TSTP Solution File: SEU191+1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SEU191+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:25:50 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.85s 0.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 39 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 179 ( 29 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 38 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 239 ( 99 ~; 109 |; 18 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 4 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 93 ( 5 sgn 38 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d8_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( X3 = relation_composition(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4,X5] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
<=> ? [X6] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X6),X1)
& in(ordered_pair(X6,X5),X2) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& relation(X2) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(t74_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X3),X4))
<=> ( in(X1,X3)
& in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t74_relat_1) ).
fof(d10_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( X2 = identity_relation(X1)
<=> ! [X3,X4] :
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2)
<=> ( in(X3,X1)
& X3 = X4 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k6_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] : relation(identity_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X13,X14,X15,X16,X17,X19,X20,X21,X24] :
( ( in(ordered_pair(X16,esk5_5(X13,X14,X15,X16,X17)),X13)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X16,X17),X15)
| X15 != relation_composition(X13,X14)
| ~ relation(X15)
| ~ relation(X14)
| ~ relation(X13) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk5_5(X13,X14,X15,X16,X17),X17),X14)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X16,X17),X15)
| X15 != relation_composition(X13,X14)
| ~ relation(X15)
| ~ relation(X14)
| ~ relation(X13) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X19,X21),X13)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X21,X20),X14)
| in(ordered_pair(X19,X20),X15)
| X15 != relation_composition(X13,X14)
| ~ relation(X15)
| ~ relation(X14)
| ~ relation(X13) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X13,X14,X15),esk7_3(X13,X14,X15)),X15)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X13,X14,X15),X24),X13)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X24,esk7_3(X13,X14,X15)),X14)
| X15 = relation_composition(X13,X14)
| ~ relation(X15)
| ~ relation(X14)
| ~ relation(X13) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X13,X14,X15),esk8_3(X13,X14,X15)),X13)
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X13,X14,X15),esk7_3(X13,X14,X15)),X15)
| X15 = relation_composition(X13,X14)
| ~ relation(X15)
| ~ relation(X14)
| ~ relation(X13) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk8_3(X13,X14,X15),esk7_3(X13,X14,X15)),X14)
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X13,X14,X15),esk7_3(X13,X14,X15)),X15)
| X15 = relation_composition(X13,X14)
| ~ relation(X15)
| ~ relation(X14)
| ~ relation(X13) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X30,X31] :
( ~ relation(X30)
| ~ relation(X31)
| relation(relation_composition(X30,X31)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X3),X4))
<=> ( in(X1,X3)
& in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t74_relat_1]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X36,X37,X38,X39,X40,X41] :
( ( in(X38,X36)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X38,X39),X37)
| X37 != identity_relation(X36)
| ~ relation(X37) )
& ( X38 = X39
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X38,X39),X37)
| X37 != identity_relation(X36)
| ~ relation(X37) )
& ( ~ in(X40,X36)
| X40 != X41
| in(ordered_pair(X40,X41),X37)
| X37 != identity_relation(X36)
| ~ relation(X37) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk9_2(X36,X37),esk10_2(X36,X37)),X37)
| ~ in(esk9_2(X36,X37),X36)
| esk9_2(X36,X37) != esk10_2(X36,X37)
| X37 = identity_relation(X36)
| ~ relation(X37) )
& ( in(esk9_2(X36,X37),X36)
| in(ordered_pair(esk9_2(X36,X37),esk10_2(X36,X37)),X37)
| X37 = identity_relation(X36)
| ~ relation(X37) )
& ( esk9_2(X36,X37) = esk10_2(X36,X37)
| in(ordered_pair(esk9_2(X36,X37),esk10_2(X36,X37)),X37)
| X37 = identity_relation(X36)
| ~ relation(X37) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X44] : relation(identity_relation(X44)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,esk5_5(X2,X3,X4,X1,X5)),X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X5),X4)
| X4 != relation_composition(X2,X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk4_0)
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) )
& ( in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(esk5_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5),X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
| X3 != identity_relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
relation(identity_relation(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,esk5_5(X2,X3,relation_composition(X2,X3),X1,X4)),X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X4),relation_composition(X2,X3)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),X4)
| X4 != identity_relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(esk5_5(X1,X2,relation_composition(X1,X2),X3,X4),X4),X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),identity_relation(X3)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk5_5(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0)),identity_relation(esk3_0))
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),identity_relation(X2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X4),X6)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X4),X5)
| X6 != relation_composition(X3,X5)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk5_5(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0),esk2_0),esk4_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( esk5_5(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0,relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0),esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk1_0
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X3),X4)
| ~ in(X1,X2)
| X1 != X3
| X4 != identity_relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_23]),c_0_18]),c_0_15])]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X2),X4)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X5),X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),identity_relation(X2))
| ~ in(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,esk2_0),relation_composition(X2,esk4_0))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,esk1_0),X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0),identity_relation(esk3_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_32])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_15])]),c_0_37]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SEU191+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 17:24:53 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.85/0.58 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.85/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.85/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.85/0.58 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.85/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.58 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.58 # new_bool_1 with pid 24876 completed with status 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.85/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.85/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.85/0.58 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.85/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.58 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.85/0.58 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.85/0.58 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.85/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 163s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.58 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with pid 24879 completed with status 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA
% 0.85/0.58 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.85/0.58 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.85/0.58 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.85/0.58 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.58 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.58 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.85/0.58 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.85/0.58 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.85/0.58 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 163s (1) cores
% 0.85/0.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.85/0.58 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.85/0.58
% 0.85/0.58 # Proof found!
% 0.85/0.58 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.85/0.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.85/0.58 # Parsed axioms : 31
% 0.85/0.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 15
% 0.85/0.58 # Initial clauses : 33
% 0.85/0.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 33
% 0.85/0.58 # Processed clauses : 684
% 0.85/0.58 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.85/0.58 # ...subsumed : 474
% 0.85/0.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 209
% 0.85/0.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 11
% 0.85/0.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Backward-subsumed : 9
% 0.85/0.58 # Backward-rewritten : 28
% 0.85/0.58 # Generated clauses : 4225
% 0.85/0.58 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4125
% 0.85/0.58 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 18
% 0.85/0.58 # Paramodulations : 4215
% 0.85/0.58 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # NegExts : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Equation resolutions : 11
% 0.85/0.58 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Total rewrite steps : 987
% 0.85/0.58 # ...of those cached : 955
% 0.85/0.58 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.85/0.58 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.85/0.58 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.85/0.58 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.85/0.58 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.85/0.58 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.85/0.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 133
% 0.85/0.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.85/0.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Negative unit clauses : 26
% 0.85/0.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 87
% 0.85/0.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3275
% 0.85/0.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 18561
% 0.85/0.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 70
% 0.85/0.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3253
% 0.85/0.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1320
% 0.85/0.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 206
% 0.85/0.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 283
% 0.85/0.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 16
% 0.85/0.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.85/0.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.85/0.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 94578
% 0.85/0.58 # Search garbage collected termcells : 702
% 0.85/0.58
% 0.85/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.85/0.58 # User time : 0.098 s
% 0.85/0.58 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.85/0.58 # Total time : 0.101 s
% 0.85/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 1844 pages
% 0.85/0.58
% 0.85/0.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.85/0.58 # User time : 0.099 s
% 0.85/0.58 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.85/0.58 # Total time : 0.104 s
% 0.85/0.58 # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.85/0.58 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.85/0.58 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------