TSTP Solution File: SEU191+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU191+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.07s 117.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 48 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 209 ( 41 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 38 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 270 ( 109 ~; 124 |; 22 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 9 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 4 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 96 ( 10 sgn 47 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t74_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X3),X4))
<=> ( in(X1,X3)
& in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t74_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& relation(X2) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k6_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] : relation(identity_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k6_relat_1) ).
fof(d8_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( X3 = relation_composition(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4,X5] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
<=> ? [X6] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X6),X1)
& in(ordered_pair(X6,X5),X2) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d8_relat_1) ).
fof(d10_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( X2 = identity_relation(X1)
<=> ! [X3,X4] :
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2)
<=> ( in(X3,X1)
& X3 = X4 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d10_relat_1) ).
fof(t20_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
& in(X2,relation_rng(X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t20_relat_1) ).
fof(t71_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1] :
( relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)) = X1
& relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t71_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X3),X4))
<=> ( in(X1,X3)
& in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t74_relat_1]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| relation(relation_composition(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk4_0)
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) )
& ( in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X2] : relation(identity_relation(X2)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_relat_1]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X10,X11,X13,X16] :
( ( in(ordered_pair(X10,esk17_5(X7,X8,X9,X10,X11)),X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X10,X11),X9)
| X9 != relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk17_5(X7,X8,X9,X10,X11),X11),X8)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X10,X11),X9)
| X9 != relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X10,X13),X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X13,X11),X8)
| in(ordered_pair(X10,X11),X9)
| X9 != relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk18_3(X7,X8,X9),esk19_3(X7,X8,X9)),X9)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk18_3(X7,X8,X9),X16),X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X16,esk19_3(X7,X8,X9)),X8)
| X9 = relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk18_3(X7,X8,X9),esk20_3(X7,X8,X9)),X7)
| in(ordered_pair(esk18_3(X7,X8,X9),esk19_3(X7,X8,X9)),X9)
| X9 = relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk20_3(X7,X8,X9),esk19_3(X7,X8,X9)),X8)
| in(ordered_pair(esk18_3(X7,X8,X9),esk19_3(X7,X8,X9)),X9)
| X9 = relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( relation(relation_composition(X1,esk4_0))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
relation(identity_relation(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X4,esk17_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),esk4_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X7,X8] :
( ( in(X7,X5)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| X6 != identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( X7 = X8
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| X6 != identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(X7,X5)
| X7 != X8
| in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| X6 != identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk21_2(X5,X6),esk22_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| ~ in(esk21_2(X5,X6),X5)
| esk21_2(X5,X6) != esk22_2(X5,X6)
| X6 = identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(esk21_2(X5,X6),X5)
| in(ordered_pair(esk21_2(X5,X6),esk22_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| X6 = identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( esk21_2(X5,X6) = esk22_2(X5,X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk21_2(X5,X6),esk22_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| X6 = identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk17_5(X1,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0)),X1)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0) != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| in(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(esk17_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5),X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( X3 = X4
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != identity_relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk17_5(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0)),identity_relation(esk3_0))
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]),c_0_11]),c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_25,lemma,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(X5,relation_rng(X6))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk17_5(X1,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0)),X1)
| in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0) != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_21]),c_0_18])]) ).
