (4 101)
% 2.12/2.39  ;   196 with value (4 29)          6 with value (4 66)           4 with value (4 107)
% 2.12/2.39  ;   318 with value (4 30)          4 with value (4 67)           8 with value (4 108)
% 2.12/2.39  ;   176 with value (4 31)          6 with value (4 68)           4 with value (4 109)
% 2.12/2.39  ;   260 with value (4 32)          4 with value (4 69)           4 with value (4 111)
% 2.12/2.39  ;   132 with value (4 33)          4 with value (4 71)           4 with value (4 112)
% 2.12/2.39  ;   164 with value (4 34)          6 with value (4 74)           4 with value (4 118)
% 2.12/2.39  ;    19 with value (4 35)          4 with value (4 76)           4 with value (4 120)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     3 with value (4 36)          2 with value (4 77)           4 with value (4 123)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     2 with value (4 37)          4 with value (4 78)           4 with value (4 124)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     2 with value (4 38)          8 with value (4 79)           4 with value (4 135)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     2 with value (4 40)          4 with value (4 80)           4 with value (4 136)
% 2.12/2.39  ;     2 with value (4 41)          6 with value (4 82)           4 with value (4 148)
% 2.12/2.39  Evaluation took:
% 2.12/2.39    1.907 seconds of real time
% 2.12/2.39    1.818585 seconds of user run time
% 2.12/2.39    0.087742 seconds of system run time
% 2.12/2.39    [Run times include 0.156 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.12/2.39    0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.12/2.39    0 page faults and
% 2.12/2.39    129,707,968 bytes consed.
% 2.12/2.39  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.12/2.39  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-19T22:17:09
% 2.12/2.39  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.12/2.39  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------