fof(c_0_27,lemma,
! [X2,X2] :
( relation_dom(identity_relation(X2)) = X2
& relation_rng(identity_relation(X2)) = X2 ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t71_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk17_5(X1,X2,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0),esk2_0),X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0) != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( esk17_5(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk1_0
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| identity_relation(esk3_0) != identity_relation(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != identity_relation(X2)
| X3 != X4
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,lemma,
( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk17_5(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0)),identity_relation(esk3_0))
| in(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]),c_0_11]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk17_5(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0),esk2_0),esk4_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]),c_0_11]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( esk17_5(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk1_0
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),X2)
| X2 != identity_relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,lemma,
in(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X6,X5),X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X6),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,lemma,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0),X1)
| X1 != identity_relation(esk3_0)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,esk2_0),X2)
| X2 != relation_composition(X3,esk4_0)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,esk1_0),X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,lemma,
in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0),identity_relation(esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_37])]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,lemma,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1)
| X1 != relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_39])]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,lemma,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_45]),c_0_18])]),c_0_46]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU191+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 11:14:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/23.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.47 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.56/46.47 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.73/69.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.73/69.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.73/69.48 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.73/69.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.90/92.47 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.90/92.47 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.90/92.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.90/92.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.06/115.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.06/115.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.06/115.52 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.06/115.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/117.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/117.26
% 1.07/117.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/117.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/117.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.031 s
% 1.07/117.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/117.26
% 1.07/117.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/117.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/117.26 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 1.07/117.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.030 s
% 1.07/117.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_75515770aeb32f68e33e9fbd9dff93f5a2e34f2e for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/117.26
% 1.07/117.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/117.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/117.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 1.07/117.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6c565d2524e660970ec2a72c26d577f665a55420 for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/117.26
% 1.07/117.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/117.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/117.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 1.07/117.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_750456fc664a9e0b97096ad0f5110b1ead7d782b for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/117.26
% 1.07/117.26 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.07/117.26 # OLD status Res
% 1.07/117.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 1.07/117.26 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a9abcacdf80c460fdc9fe242616d68da2308faf5 for 23 seconds:
% 1.07/117.26 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 1.07/117.26 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 1.07/117.26
% 1.07/117.26 # Proof found!
% 1.07/117.26 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.07/117.26 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.07/117.26 # Proof object total steps : 48
% 1.07/117.26 # Proof object clause steps : 33
% 1.07/117.26 # Proof object formula steps : 15
% 1.07/117.26 # Proof object conjectures : 21
% 1.07/117.26 # Proof object clause conjectures : 18
% 1.07/117.26 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.07/117.26 # Proof object initial clauses used : 13
% 1.07/117.26 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 1.07/117.26 # Proof object generating inferences : 17
% 1.07/117.26 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 34
% 1.07/117.26 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.07/117.26 # Parsed axioms : 177
% 1.07/117.26 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 125
% 1.07/117.26 # Initial clauses : 98
% 1.07/117.26 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.07/117.26 # Initial clauses in saturation : 98
% 1.07/117.26 # Processed clauses : 1839
% 1.07/117.26 # ...of these trivial : 9
% 1.07/117.26 # ...subsumed : 201
% 1.07/117.26 # ...remaining for further processing : 1629
% 1.07/117.26 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 29
% 1.07/117.26 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.07/117.26 # Backward-subsumed : 68
% 1.07/117.26 # Backward-rewritten : 379
% 1.07/117.26 # Generated clauses : 151593
% 1.07/117.26 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 151525
% 1.07/117.26 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.07/117.26 # Paramodulations : 151357
% 1.07/117.26 # Factorizations : 8
% 1.07/117.26 # Equation resolutions : 227
% 1.07/117.26 # Current number of processed clauses : 1178
% 1.07/117.26 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 400
% 1.07/117.26 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.07/117.26 # Negative unit clauses : 58
% 1.07/117.26 # Non-unit-clauses : 720
% 1.07/117.26 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 136197
% 1.07/117.26 # ...number of literals in the above : 167103
% 1.07/117.26 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.07/117.26 # Current number of archived clauses : 448
% 1.07/117.26 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 87969
% 1.07/117.26 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 74743
% 1.07/117.26 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 228
% 1.07/117.26 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 32515
% 1.07/117.26 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.07/117.26 # BW rewrite match attempts : 19173
% 1.07/117.26 # BW rewrite match successes : 21
% 1.07/117.26 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.07/117.26 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.07/117.26 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10328054
% 1.07/117.26
% 1.07/117.26 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.07/117.26 # User time : 1.428 s
% 1.07/117.26 # System time : 0.072 s
% 1.07/117.26 # Total time : 1.500 s
% 1.07/117.26 # Maximum resident set size: 130860 pages
% 1.07/138.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/138.53 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/138.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.07/138.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.07/138.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.07/138.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/138.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.54 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.07/138.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.07/138.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/138.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/138.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.07/138.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.55 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/138.55 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.07/138.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/138.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/138.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/138.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.56 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/138.56 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/138.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/138.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.57 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/138.57 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.07/138.58 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.07/138.58 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------